From David Dayen, The American Prospect <[email protected]>
Subject First 100: Rep. Pascrell Asks Biden to Fire the Postal Service Board | Senate Dealing and More Vaccines
Date January 26, 2021 5:07 PM
  Links have been removed from this email. Learn more in the FAQ.
  Links have been removed from this email. Learn more in the FAQ.
View this email in your browser

January 26, 2021

Congressman Pascrell to Biden: Fire the Postal Service Board

Plus, Senate dealing and a higher vaccine target

 

Postal Service delivery times actually went down after the election.
(STRF/STAR MAX/IPx 2020)

The Chief

"Title 39, Section 202A," Rep. Bill Pascrell (D-NJ) said to me,
unprompted. He was referring to a part of the United States Code
regarding the U.S.
Postal Service Board of Governors, the 11 members who operate as kind of
a board of directors for one of the nation's largest employers. The
brief section Pascrell wanted me to pay attention to reads as follows:
"The Governors shall represent the public interest generally." It is
their "top responsibility," Pascrell told me. "It says it right in
there."

Those governors can be fired by the president, but only for cause.
Pascrell believes there's a good cause: destroying the Postal Service.
And yesterday he sent a letter
to
President Biden, asking him to fire the board. (Fortunately he sent it
electronically, so the letter arrived on time.)

Nine of the eleven board members are appointed by the president; the
other two are the Postmaster General (currently, the dishonorable Louis
DeJoy) and their deputy. Members of the Board of Governors hire the
Postmaster General; a new board could fire the Postmaster General, and
reverse the corporate management actions

that have degraded the institution significantly over DeJoy's tenure.

But the governors are culpable as well, Pascrell believes. They hired
DeJoy, and they stood idly by as he instituted his strategy, which not
only weakened the Postal Service but rather explicitly tried to sabotage
it during a presidential election that was going to be predicated on
mail-in voting. "The board members' refusal to oppose the worst
destruction ever inflicted on the Postal Service was a betrayal of their
duties and unquestionably constitutes good cause for their removal,"
Pascrell wrote.

**Read all of our First 100 reports here**

Click to Support The American Prospect

Then-president Trump, said in August

of last year that, if he opposed additional funding for the Postal
Service in a pandemic relief bill, "that means you can't have
universal mail-in voting because they're not equipped to have it."
There was a fairly obvious shift in strategy regarding how the mail
would be carried, initiated by DeJoy, a large Trump donor. The evidence
is somewhat circumstantial but the results were clear: the mail was
slowing down, right in time for the election.

Judges stepped in and mitigated some of this damage for mail-in ballots
and the election. But the problem grew worse

after the election, during the holiday season. By late December, only 64
percent of first-class mail was being delivered on time. "I send out
4,000 Christmas cards every year," Pascrell told me. "We pay for
that ourselves. My cards were delivered to the post office in Virginia
on December 1. Most of the people in New Jersey got their card in
January."

Pascrell has been a longtime supporter of the Postal Service. He's
written at length

about its central importance in our commercial and social lives, and how
it can thrive again. In August he sought indictments
in
New Jersey against DeJoy and Trump for election subversion. He has
spoken eloquently about the residual damage of the Postal Service's
decay: Small businesses wrecked by uncertain delivery times, seniors
seeing their medications delayed. He has made recommendations, including
changes to how the Postal Service budgets for 75 years of pre-funded
retirement benefits, in proposed legislation.

This latest recommendation falls squarely within the law: the president
can absolutely fire Postal Service board members for cause. "Doing
nothing while the post office is dismantled is cause," Pascrell said.
A new board could fire DeJoy, and start fresh. The Senate can confirm
new board members by a majority vote, and Democrats are united on the
Postal Service. (If you wanted to do this faster, you could leave one
Governor behind-former Obama manufacturing czar Rom Bloom
,
perhaps-to fire DeJoy.)

Support Independent, Fact-Checked Journalism

The issue actually got a mention at the White House press briefing
yesterday. "It's an interesting question," said press secretary
Jen Psaki. "We all love the mailman and mailwoman."

Pascrell told me that his office has been in touch with the White House
about the issue. "They're looking at the history of it," he said.
"It wasn't exactly on the top of their agenda." While he
acknowledged the full plate for the president, he cast his request as
critical for accountability. After all, when you're talking about
deliberate sabotage of the tools to run an election, Pascrell said,
"if that's not sedition then what the hell is?"

