Joe Biden deserves a trophy for his audacity, but he’s not going to
escape serious scrutiny over his apparent threatening of the Ukraine
government for his son’s personal gain.

[INSIDE JW]

TOM FITTON: JW SUES FOR BIDEN-UKRAINE DOCS; PLOT TO 'WEAR A WIRE' IN
OVAL OFFICE; STEELE & STATE DEPT. RELATIONSHIP

[[link removed]]


JUDICIAL WATCH STEPS UP AND SUES FOR RECORDS ON FIRING OF
BIDEN-UKRAINE PROSECUTOR
Joe Biden deserves a trophy for his audacity, but he’s not going to
escape serious scrutiny over his apparent threatening of the Ukraine
government for his son’s personal gain.

We filed a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) lawsuit for records about
the firing of Ukraine’s top prosecutor after then-Vice President
Biden threated to withhold aid. We filed the lawsuit on Wednesday
against the U.S. Department of State (_Judicial Watch v. U.S.
Department of State
[[link removed]
(No.
1:19-cv-02893)).

We sued after, as per usual, the State Department failed to respond to
our May 7, 2019, FOIA request seeking access to the following records:


> 1. Any and all records regarding, concerning, or related to Viktor
> Shokin’s investigation of Mykola Zolchevsky and Shokin’s
> resignation at Ukraine’s Prosecutor General.

> 2. Any and all records of communication between any official,
> employee, or representative of the Department of State and any
> official, employee, or representative of the Office of the Vice
> President regarding Viktor Shokin.
In a widely distributed video
[[link removed]],
Joe Biden confirmed that he successfully pressured, under threat of
withholding $1 billion in U.S. government aid, the Ukrainian
government to fire Shokin, who had allegedly launched an investigation
into Burisma, which had purportedly paid Biden’s son Hunter $50,000
a month.

The latest impeachment/coup assault on President Trump is an obvious
attempt to protect Joe Biden from the corruption scandals involving
his son. Our lawsuit will be the first of many to try to get to the
bottom of this influence-peddling scandal.

NEW SMOKING GUN FBI MEMO DETAILS PLOT TO ‘WEAR A WIRE’ IN
PRESIDENT TRUMP’S OVAL OFFICE

It’s easy to become blasé about the never-ending flow of
astonishing revelations in Washington. A deputy attorney general
secretly recording the President of the United States in the Oval
Office, because he knows they won’t pat him down at the door?

Yes.

We just obtained a two-page memo
[[link removed]]
written by then-Acting FBI Director Andrew McCabe detailing how Deputy
Attorney General Rod Rosenstein proposed wearing a wire into the Oval
Office “to collect additional evidence on the president’s true
intentions.”

McCabe writes in the May 16, 2017, memo that Rosenstein said he
thought it was possible because “he was not searched when he entered
the White House.”

The Justice Department turned the document over in response to our
February 2019, Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) lawsuit
[[link removed]].
We sued after the Justice Department and FBI failed to respond to
September 2, 2018, FOIA requests for documents about any FBI/DOJ
discussions regarding the 25th Amendment and plans to secretly record
President Trump in the Oval Office (_Judicial Watch v. U.S. Department
of Justice_
[[link removed]]
(No. 1:19-cv-00388).

In short, we sued for the coup docs and hit pay dirt.

The memo, which is redacted in key sections, purports to serve as a
“contemporaneous recollection” of a meeting that day (“12:30 pm
on 5/16/2017”) in Rosenstein’s office. The meeting included
Rosenstein, Deputy Assistant AG for Intelligence Tashina Gauhar
[[link removed]]
and
Principal Associate Deputy Attorney General Jim Crowell
[[link removed]]
in
Rosenstein’s Justice Department office.

McCabe writes he began the meeting by telling Rosenstein that he
“approved the opening of an investigation of President Donald Trump
… to investigate allegations of possible collusion between the
president and the Russian Government, possible obstruction of justice
related to the firing of FBI Director James Comey, and possible
conspiracy to obstruct justice.” In justifying his investigation,
McCabe refers to the memos Comey secretly wrote on meetings he had
with President Trump and an NBC interview with Lester Holt. McCabe
writes he “informed DAG [Rosenstein] that as a result of his role in
the matter, I thought he would be a witness to the case.”

