Dear John, The building safety crisis is one of the biggest scandals in the housing sector in decades. As I wrote in my newsletter last week, an estimated 11 million people around the country are living in unsafe homes, and progress to fix these issues has been glacially
slow. This week I put my name to two amendments to the Fire Safety Bill that would protect leaseholders from the incredible burden this crisis has placed on their shoulders. In response to growing pressure from campaigners and politicians, the Government announced on Wednesday an additional 3.5bn of funding to remediate buildings over 18 metres high, but that leaseholders in buildings below this or six stories, would have to take out loans costing £600 a year. While additional funding is welcome, this announcement comes too late for many of the first-time buyers who have already gone bust, and still excludes the majority of those affected from support. Progress has been too slow. Over 100
buildings in Birmingham have applied to the Building Safety Fund, yet not one has received a drop of money so far. Meanwhile, leaseholders in Edgbaston continue to pay for stopgap safety measures that have already cost them more than £200,000. I am also concerned that the 18 metre threshold for funding is arbitrary, when really we need remediation works prioritised by risk. In 2019 Richmond House in London burned down in just nine minutes. Not a single flat was saved. Yet, because this building was below 18 metres, under the Government's proposals it would not be eligible for funding to make it safe. Ministers have promised on 17 separate occasions that leaseholders wouldn’t have to pay
for a crisis they didn’t cause. A cladding tax on leaseholders breaks that promise. |