In the most recent data from EDD, California paid out a total of $114 billion in benefits under all the UI programs through the period March 7 through January 16. While the various emergency programs including PUA and extended payments under both the regular program and the new PEUC component paid from federal dollars, the regular UI program relies on the state’s UI account funded by employer contributions per employee. When the balance of that fund runs out, benefits continue to be paid through borrowing from the federal trust account.
The most recent data from US Department of Labor indicates California’s outstanding loans from the Federal Unemployment Account were $18.6 billion, or 39% of the total amount owed by 19 states. This amount does not include accumulated interest which under the second COVID relief bill is currently waived through March 14. In the previous recession that began in 2008, the state UI fund reached a negative balance of $11.1 billion, and did not return to a positive balance until the first quarter of 2018. Even under the current conditions, the deficit is already approaching twice that amount. The UI program at its essence was developed as insurance against economic cycles and individual firm cycles. Its funding structure was not designed to insure
against the current circumstances which are a government-ordered series of shutdowns intended to cope with a public health emergency. The governor’s proposed budget acknowledges these circumstances by including $555 million general fund to cover the anticipated interest payment that will be due in September 2021.
Estimates of how much of this funding has been diverted and wasted by fraud continue to rise. The first indications claimed known fraud at about $1 billion by state prisoners. Over the ensuing weeks, additional revelations have come to light with the latest potential total now pegged at $30.4 billion, composed of 9.7% ($11.0 billion) of known fraud in payments made to date and another 17% of payments ($19.0 billion) made to potentially fraudulent claims.
While it remains highly uncertain how much if any of that $30.4 billion can be recovered, other administrative decisions by EDD now put workers who otherwise followed the rules at risk for having to repay a portion of the benefits they have received. As detailed by the State Auditor in their recent report, EDD at the direction of the Secretary of the Labor and Workforce Development Agency suspended two requirements in order to reduce EDD’s workload: (1) EDD was directed to pay benefits prior to eligibility determination while the requirement for claimants to submit the required certifications was suspended and (2) the requirement that benefit recipients submit recertifications every other two weeks was also suspended.
The first action affects an estimated 2.4 million workers; the second an estimated 1.7 million. Because the underlying federal requirements were still in place, EDD must now go back to these claims, complete the required determinations, and also determine any estimated overpayments. This additional workload will add to an already over-stretched agency and affect the final numbers on the growing debt now allocated to the state fund. More critically, this process means that millions of state workers who have struggled through the state’s shifting rules affecting their jobs directly may now be faced with the added burden of repaying some of the benefits on which they have relied—even though they faithfully followed the state rules as they were told to do so by EDD while billions instead were readily siphoned off through fraud.
|