Rosenstein responded by recounting his discussion with President
Trump, then-Attorney General Sessions and then-White House Counsel Don
McGahn about Comey’s imminent firing and that President Trump wanted
him to write a “memo explaining the reason” for Comey’s firing.
McCabe writes:

> As our conversation continued the DAG proposed that he could
> potentially wear a recording device into the Oval Office to collect
> additional evidence on the President’s true intentions. He said he
> thought this might be possible because he was not searched when he
> entered the White House. I told him that I would discuss the
> opportunity with my investigative team and get back to him.

> We discussed the issue of appointing a Special Counsel to oversee
> the FBI’s Russia investigation. The DAG said he has two candidates
> ready, one of whom could start immediately.
Additionally, McCabe admits that Rosenstein told him that McCabe had
a “credibility problem” because a Rosenstein staffer had provided
him with photos of McCabe wearing his wife’s campaign t-shirt in
contradiction to McCabe’s “assurance” he had no role in her
campaign. McCabe writes he told him the photos were not from campaign
events and that he confirmed with “my ethics counsel at FBI” that
wearing such a shirt did not “constitute proscribed political
activity.”

Earlier this month, through this same lawsuit, we uncovered DOJ
records that also confirmed discussions
[[link removed]]
about
wearing a wire to record President Trump. Another Judicial Watch
lawsuit recently uncovered
[[link removed]]
documents that show the FBI had to retrieve memos about alleged
conversations from Trump, which included classified information, from
Comey’s home. And yet another Judicial Watch lawsuit uncovered
documents about Andrew McCabe’s conflicts of interest issues related
to his wife’s political campaign that took in hundreds of thousands
of dollars from then-Virginia Governor Terrence McAuliffe, who is
closely tied to the Clintons (see here
[[link removed]]
and here
[[link removed]]).

This incredible memo details the conflicted and conniving coup effort
against President Trump. It is astonishing and shocking that McCabe
thought he could have the FBI conduct a “counterintelligence”
operation on the president and Rosenstein thought it would be
appropriate to wear a wire to secretly record President Trump in the
Oval Office. That the DOJ and FBI sat on this smoking gun for a year
shows the need for urgent housecleaning at those agencies.

The full text of the redacted McCabe memo is printed below:

> Tuesday, May 16, 2017

> At 12:30 pm on 05/16/2017, I met with Deputy Attorney General (DAG)
> Rod Rosenstein in his office at the Department of Justice. Also
> present were Tashina Gauhar and Jim Crowell. The following is a
> contemporaneous recollection of the main topics we discussed.

> I began by telling him that today I approved the opening of an
> investigation of President Donald Trump. I explained that the
> purpose of the investigation was to investigate allegations of
> possible collusion between the president and the Russian Government,
> possible obstruction of justice related to the firing of FBI
> Director James Comey, and possible conspiracy to obstruct justice.
> The DAG questioned what I meant by collusion and I explained that I
> was referring to the investigation of any potential links between
> the Trump campaign and the Russian government. I explained that
> counterintelligence investigations of this sort were meant to
> uncover any existence of any threat to national security as well as
> whether or not criminal conduct had occurred. Regarding the
> obstruction issues, I made clear that our predication was based not
> only on the president's comments last week to reporter Lester Holt
> (that he connected the firing of the director to the FBI’s Russia
> investigation), but also on the several concurring comments the
> president made to Director Comey over the last few months. These
> comments included the President's requests for assurances of
> loyalty, statements about the Russia investigation and the
> investigation of General Michael Flynn. I also informed the DAG that
> Director Comey preserved his recollection of these interactions in a
> series of contemporaneously drafted memos. Finally, I informed the
> DAG that as a result of his role in the matter, I thought he would
> be a witness in the case.

