Tolerance cuts both ways.

View this email in your browser ([link removed])
[link removed]



** For Immediate Release: January 21, 2021
------------------------------------------------------------


** Rutherford Institute Defends First Amendment Rights of Firefighter Fired for Criticizing Defaced Public Monuments
------------------------------------------------------------

RICHMOND, Va. — Denouncing a politically correct “cancel culture” that punishes anyone who voices opinions that challenge prevailing views, The Rutherford Institute has come to the defense of a firefighter who was fired for condemning the vandalism of a public monument ([link removed]) on social media.

Attorneys for The Rutherford Institute filed a First Amendment lawsuit ([link removed]) on behalf of Jon Reinmuth, a firefighter with the Henrico County, who lost his job after criticizing the local school district for posting on its Facebook page a photograph that appeared to glorify the defacement of the Robert E. Lee Monument, which had been covered in graffiti, including anti-racist slogans and messages. The lawsuit alleges that the County and officials deprived Reinmuth of his right to free speech and seeks his reinstatement and back pay.

Affiliate attorney Tim Coffield assisted with the First Amendment lawsuit, Reinmuth v. County of Henrico ([link removed]) .

“Tolerance cuts both ways. It isn’t always an easy pill to swallow, but that’s the way free speech is supposed to work, especially when it comes to tolerating speech that we may disagree with,” said constitutional attorney John W. Whitehead, president of The Rutherford Institute and author of Battlefield America: The War on the American People ([link removed]) . “Remember, the First Amendment is a steam valve. It allows people to speak their minds, air their grievances and contribute to a larger dialogue that hopefully results in a more just world. Silencing unpopular viewpoints by shouting them down, censoring them, or criminalizing them is like removing the steam valve. Without it, frustration builds, anger grows and people become more volatile.”
MAKE THE GOVERNMENT PLAY BY THE RULES OF THE CONSTITUTION: SUPPORT THE FIGHT FOR FREEDOM ([link removed])

In May 2020, demonstrations and unrest broke out nationwide in the wake of the death of George Floyd at the hands of police. In Richmond, Va., demonstrators focused their outrage on several statues erected on Monument Avenue, including the Robert E. Lee Monument, which was defaced with spray paint and covered with phrases that not only invoked social justice (such as “Black Lives Matter”) but included profanities that called for violence against the police. In June 2020, a local broadcaster published a picture that would go viral nationally of two young black females dancing or posing on the vandalized Lee Monument in a celebratory manner. The picture was thereafter posted on the Henrico County Public Schools’ Facebook page, pointing out that one of the females was an HCPS student. While some commenters praised the photo, others were critical of the message it conveyed and HCPS’s decision to post the photo.

Reinmuth, an 18-year veteran of the County Division of Fire, joined those criticizing the decision to post the photo on HCPS’ Facebook page. While off-duty, Reinmuth commented “Disgraceful” and added, “Will they be posing with their new TVs as well?”, an allusion to Reinmuth’s belief that the photograph appeared to be advocating for unlawful activity associated with the riots such as vandalism and looting. When Reinmuth’s superiors learned of his comments on the HCPS Facebook page, he was summoned for interrogation about the comments and then terminated the same day. Although Reinmuth filed a grievance challenging his termination, the decision to fire him because of his comments on the Facebook page was upheld.

In the First Amendment lawsuit ([link removed]) filed on behalf of Reinmuth, Rutherford Institute attorneys argue that Reinmuth had a right as a citizen to express his opinion on the appropriateness of the photo and its posting by a school district given that it related to a matter of significant debate in the community and a matter of public interest and concern. The complaint asserts that Reinmuth’s termination for engaging in speech protected by the First Amendment deprived him of his constitutional rights.

The complaint in Reinmuth v. County of Henrico is available at www.rutherford.org. ([link removed])

The Rutherford Institute ([link removed]) , a nonprofit civil liberties organization, defends individuals whose constitutional rights have been violated and educates the public about threats to their freedoms.

Source: [link removed]
[link removed] Share ([link removed])
[link removed]: https%3A%2F%2Fmailchi.mp%2Frutherford%2Fcancel-culture-strikes-again-firefighter-fired-for-criticizing-defaced-public-monuments Tweet ([link removed]: https%3A%2F%2Fmailchi.mp%2Frutherford%2Fcancel-culture-strikes-again-firefighter-fired-for-criticizing-defaced-public-monuments)
[link removed] Forward ([link removed])
CLICK HERE TO MAKE A TAX-DEDUCTIBLE DONATION ([link removed])

To donate via PayPal, please click below:
[link removed]

============================================================
** Follow us on Facebook ([link removed])
** Follow us on Facebook ([link removed])
** Follow us on Twitter ([link removed])
** Follow us on Twitter ([link removed])
** YouTube ([link removed])
** YouTube ([link removed])
CONTACT INFORMATION
Nisha Whitehead
(434) 978-3888 ext. 604
** [email protected] (mailto:[email protected])

THE RUTHERFORD INSTITUTE
Post Office Box 7482
Charlottesville, VA 22906-7482
Phone: (434) 978-3888
** www.rutherford.org ([link removed])

Copyright © 2021 The Rutherford Institute, All rights reserved.

You are receiving this email because of your interest in the work of The Rutherford Institute. Founded in 1982 by constitutional attorney and author John W. Whitehead, The Rutherford Institute is a civil liberties organization that provides free legal services to people whose constitutional and human rights have been threatened or violated. To discontinue your membership electronically, or if you feel you are receiving this message in error, please follow the link below.

Under the regulations of the United States Internal Revenue Service, The Rutherford Institute is incorporated as a 501(c)(3) tax exempt nonprofit organization. Donations to support The Rutherford Institute’s legal and educational work help to safeguard the constitutional rights of all Americans. Donations are tax-deductible. In compliance with general industry standards of a nonprofit organization, the Institute is audited annually by an independent accounting firm.

** unsubscribe from this list ([link removed])

** update subscription preferences ([link removed])