[For today’s feminists, labor militants, and socialists, the
vision of feminist labor organizing that guided the women’s
white-collar organizing project 9to5 should still be our north star.]
[[link removed]]

PORTSIDE CULTURE

THE LABOR FEMINISM OF 9TO5 SHOULD GUIDE OUR ORGANIZING TODAY  
[[link removed]]


 

Marianela D’Aprile
February 1, 2021
Jacobin
[[link removed]]

*
[[link removed]]
*
[[link removed]]
*
* [[link removed]]

_ For today’s feminists, labor militants, and socialists, the
vision of feminist labor organizing that guided the women’s
white-collar organizing project 9to5 should still be our north star. _


Archival footage of women from the 9to5 Movement striking in the
1970s from the documentary 9to5: The Story of a Movement.,

 

t’s hard to imagine, but the zany 1980 fantasy-comedy film _9 to
5_, starring Dolly Parton, Jane Fonda, and Lily Tomlin, was initially
going to be a drama. When Fonda took on the project of making a movie
about the exploitation, harassment, abuse, and mistreatment women
suffered in the workplace, she approached it with all the seriousness
she thought the topic called for.

Fonda had been friends with Boston clerical worker and labor leader
Karen Nussbaum for years, having met in the anti–Vietnam War
movement, and Nussbaum kept her abreast of the state of things for
women workers. It was dire: women faced rampant sexism in the office,
were regularly passed over for job opportunities in favor of
less-qualified male counterparts, often made half of men’s salaries,
and had little to no protections at work.

In response, Nussbaum, along with fellow Harvard office worker Ellen
Cassedy, founded a Boston-based organization called 9to5 in 1972.
Growing out of a local newsletter titled _9to5: Newsletter for Boston
Area Office Workers_, 9to5 brought women office workers together to
organize for better conditions at work. They built a new model of
organizing, somewhere between the labor and women’s movements,
harnessing the energy behind rising feminist struggles while also
recognizing that women organizing as workers was essential and
powerful.

“On the one hand, we were building a wing of the women’s movement
that was for working women, who didn’t otherwise identify with the
women’s movement,” Nussbaum told me in an interview. (You can read
the interview in full here
[[link removed]].)
“This was a way to expand the women’s movement to a new group of
women who otherwise weren’t getting there. And we were bringing the
women’s movement into the labor movement. So we were trying to
create a home for working women in the women’s movement, and for
women in the labor movement.”

9to5 built a new model of organizing, somewhere between the labor and
women’s movements, harnessing the energy behind rising feminist
struggles while also recognizing that women organizing as workers was
essential and powerful.

To accomplish this, 9to5 appealed to women workers through tactics
full of humor and personal connection. They held mock contests, such
as one for the “pettiest office task,” once awarded to a secretary
who had to sew up the crotch of her boss’s pants while he was still
wearing them. They made up songs and funny slogans; one flyer featured
an illustration of a stick of dynamite struck in a high-heel shoe and
read “women in insurance: an explosive situation.” They
“pilloried these bosses by name,” as Nussbaum puts it. “We would
take the press with us to go announce who the bad boss was that
year.”

“We did things that were fun because we wanted to have fun,”
Nussbaum says. “It wasn’t a tactic so much as we wanted to build
the kind of organization we would want to join.”

The tongue-in-cheek-ness lowered the barrier of entry for the
white-collar workers 9to5 was organizing and made their message easier
to deliver. Upon seeing this and understanding its appeal, Fonda
quickly changed course: she would make an over-the-top comedy instead,
a kind of movie-length narrative that channeled the spirit of the
hilarious-yet-deadly-serious gags 9to5 was staging in the streets.

For the last four decades, that Hollywood film has been the principal
cultural production tying us back to that lost labor history. Now, a
new documentary, _9to5: The Story of a Movement_, directed by Julia
Reichert and Steven Bognar (directors of _American Factory_
[[link removed]]),
brings 9to5’s history to us in full detail. The documentary offers a
history of the kind of class-rooted feminist struggle that socialists
should take up today.

Feminist Victories That Endure

9to5 started by pressuring the state to enforce affirmative action and
set new regulations against gender discrimination. Eventually, they
began taking direct action against companies: in 1975, after
discovering through a survey issued by 9to5 that Boston publishing
companies were paying women significantly less than men, they issued a
class-action lawsuit for gender and racial discrimination.

In _Knocking on Labor’s Door_
[[link removed]],
labor historian Lane Windham
[[link removed]],
who provides historical commentary in the documentary, writes that
“companies were shocked by the lawsuits, which seemed to come out of
the blue in an industry that was not unionized and was not used to any
sort of worker collective action.”

