Dear Friends,
In March 2020, the 21 youth plaintiffs in Juliana v. United States filed a petition for rehearing en banc with the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals. Supported by ten “friend of the court” amicus briefs - signed by 24 members of Congress, prominent experts in the fields of constitutional law, climate change, and public health, and several leading women’s, children’s, environmental, and human rights organizations - the petition asked the court to convene a new panel of 11 circuit court judges to review the sharply divided opinion from January 2020 in which the majority “reluctantly” decided federal courts do not have the power to remedy the plaintiffs’ injuries stemming directly from their government’s affirmative actions exacerbating the climate crisis.
Today, the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals, without explanation, denied the youth plaintiffs’ request to rehear their landmark constitutional climate lawsuit. While a judge did call for a vote on whether to rehear the case, a majority of non-recused judges voted no. The court does not tell you how the vote split. Because the court did not correct the significant legal errors made in the January 2020 ruling, we will now seek review in the U.S. Supreme Court. Our youth plaintiffs are also requesting that the Biden-Harris administration defendants and the Department of Justice agree to meet with the plaintiffs to discuss settling their claims through a decree of the court, and thereby protect their rights and the rights of all children to come.
The U.S. Supreme Court
The sharply divided decision of January 2020 cannot stand. It says that the courts are powerless to set constitutional parameters on what the political branches must and must not do to remedy the climate crisis. In the words of dissenting Judge Staton, it “throws up (the court’s) hands” in the face of humanity’s greatest existential crisis ever, and places that crisis solely in the hands of our ever changing political branches. Until the courts mandate the government stop perpetuating the climate crisis, youth and all humanity will face ever more threatening climate chaos. This is an enormous legal error, one that was not corrected today by the Ninth Circuit. It is now up to the U.S Supreme Court to correct these errors and protect the ability of federal courts to interpret the constitution and resolve controversies through a declaration of law. Or it is up to the Biden-Harris administration to resolve Plaintiffs’ claims and grant them the justice they seek in a binding agreement of the parties signed by the court.
|