From The Rutherford Institute <[email protected]>
Subject Rutherford Institute Takes Issue With Drug Laws That Deliver Harsher Prison Sentences to African-Americans by 100–1 Ratio
Date January 15, 2021 8:57 PM
  Links have been removed from this email. Learn more in the FAQ.
  Links have been removed from this email. Learn more in the FAQ.
We must ensure all Americans have a fair shot at justice.

View this email in your browser ([link removed])
[link removed]



** For Immediate Release: January 15, 2021
------------------------------------------------------------


** Rutherford Institute Takes Issue With Drug Laws That Deliver Harsher Prison Sentences to African-Americans by 100–1 Ratio
------------------------------------------------------------

WASHINGTON, D.C. — The Rutherford Institute has asked the U.S. Supreme Court to ensure that individuals subjected to discriminatory drug laws that disproportionately, by a 100-1 ratio, deliver harsher prison sentences to African-Americans ([link removed]) can have their sentences reconsidered in a fairer light. In an amicus brief ([link removed]) filed in conjunction with the American Civil Liberties Union and R Street Institute in Jamell Birt v. United States, Rutherford Institute attorneys have asked the Court to order that the First Step Act of 2018, which sought to redress unfair disparities in how persons convicted of possessing crack and powder cocaine were sentenced, be applied to all offenders retroactively.

“For too long, America has paid lip service to ideas about justice and equality while propping up discriminatory laws that serve to disproportionately punish huge segments of the citizenry based on the color of their skin,” said constitutional attorney John W. Whitehead, president of The Rutherford Institute and author of Battlefield America: The War on the American People ([link removed]) . “If we are to ever move forward and rebuild our shattered communities, we must begin by ensuring all Americans have a fair shot at justice.”
MAKE THE GOVERNMENT PLAY BY THE RULES OF THE CONSTITUTION: SUPPORT THE FIGHT FOR FREEDOM ([link removed])

As part of the federal government’s “war on drugs,” individuals convicted of possessing 50 grams of crack cocaine under the Anti-Drug Abuse Act of 1986 could be sentenced to life imprisonment. One would have to possess 100 times as much powder cocaine to trigger a similarly harsh sentence. Because crack cocaine, a rock-like form of the drug that is smoked, was more prevalent in African-American communities, the sentencing disparity resulted in incarceration rates that had a severely disproportionate impact on African-American communities. Although Congress repudiated this harsh punishment of crack cocaine offenders by increasing the amount of crack cocaine needed to trigger particular sentencing ranges, the Fair Sentencing Act of 2010 did not apply retroactively, leaving thousands of individuals to serve sentences considerably longer than they should have been. Then in 2018, Congress attempted to address the disparity with the First Step Act, which retroactively authorized the resentencing
of defendants convicted prior to 2010.

Despite Congress’ intent to allow a sentencing reduction for crack cocaine offenders, some courts have held that the First Step Act’s resentencing authority does not extend to persons convicted of smaller amounts of crack cocaine. In their amicus ([link removed]) brief to the Supreme Court, The Rutherford Institute and its coalition partners argue that the intent of the First Step Act should be enforced by making all persons convicted under the harsh laws aimed at crack cocaine eligible for resentencing and addressing the racial disparities that resulted from those harsh laws.

The amicus brief filed in Jamell Birt v. United States is available at www.rutherford.org. ([link removed])

The Rutherford Institute ([link removed]) , a nonprofit civil liberties organization, provides legal assistance at no charge to individuals whose constitutional rights have been threatened or violated and educates the public on a wide spectrum of issues affecting their freedoms.

Source: [link removed]
[link removed] Share ([link removed])
[link removed]: https%3A%2F%2Fmailchi.mp%2Frutherford%2Frutherford-institute-takes-issue-with-drug-laws-that-deliver-harsher-prison-sentences-to-african-americans-by-1001-ratio Tweet ([link removed]: https%3A%2F%2Fmailchi.mp%2Frutherford%2Frutherford-institute-takes-issue-with-drug-laws-that-deliver-harsher-prison-sentences-to-african-americans-by-1001-ratio)
[link removed] Forward ([link removed])
CLICK HERE TO MAKE A TAX-DEDUCTIBLE DONATION ([link removed])

To donate via PayPal, please click below:
[link removed]

============================================================
** Follow us on Facebook ([link removed])
** Follow us on Facebook ([link removed])
** Follow us on Twitter ([link removed])
** Follow us on Twitter ([link removed])
** YouTube ([link removed])
** YouTube ([link removed])
CONTACT INFORMATION
Nisha Whitehead
(434) 978-3888 ext. 604
** [email protected] (mailto:[email protected])

THE RUTHERFORD INSTITUTE
Post Office Box 7482
Charlottesville, VA 22906-7482
Phone: (434) 978-3888
** www.rutherford.org ([link removed])

Copyright © 2021 The Rutherford Institute, All rights reserved.

You are receiving this email because of your interest in the work of The Rutherford Institute. Founded in 1982 by constitutional attorney and author John W. Whitehead, The Rutherford Institute is a civil liberties organization that provides free legal services to people whose constitutional and human rights have been threatened or violated. To discontinue your membership electronically, or if you feel you are receiving this message in error, please follow the link below.

Under the regulations of the United States Internal Revenue Service, The Rutherford Institute is incorporated as a 501(c)(3) tax exempt nonprofit organization. Donations to support The Rutherford Institute’s legal and educational work help to safeguard the constitutional rights of all Americans. Donations are tax-deductible. In compliance with general industry standards of a nonprofit organization, the Institute is audited annually by an independent accounting firm.

** unsubscribe from this list ([link removed])

** update subscription preferences ([link removed])
Screenshot of the email generated on import

Message Analysis