Archival footage from the documentary 9to5: The Story of a Movement.

Eventually, the association affiliated with SEIU to form sister union
Local 925 and later grew into a national association called 9to5:
National Association of Working Women. By 1981, organizers had also
formed SEIU District 925, representing office and clerical workers
nationally. This dual-organization model allowed 9to5 to recruit women
potentially wary of joining a union in a male-dominated labor
movement.

Windham posits, and Nussbaum agrees, that while 9to5 did not achieve
their original goal of “seeding” the labor movement with militant
women workers, they did transform women’s treatment in the
workplace. Years of organizing for better benefits, equal wages, and
“raises not roses” (a reference to the office custom of giving
roses to secretaries on their work anniversary), resulted not only in
material wins for women workers, but also in a significant cultural
shift in women’s expectations for how they deserved to be treated at
work.

 

The documentary cleverly juxtaposes 9to5’s victories with scenes
from television shows from the era, including one that shows a
disgustingly lecherous male boss chasing his terrified secretary
around a desk as a supposedly humorous gag.

Those cultural shifts — basic respect for women workers on the job,
ending scrutiny of women’s bodies in the workplace, curbing the
scourge of casual sexual harassment — were able to endure, Nussbaum
told me, even though many of 9to5’s economic wins were beaten back.

Cultural changes “couldn’t be resisted, because there was a lot of
organizing behind them, but the economic changes were smashed, and
economic power was gone after in a very serious way. The ’70s saw
the rise of the working women’s movement and the rise of the union
busting movement at the same time.”

The Hollywood movie played a huge role in effecting this cultural
shift. _9 to 5 _follows the story of three office workers — Judy
Bernly (a dowdy Jane Fonda in her Sunday best), Doralee Rhodes (Dolly
Parton, in her big-screen debut), and Violet Newstead (Lily Tomlin,
tough and pissed off as ever) — who kidnap their boss and take over
the management of their office after a series of mishaps leads them to
believe Violet is responsible for their boss’s near-death.

Jane Fonda, Lily Tomlin, and Dolly Parton in the film 9 to 5 (1980).

The movie holds up, both because we’re still suffering so much of
the same bullshit at work, and because it’s an absolute trip. It
captures the common, horrendous sexist indignities of work, like how
everyone in the office thinks Doralee is sleeping with the boss, at
the same time that it shows the quick solidarity built when people
decide to team up against their common enemy. In the scene that
unleashes the real rising action of the film, Violet gets a joint from
her son and invites Judy and Doralee to an “old fashioned ladies’
pot party.”

High off their asses, they each fantasize about what they’d do to
Hart. Violet, dressed as Snow White and with the help of some little
blue cartoon birds, puts poison in Hart’s coffee, then pushes an
incapacitated Hart out the office window. Wearing a shiny ’80s
cowgirl get-up, her hair a fluffy white pouf on top of her head,
Doralee sits behind Hart’s desk and flips the script on him: she
tells him to turn around so she can “check out his bod,” orders
him to “take it off” (“it” being his necktie), and then walks
around the desk, right up to Hart, puts her hand behind his head, and
presses it into her cleavage.

When he tries to run away, she lassos him as an off-screen voice
narrates the scene as though it were a real, live rodeo: “Let’s
see how long it takes you to hog-tie this sexist, egotistical, lying,
hypocritical bigot.” For her part, Judy catches Hart in his darkened
office. Holding a rifle, ammo strips crossing her chest, her voice a
cool, cooing octave lower than in the rest of the movie, she tells
Hart: “You’re a wart on the nose of humanity, and I’m going to
blast it off.” She does.

The fantasy ends up coming true. When, after ending up in the
hospital, Hart finds out (through office manager and class traitor
Roz) that Violet had accidentally put rat poison in his coffee, our
three heroines have no choice but to kidnap him to shut him up.
Doralee hog-ties him in his office with a phone cord. When he tries to
get away, Judy shoots him with a small pistol she finds in Doralee’s
purse.

The three get a taste of revenge — and they want more. When they
learn Hart has been committing fraud, they set out to find hard
documents to prove it, and buy themselves time by setting up a complex
contraption to keep Hart in his room that involves a motorized garage
door opener and a leather dog collar. It’s a BDSM fantasy with all
of the sadism and none of the sex.