> The DAG then related his experiences at the White House on Monday,
> 05/08/2017. He began by stating that he had the feeling that the
> decision to fire the Director had been made before he arrived. At
> the White House, he first met with White House Counsel Donald
> McGahn, who told him that the President had drafted a letter to
> Director Comey that McGahn did not want the President to send.
> Shortly thereafter they met with the President and Attorney General
> Jeff Sessions, and possibly others, in the Oval Office. President
> Trump told the DAG he had written a letter to Director Comey, asked
> the DAG if he had seen the letter, and instructed McGahn to provide
> the DAG with a copy. The DAG described the letter to me as being a
> long list, possibly several pages, of the President's complaints
> with Director Comey. Among those complaints was a discussion about
> the FBI’s Russia investigation, as well as a paragraph about the
> FBI Deputy Director. The DAG indicated to me that he retained a copy
> of the President's letter. The DAG said he told the President
> [redacted]. The President then directed the DAG to write a memo
> explaining the reasoning for Director Comey’s termination and that
> the DAG should include Russia. The DAG said to the President he did
> not think this was a good idea and that his memo did not need to
> include Russia. The President replied that he understood, but that
> he was asking the DAG to include Russia anyway. As our conversation
> continued the DAG proposed that he could potentially wear a
> recording device into the Oval Office to collect additional evidence
> on the President's true intentions. He said he thought this might be
> possible because he was not searched when he entered the White
> House. I told him that I would discuss the opportunity with my
> investigative team and get back to him.

> We discussed the issue of appointing a Special Counsel to oversee
> the FBI’s Russia investigation. The DAG said he has two candidates
> ready one of whom could start immediately. [Redacted] The DAG said
> that he left a copy of the delegation with Acting Assistant Attorney
> General for National Security Dana Boente to execute in the DAG’s
> absence if the DAG were suddenly removed from his position.
> [Redacted] He anticipated that he may be terminated when he puts the
> Special Counsel in place, in light of the president's anger with AG
> Sessions when the AG recused himself from the Russia investigation.
> The DAG further stated that he was told that others heard the
> President tell the AG “you were supposed to protect me.”

> [Redacted]

> The DAG related to me that on Sunday, 05/14/17, the AG asked him to
> participate in the interview of [redacted] for the position of FBI
> Director. [Redacted].

> The DAG told me that he informed the AG that I should remain in my
> role as Acting Director until the permanent Director was chosen. The
> DAG opined that my only "problem" was that some people believe that
> I was involved in my wife's 2015 campaign for State Senate in
> Virginia. The DAG said it was a “credibility problem” because
> after having told him during my May 13 interview that I played no
> role in her campaign and attended no campaign events, the DAG said a
> staffer had provided him with a photograph found on the internet of
> me and my wife wearing Dr. Jill McCabe campaign t-shirts. The DAG
> suggested that this photograph contradicted my statement that I had
> not campaigned for my wife. I pointed out to the DAG that the
> photograph he saw was taken not at a campaign event, but rather at
> [redacted] I further informed the DAG that I confirmed with my
> ethics counsel at FBI that the Hatch Act does not prohibit wearing a
> campaign button or shirt away from the office, and that attending
> [redacted] wearing such a shirt does not constitute proscribed
> political activity.

DOCUMENTS REVEAL EXTENSIVE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN DOSSIER AUTHOR STEELE
AND TOP OBAMA STATE DEPARTMENT OFFICIALS

It is now abundantly clear that Clinton spy Christopher Steele had an
outsized influence at the Obama State Department that proved useful
when the Clinton campaign needed help smearing Trump in 2016 and
beyond.

This becomes clear in 146 pages
[[link removed]]
of
State Department documents which reveal that former British spy and
Dossier author Steele’s close working relationship with high-ranking
Obama State Department officials dating back to May of 2014.

The documents we obtained in a FOIA lawsuit show that, from May 2014
to November 2015, Steele filed dozens of reports with his close
associate at State, Special Coordinator for Libya Jonathan Winer, who
would then pass them to Assistant Secretary of State Victoria Nuland.
The reports focused mainly on the Russia-Ukraine crisis and U.S.
sanctions on Russia.

The documents show that Steele’s work was also distributed to State
Department Coordinator for Sanctions Policy Daniel Fried and Principal
Deputy Assistant Secretary Paul Jones, whose focus in the Bureau of
European and Eurasian Affairs was on Russia and Ukraine policy.

