The announcement yesterday that Sen. Rob Portman will not seek re-election in two years does not bode well for the future of the Republican Party. Like Jeff Flake and others before him, Portman is becoming marginalized within a party that once stood for limited government, fiscal responsibility, and traditional American values. Trading all of that for a personality cult has left the party increasingly overrun by charlatans, conspiracy theorists, and opportunists who scoff at the concepts of unifying leadership and responsible, competent governance. Where does that leave principled and former Republicans? Uniting with other Americans to oppose a demagogue was an easy call, but where will those opposed to the current direction of the GOP ultimately land? The question of whether to stay and fight for the Republican Party, move on to something new, or do something in between is now being considered by many. Time will tell, but Portman's departure certainly highlights the need for a greater effort to support honorable leadership on the right. —Evan McMullin

Welcome to all of our new readers. We're glad you're here! Please help us spread the word about THE TOPLINE by sharing it here.
Shareable version

The second time around

The impeachment managers from the House of Representatives formally delivered Donald Trump's second impeachment charge to the Senate last night, triggering the trial that will determine whether Trump is convicted of inciting the insurrection at the U.S. Capitol on Jan. 6. Rep. Jamie Raskin read the full article of impeachment into the record. Usually, a Senate trial determines whether a president can remain in office following impeachment, but since Trump's term has already ended, the trial will determine whether he can hold federal elective office in the future. The trial will begin on Feb. 8. —Forbes

MORE: Jane Chong: The Senate trial will test whether Republicans care even about themselves —The Atlantic

Rubin: A message to retiring Republicans

"[Y]ou cannot undo the past four years, much as you might regret your reticence in standing up to an authoritarian narcissist and his enablers. You can leave the Senate on a high note, freeing your party from dependency on an anti-democratic bully and ending its reliance on voter suppression and legislative obstruction. If you choose to, you can leave a Senate record you are proud of and a legacy of achievement." —Jennifer Rubin in The Washington Post

Jennifer Rubin is an attorney and political opinion columnist at The Washington Post.

This week in DC...

The week got off to a productive start in the nation's capital on the first Monday of the Biden Administration. Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell finally relented last night on a power-sharing deal after Democratic Sens. Joe Manchin and Kyrsten Sinema confirmed that they would not nix the 60-vote legislative filibuster—a sticking point for McConnell. Talks had been at a standstill for days over how to organize an evenly split 50-50 Senate, where Democrats hold the majority because Vice President Kamala Harris can break a tie. The standoff kept the chamber in an odd state of limbo where Democrats have the majority but Republicans control the committees. —The Hill

MORE: Senate confirms Antony Blinken as 71st secretary of state —The Boston Globe

Covid travel restrictions reinstated

President Biden will sign executive action reinstating COVID-19 travel restrictions on non-U.S. travelers from Brazil, Ireland, the United Kingdom, and 26 other European countries that allow travel across open borders. White House Press Sec. Jen Psaki also confirmed that South Africa would be added to the restricted list because of concerns about a worrisome new variant of the virus in that country. "This isn't the time to be lifting restrictions on international travel," Psaki said. Top U.S. infectious disease expert Dr. Anthony Fauci concurred, calling Biden's decision "prudent." —CBS News

MORE: Should you wear two masks? Here's what Dr. Fauci says —Deseret News

SHARE TOPLINE ON TWITTER SHARE TOPLINE ON TWITTER

Kovalev: Why the Navalny protests should worry Putin

"[T]he protests emerged from—and revealed—the impotence of the [Russian] government. To its discontented citizens it fails to offer anything but crude force and conspiracy theories. (Navalny is often depicted as a foreign agent, and protests as financed by 'the West.') There’s no vision of the future and little effort in the present to improve people's lives, now worsened by the pandemic." —Alexey Kovalev in The New York Times

Alexey Kovalev is the investigations editor at Meduza, an independent Russian news outlet.

MORE: Biden, in first call with Putin, presses on Navalny, treaty —Associated Press

Focus on the post-Trump GOP

If the Republican Party has any plans to extricate itself from Trumpism, you wouldn't know it by observing the state party organizations. The Arizona GOP just re-elected divisive Chair Kelli Ward and censured Republican Gov. Doug Ducey. The Hawaii Republican Party has suggested that adherents of the QAnon conspiracy theory are merely engaging in misguided patriotism. And last week, the Oregon GOP condemned the 10 House Republicans who voted to impeach Donald Trump and called the siege of the Capitol a "false flag" operation. Ugh. What else is happening in this very divided party? —The Washington Post

Noel: Will Republicans agree to disagree over democracy?

"Perhaps the pro-democracy Republicans' best bet is to tell their seditionist fellow party members the truth about the 2020 election. Republican voters will not listen if Democrats tell them that the vote was not fraudulent. But they may listen to an intraparty debate in which Republicans vigorously defend the right to vote, even if it means losing elections. Or perhaps they won't listen. But the party has to have that debate." —Hans Noel in The Atlantic

Hans Noel is an associate professor at Georgetown University's Department of Government.

Yesterday, the U.S. Supreme Court summarily dismissed all emoluments cases against President Trump, voiding all lower court decisions in the process. The underlying issues that brought the case to court remain unresolved and could easily be forgotten until some future president violates them again. Clearly, Congress must enact statutory provisions for enforcement of the clause, including explicit provisions for how a complaint is brought, investigatory authorities and obligations, subpoena power for investigators, and an enforceable means of sanctioning violations without needing to resort to the impeachment process. We have to assume that Trump will not be the last to abuse the office in this way and take steps to equip every future Congress to act. —Mike A., Maryland

The views expressed in "What's Your Take?" are submitted by readers and do not necessarily reflect the views of the editorial staff or the Stand Up Republic Foundation.

Got feedback about THE TOPLINE? Send it to Melissa Amour, Managing Editor, at [email protected].

Did you receive this email from a friend? Sign up at www.thetopline.com.
CARE ABOUT DEMOCRACY? SHARE SOME DEMOCRACY.

If you love THE TOPLINE, share it with your friends and reap the rewards—from a shoutout in an issue of TL, to exclusive swag, to a call with Evan and Mindy.

Your Dashboard has everything you need to easily share THE TOPLINE
and track your progress.
VISIT YOUR DASHBOARD NOW
TO GET STARTED!
The Topline is a project of the Stand Up Republic Foundation.
 
Want to change how you receive these emails?
You can update your preferences or unsubscribe from this list.

700 Pennsylvania Ave SE · Washington, DC 20003-2493 · USA