In Hart’s absence (during which no one misses him; in fact, no one
seems to know what he had done all day), the trio takes over the
workplace. Of course, they know the ins and outs of the office, know
exactly what each worker needs and how to make it happen. They
institute flexible schedules and job-sharing, which allow women with
children to work and be able to spend time with their kids. They
repaint the office lockers from a drab gray to a cheery yellow and
give everyone raises.

Eventually, the boss comes back and tries to take credit for the
changes but cannot. After years of getting passed over in favor of men
she trained herself, Violet is finally promoted.

We’re meant to see that as a victory, and in 1980, when the film
came out, it was. Few women could have dreamed of such professional
success before. But the opportunities for ascension by women in the
workplace since second-wave feminism lay bare the progress made by the
feminist movement and its limitations: now we are liberated to be
exploited by women bosses.

Of course, feminist and labor organizers in the 1970s and ’80s faced
giant obstacles in the face of a newly vicious attack on workers by
the rich, and anti-communism amid the Cold War. They made a wager: go
for what’s winnable, bring in as many people as possible, build the
movements, and make change.

Meanwhile, the bosses made wagers, too: if they let enough educated
women into the higher echelons of the workforce, gave them access to
good jobs and better pay, that they could take enough steam out of the
organizing women were doing in the labor movement to neutralize it.

“There was all this pressure on employers, as well as lawsuits and
demands for unionization,” Nussbaum tells me.

By 1980, employers decided they would use a safety valve. They decide
to give on the issues of promotions and letting women in on the good
jobs. So women, particularly white, middle-class and
upper-middle-class women, over the next decade or two become managers
and professionals. They split the workforce. They split the
college-educated women, give them opportunities and shut them up, and
downgrade work for the rest, for working-class women.

This split remains today. The break-through-the-glass-ceiling feminism
of the 80s and 90s that got Violet her promotion made wins for some
women and left others in the same, or worse, shape than before. The
vestiges of this remain with us today in the form of boss-bitch
feminism: the exaltation of women CEOs, the calls to “lean in” to
get ahead at work, the insistence that you can “do it all,” on
your own, without a man, without anyone, in fact. It’s a feminism
that’s both gender-essentialist, in its reinforcing of men and women
as two competing and intractable categories, and anti-solidaristic.

While working-class women got stuck with low wages, bad benefits, and
less collective power, the women who were able to break through to the
better jobs became, as Nussbaum puts it, “individually self-reliant
but collectively powerless.”

Still, 9to5 was able to make huge gains for women in the workplace.
The Reichert and Bognar documentary makes that clear, showing how
women who had never organized before were able to find their voice and
power through collective action. Verna Barksdale, a 9to5 organizer in
Atlanta, describes the tasks of the organization as “not only
fighting for employee rights, but having women develop themselves.”

Through this investment, and through their fight for material
improvements in the workplace, 9to5 was able to bring an end to the
humiliating and degrading conditions that had marked women’s working
lives for decades. No longer did they have to simultaneously be doting
mother, caring daughter, and sexualized plaything for their bosses
just to eke out a living. Those changes have lasted until today. But
their work remains incomplete. When Cassedy and Nussbaum started 9to5,
they had a vision for a “big, national mass-based organization”
that would bridge racial differences and espouse the values of the
feminist movement while flexing the power of organized labor. For
today’s new generation of feminists, labor militants, and
socialists, that vision should still be our north star.

SHARE THIS ARTICLE
Facebook
Twitter
Email

ABOUT THE AUTHOR

Marianela D’Aprile is a writer in Chicago. She is a member of the
Democratic Socialists of America’s National Political Committee.

* SUBSCRIBE [[link removed]]
* DONATE [[link removed]]

OUR NEW ISSUE, “BIDEN OUR TIME,” WILL BE OUT SOON.
WE’LL DISCUSS THE LAST FOUR CHAOTIC YEARS OF US POLITICS, WHAT
HAPPENED IN NOVEMBER, AND WHAT TO EXPECT FROM THE INCOMING BIDEN
ADMINISTRATION. GET A $20 DISCOUNTED PRINT SUBSCRIPTION TODAY
[[link removed]]!

*
[[link removed]]
*
[[link removed]]
*
* [[link removed]]

 

 

 

INTERPRET THE WORLD AND CHANGE IT

 

 

Submit via web [[link removed]]
Submit via email
Frequently asked questions [[link removed]]
Manage subscription [[link removed]]
Visit portside.org [[link removed]]

Twitter [[link removed]]

Facebook [[link removed]]

 



########################################################################

[link removed]

To unsubscribe from the xxxxxx list, click the following link:
[link removed]