The documents are Orbis Business Intelligence reports that Steele
provided to the State Department. Steele, a former MI6 spy,
co-founded Orbis
[[link removed]]
in 2009.

We filed our lawsuit
[[link removed]]
on April 25, 2018, on behalf of The Daily Caller News Foundation after
State failed to respond to three separate FOIA requests (_Judicial
Watch v. U.S. Department of State_
[[link removed]]
(No.
1:18-cv-00968)). The lawsuit seeks:


* All records of communications between State Department officials,
including former Secretary of State John Kerry, former Secretary of
State Hillary Clinton, and Assistant Secretary of State Victoria
Nuland, on the one hand, and British National Christopher Steele
and/or employees or contractors of Steele’s company, Orbis Business
Intelligence, on the other hand.
* All records and/or memoranda provided by Christopher Steele and/or
his firm Orbis Business Intelligence or by others acting on
Steele’s/Orbis’s behalf, to State Department officials.
* Any and all records in the custody of the State Department related
to the provision of documents to British national Christopher Steele
and/or his firm, Orbis Business Intelligence, or the receipt of
documents from Steele or his firm. Time period is January 20, 2009
through the present.
* All records created in 2016 by Jonathan M. Winer relating to
research compiled by Christopher Steele.

Winer passed along an early Steele report to Nuland on May 19, 2014.
It discusses Russia-Ukraine policy. Winer writes: “Toria, another
piece that is not in my lane but which I wished to pass on to you. My
friend Chris Steele (Orbis Intelligence, former MI-6 Russia expert),
provided me the enclosed memo yesterday, describing a recent
conversation (redacted) on Russian Ukraine policy. As I was provided
it from a person in private sector, I am treating it as low side.”

In a November 20, 2014, email exchange, Winer offers to
introduce Principle Deputy Assistant Secretary of State Paul Jones to
Steele while Steele was to be in town, and he provides Jones and
Nuland with three Steele reports, discussing: “Ukraine looking
towards [redacted]”; “Ukraine economy shrinking due to loss of
East [redacted]”; and “President Putin’s current priorities
[redacted].” Winer writes to Jones: Paul, if you are still free,
does 3 pm work to meet with Chris Steele? I would pick him up
downstairs, get him to your office, and sit in. Will be sending you
another Orbis report regardless in a few minutes, it just arrived but
I haven’t had chance to open it and manicure it yet.”

“The more we dig, the more access we see the disgraced spy behind
the ridiculous dossier had at State. And we're going to keep on
digging until we learn just how deep this went,” said Christopher
Bedford, editor in chief of The Daily Caller News Foundation.

The new documents show that on June 13, 2014, Winer forwarded to
Nuland a Steele report
[[link removed]]
on
the Russia-Ukraine crisis and the Kremlin being emboldened to
challenge U.S. sanctions.

Winer passed two Steele reports
[[link removed]]
to
Nuland on July 1, 2014, with one discussing someone claiming success
in the Russian-Ukraine crisis, and the other discussing the Crimea
annexation.

Winer sends an email
[[link removed]]
from
his verizon.net
[[link removed]]
account to his state.gov
[[link removed]]
account on July 11, 2014 under the subject
“Likely Measured Russian Response to Ukrainian Military, (redacted)
Orbis report. Winer writes: “I note in particular their focus on
sanctions and the fact that they are biting deep already, though maybe
someone should tell him that Administration doesn’t need Congress to
add to those…”

Winer passes to State Department Coordinator for Sanctions Policy
Daniel Fried on July 17, 2014 an Orbis report
[[link removed]]
on
the Russia-Ukraine Crisis and increasing hostilities.

On July 18, 2014, Winer passes to Nuland a Steele report
[[link removed]]
on
a (redacted) company avoiding U.S. sanctions and “the problem of
early warning of U.S. action.”

Winer passed Nuland a Steele report
[[link removed]]
on
Aug. 1, 2014 discussing “Early Russian Leadership Views on
Counter-Sanctions against the West.”

On August 29, 2014, Winer passes to Nuland three Steele reports
[[link removed]]
discussing:
Ukrainian views on a Poroshenko-Putin meeting in Minsk; Ukrainian
views on Russia’s military goal of a corridor to Crimea before
winter; and someone “still seeking bilateral Russia-UK Gas deal
despite conditions.”

