SF Chronicle: Heather Knight took San Francisco to task for falling behind Sacramento, a city that recently passed legislation allowing fourplexes to be constructed in lots zoned for single-detached homes. JK Dineen followed with a story that points out the status quo in San Francisco: concentrating development in the city's Eastern Neighborhoods. In response, I wrote a Letter to the Editor urging the Board of Supervisors to pass legislation allowing for multifamily homes to be built across the city and targeting the Westside for development.
Knight later reported Supervisor Mandelman is introducing two pieces of housing legislation soon, one making it harder to build giant homes in multifamily zoned lots and another allowing fourplexes on corner lots and within a half mile of fare-gated transit stations throughout the city. SF YIMBY believes both are a good step forward but that the Board of Supervisors could be bolder and use its power to allow a citywide upzoning.
SF Weekly: Benjamin Schneider wrote in SF Weekly about the Bay Area's Regional Housing Needs Allocation (RHNA), how cities must change their zoning laws to allow for at least 441,000 new homes to be built throughout the region. Schneider does a great job covering the complicated subject of beefed-up state law mandating #moreHOMES this RHNA cycle.
SF Examiner: Carly Graf dove into the housing discourse at SF Examiner, rightfully pointing out that current legislation puts Eastern Neighborhood homes at risk of demolition and 30,000-plus residents at risk of displacement but failing to consider that, again, the Board of Supervisors has the power to rezone the entire city and develop amenity-rich Westside neighborhoods.