In his letter, Pascrell framed the issue as a matter of public trust.
Many people have no greater interaction with the government on a daily
basis than with the post office. (If Biden thinks there's a rural
crisis
,
for example, fixing the post office, a signature institution of rural
America, should be a top priority.) It has served as an economic and
social engine since before there was a Constitution. Biden has talked
about building back better and making a tangible difference in
people's lives. Restoring the post office would be one of the most
high-profile ways to do that. And exacting accountability for the sins
of the past would push in that direction.

"I mean what I say," Pascrell assured me. "Nobody's going to
shut me up about it."

We Depend on Your Donations

Lightning Round

A lot of things mentioned in yesterday's First 100 got cleared up, so
let's whip through them:

The Senate: Mitch McConnell backed down
on his
demand that the Senate's organizing resolution include language on
keeping the filibuster intact. He tried to play it off that he got
public "assurances" on the filibuster from Sens. Joe Manchin

(D-WV) and Kyrsten Sinema

(D-AZ), and that was enough. But they were already on record against
changes, and will be until enough Republican obstruction changes their
mind. The point is that McConnell wanted it in writing in the organizing
resolution, and Chuck Schumer wouldn't give it to him. And so
McConnell caved.

The vaccine: President Biden, who had stuck with his 1 million/day pace
for vaccinations, yesterday upped it after press questioning

to 1.5 million/day. Good news that the goal is being set more in line
with the actual need and the reality of how shots have been progressing
(another 1.2 million yesterday
.)

The relief bill: Schumer is moving toward budget reconciliation

for more pandemic relief, rather than waiting around for non-existent
bipartisanship. Reconciliation, of course, is a protracted process
,
and I've been advocating that you get a chunk of relief through
regular order, with two things that can pass the Senate-checks and
shots
.
Biden appeared to shut that down yesterday. "I'm reluctant to cherry
pick and take out one or two items," he told reporters. "They go,
sort of, hand in glove, each of these issues."

If that's his prerogative and it just means one big reconciliation
bill, it's a missed opportunity to deliver relief quickly, as was
promised. But if Biden's open to the Senate nickel and diming the bill
,
particularly Senators who are highly unlikely to vote for the finished
product, that's a huge mistake. The bill is popular
.
Make Republicans vote against it, and then get all you can by whatever
process available. Negotiating with yourself makes no sense.

Donations Are Tax Deductible

What Day of Biden's Presidency Is It?

Day 7. We're still in Biden's self-imposed 10-day window of
executive actions; today's will focus on racial equity. He will also
"deliver remarks on the fight to contain the COVID-19 pandemic."

We Can't Do This Without You

Today I Learned

* A good thread on what's going on with yesterday's Buy American
order from Todd Tucker
. (Twitter)

* Meet the Ricchetti brothers
-one
a lobbyist-turned-Biden-aide, the other still a lobbyist getting a ton
of new clients because, well, his brother's a Biden aide. (Wall Street
Journal)

* States are easing COVID restrictions

just as the new variant emerges. Forget Congressional Republicans, this
is the biggest Biden sabotage. (Bloomberg)

* Biden will reopen the Obamacare marketplaces

for enrollment and possibly undo the Medicaid work requirement option.
(Seattle Times)

* He's also moving toward a ban on new oil and gas leases

on federal land. (New York Times)

* With 20 percent of renters behind on payments
,
and not enough rental assistance in the pipeline, cancellation needs to
be on the table. (CNBC)

* Relatedly, a new paper shows that reducing evictions and utility
shut-offs in the pandemic saved thousands of lives
.
(NBER)

* An under-the-radar Biden fight will be hospital price transparency
.
(Washington Post)

**Click the social links below to share this newsletter**

 

[link removed]

 

[link removed]

 

[link removed]

 

[link removed]

 

[link removed]

 

[link removed]

YOUR TAX DEDUCTIBLE DONATION SUPPORTS INDEPENDENT JOURNALISM

Copyright (C) 2021 The American Prospect. All rights reserved.
_________________

Sent to [email protected]

Unsubscribe:
[link removed]

The American Prospect, Inc., 1225 I Street NW, Suite 600, Washington, DC xxxxxx, United States
Screenshot of the email generated on import

Message Analysis