On Aug. 29, 2014, Winer forwarded to Nuland a Steele report
[[link removed]]
discussing
the Ukrainian crisis and “Putin’s performance from within Russian
leadership.”

On September 11, 2014, Winer forwarded to Fried a Steele report
[[link removed]]
titled
“Moscow fears Western sanctions.”

On October 20, 2014, Winer sent to Nuland four Steele reports
[[link removed]]
dealing
with: Growing Kremlin frustration with Kiev and pro-Russian forces in
Ukraine; Petro Poroshenko’s efforts to secure victory in upcoming
parliamentary elections; Kiev’s view of international relations; and
efforts by a Kremlin owned insurance company, SOGAZ, to evade U.S.
sanctions.

On November 3, 2014, Winer forwarded to Nuland three reports
[[link removed]
One dealing with an early Kremlin reaction to the Ukrainian election
outcome; another discussing a gas negotiations deal; and the third
discussing Ukrainian internal politics and EU attitudes.

On November 7, 2014, Winer sends Nuland a Steele report
[[link removed]]
titled
“Signs of a more conciliatory Kremlin position” relating to the
Russia-Ukraine crisis.

On December 6, 2014, Winer forwarded Nuland a Steele report
[[link removed]]
about
Putin seeking a PR campaign designed to combat sanctions.

On December 11, 2014, Steele sent a report
[[link removed]]
to
Winer/Nuland about a Russian Central Bank warning to Putin that there
would be insufficient funds to support all “SOEs” hit by
sanctions.

On January 12, 2015, a Steele report
[[link removed]]
was
sent to Nuland and Winer discussing Ukraine’s worry that it would be
trade bait between the U.S. and Russia.

On February 16, 2015, Steele sent a report
[[link removed]]
to
Nuland and Winer about a company “secretly owned by Putin, Putin’s
mistress and friends.”

In a March 19, 2015, email thread
[[link removed]],
Winer and Nuland are forwarded Steele reports dealing with Ukraine
political instability and the possible return to power of Ukrainian
politician Yulia Tymoshenko.

On April 17, 2015, Nuland and Winer received two Steele reports
[[link removed]],
one related to why Russia was supplying Iran with missile defense, and
the other related to Russian exports of gas to Europe through Ukraine.

On June 19, 2015, Nuland and Winer received a Steele report
[[link removed]]
concerning
the likely political demise of Kazakhstan President Nursultan
Nazarbayev and his successor and the country’s geopolitical
reorientation toward China.

On July 6, 2015, Steele sent a report
[[link removed]]
to
Nuland and Winer about the “boozing” Ukrainian President Petro
Poroshenko struggling to deal with fellow oligarchs amid growing
dysfunction.

On August 19, 2015, Weiner and Nuland received another Steele report
[[link removed]]
related
to the possibility of a Ukrainian leader retaining a U.S. passport.

On November 5, 2015, Nuland sent colleague Geoffrey Pyatt three
Steele reports
[[link removed]]
dealing
with: Ukraine relations and military situation in eastern Ukraine;
Ukraine politics and elections; and President Poroshenko’s
“evolving constitutional agenda” and deepening partnership with
someone.

This is just the latest of many important revelations uncovered by our
massive investigation into the Clinton-funded, anti-Trump dossier and
its use to obtain FISA warrants in order to spy on the Trump campaign.
You can track our over 50 Deep State coup lawsuits on our new Internet
site at www.judicialwatch.org
[[link removed]].

Until next week …



[Contribute]
[[link removed]]


<a
href="[link removed]"
target="_blank"><img alt="WU01"
src="[link removed]"
style="width:100%; height:auto;" /></a>

[32x32x1]
[[link removed]]

[32x32x2]
[[link removed]]

[32x32x3]
[[link removed]]

[32x32x3]
[[link removed]]

Judicial Watch, Inc.
425 3rd St Sw Ste 800
Washington, DC 20024

202.646.5172



©2017-2019, All Rights Reserved
Manage Email Subscriptions
[[link removed]]
|
Unsubscribe
[[link removed]]

View in browser
[[link removed]]