There are big problems with the idea that life arose from a random assembly of DNA. Aside from the little problem of generating astronomical amounts of crucial information from, err, random mutations, the resulting DNA doesn’t do anything by itself.

Despite the unique challenges brought on by COVID-19, we believe it is as important as ever to explore today’s most pressing questions relating to science and faith. For this reason, we are excited to announce the 3rd annual Dallas Conference on Science & Faith, and invite you to join us either in person or online via livestream.

George Bernard Shaw’s positive criterion by which to measure and ridicule folly and vice was fatally ambiguous, eclectic, and inconstant. Shaw could deplore scientism, ... but often his clear, confident moral rectitude is just a muddle.

Many in the ID community have noted the irony of scientific materialists resisting intelligent design theory with one hand and using it in their own work with the other hand. They readily use ID theory when it suits their purposes, and nobody in the scientific community complains.

The wait is almost over for Stephen Meyer’s next book building the scientific case for intelligent design. Pre-order to get your copy hot off the press in March 2021 and get some cool bonuses including sneak peeks at exclusive excerpts, access to a private online Q&A with Dr. Meyer and steep discounts to his online course.