When we think of the fundamental ideals on which the American republic is based, we tend to think of liberty and justice for all, equality under the law, and representative government. We don't often think of accountability. But in a sense, accountability underlies and supports all the others. First and foremost, we're accountable to ourselves in a system of self-rule. It's on us to make the most of our natural rights, hopefully to build a good life for ourselves, our families, and our communities. If we fail to do so, there are consequences. We must demand the same of our elected leaders. Our failure to hold them accountable, under the flimsy guise of "healing" and "moving on," endangers our national well-being no less than our personal failures endanger our own. Americans have taken different paths to realizing that the Republican Party, in its current state, is largely bereft of accountability. No matter how or when we reached that conclusion, we need to work together with all who are now committed to a new direction based on principles and the national interest. —Evan McMullin

Welcome to all of our new readers. We're glad you're here! Please help us spread the word about THE TOPLINE by sharing it here.
Shareable version

'Heightened threat environment'

Yesterday's alert from the Department of Homeland Security, warning of an ongoing threat of domestic terrorism from far-right extremists, was sobering but not surprising. Various militia groups, helped along by Donald Trump's rhetoric, have been radicalizing and prepping adherents for violence for months. Just yesterday, three self-styled militia members, all U.S. military veterans, were charged in the Jan. 6 attack on the U.S. Capitol. They began soliciting and training recruits within days of the 2020 presidential election, later organizing travel to Washington, D.C., for the insurrectionists as well as trucks of weapons. —The Washington Post

MORE: Catherine Buni & Soraya Chemaly: The science that explains Trump's grip on white males —Scientific American

Sargent: The delicate balance of dealing with domestic terrorism

"With the new administration preparing to focus on domestic extremist activity, doing this right will mean taking extraordinary care not to overreach and/or radicalize people further. This means intelligence and law enforcement absolutely cannot in any way be used to denigrate or target legitimate political activity. Such overreach is a serious danger with a long history in the United States, and we need to guard against it strenuously. What this latest bulletin hints at is how incredibly complex and difficult getting this balance right is going to be." —Greg Sargent in The Washington Post

Greg Sargent is a Washington Post opinion columnist covering national politics. He is the author of "An Uncivil War: Taking Back Our Democracy in an Age of Trumpian Disinformation and Thunderdome Politics."

MORE: Extremists emboldened by Capitol attack pose rising threat, Homeland Security says —The New York Times

An 'alternative' to impeachment?

Sens. Tim Kaine and Susan Collins are drafting a proposal to censure Donald Trump and may introduce the resolution on the Senate floor next week. As it appears increasingly unlikely that 17 Republicans would vote to convict Trump in an impeachment trial, the censure would impose "a similar consequence but it does not require a trial and it does not require a two-thirds vote," Kaine said.

MORE: Democratic House staffers draft letter to senators on impeachment: Convict Trump 'for our sake, and the sake of the country' —CNN

'Her very presence in office represents a direct threat'

Rep. Jimmy Gomez of California announced yesterday that he will introduce a resolution to expel Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene of Georgia from Congress after reports surfaced that Greene had previously called for violence against Democrats on social media. The measure is one of the starkest rebukes yet against the freshman congresswoman, who has flouted congressional coronavirus guidelines, denied the presidential election results, actively spread QAnon conspiracy theories, called the Parkland school shooting a "false flag" operation, and made racist, Islamophobic, and anti-Semitic comments. —Politico

MORE: Republicans back away from confronting Trump and his loyalists after the Capitol insurrection, embracing them instead —The Washington Post

SHARE TOPLINE ON TWITTER SHARE TOPLINE ON TWITTER

Douglas: Don't let election losers make voting harder

"State-level attacks on the right to vote call for a bipartisan commitment to democracy, which means full participation in our elections. We should strive for high turnout and determine our leaders based on who receives the most votes, not which party's voters have the easiest path to the ballot box. We must eliminate gerrymandering and manipulation of Electoral College rules that entrench minority control." —Joshua Douglas on CNN

Joshua Douglas is a law professor at the University of Kentucky J. David Rosenberg College of Law. He is the author of "Vote for US: How to Take Back Our Elections and Change the Future of Voting."

MORE: State GOP introduces controversial election reform bill —The Badger Herald

Focus on election interference

An arrest in Florida yesterday marks a potentially tectonic shift in how the federal government enforces laws against election interference. Douglass Mackey, known better as his alter ego, Ricky Vaughn, has been charged with election interference for running a voter disinformation campaign during the 2016 presidential election.

MORE: How much did COVID-19 affect the 2020 election? —FiveThirtyEight

Ibrahim: Time for democracies to get tough

"[T]he West is doing nothing but playing defense and poorly at that. All that happens is the West occasionally pointing out that some Facebook page or other was maintained by Russia's troll farms—giving no incentive to them and other enemies to stop. To end assaults on democracy from outside—and to give the space to concentrate on attacks from within—Western governments must impose proportional costs on foreign actors." —Azeem Ibrahim in Foreign Policy

Azeem Ibrahim is a director at the Center for Global Policy in Washington.

MORE: World leaders are worried Trump 'permanently' damaged democracy, EU chief says —Business Insider

I have made the decision that if the Republicans in the Senate do not vote for impeachment, I will not consider voting for any Republican candidate. To borrow an overused cliche, the Republican Party will be dead to me. That does not mean I will necessarily vote for the Democrat, but that I will only consider independents or candidates from parties other than the Republican Party. I cannot vote for a candidate that puts party above the country. I am so hoping that a new conservative party will form that will follow what it says—something the Republicans have not done for a long time. A party that will honor the Constitution and work for the people. —Thomas A., Oregon

Perhaps we—you, with your platform—should now push the 45 "Republican” U.S. senators who voted "against" Trump's impeachment trial to ultimately not vote on the "unconstitutional" conviction. —Mickey D., Oklahoma

The views expressed in "What's Your Take?" are submitted by readers and do not necessarily reflect the views of the editorial staff or the Stand Up Republic Foundation.

Got feedback about THE TOPLINE? Send it to Melissa Amour, Managing Editor, at [email protected].

Did you receive this email from a friend? Sign up at www.thetopline.com.
CARE ABOUT DEMOCRACY? SHARE SOME DEMOCRACY.

If you love THE TOPLINE, share it with your friends and reap the rewards—from a shoutout in an issue of TL, to exclusive swag, to a call with Evan and Mindy.

Your Dashboard has everything you need to easily share THE TOPLINE
and track your progress.
VISIT YOUR DASHBOARD NOW
TO GET STARTED!
The Topline is a project of the Stand Up Republic Foundation.
 
Want to change how you receive these emails?
You can update your preferences or unsubscribe from this list.

700 Pennsylvania Ave SE · Washington, DC 20003-2493 · USA