From National Association of Scholars <[email protected]>
Subject CounterCurrent: Rebalancing the Campus Immigration Narrative
Date January 12, 2021 6:59 PM
  Links have been removed from this email. Learn more in the FAQ.
  Links have been removed from this email. Learn more in the FAQ.
Why is there one right answer on immigration in higher ed?

[link removed][UNIQID]

CounterCurrent: Rebalancing the Campus Immigration Narrative
Why is there one right answer on immigration in higher ed?

CounterCurrent is the National Association of Scholars’ weekly newsletter, bringing you the biggest issues in academia and our responses to them.
[link removed][UNIQID]
Category: Intellectual Diversity; Reading Time: ~2 minutes
------------------------------------------------------------


** Featured Report - Rebalancing the Narrative: Higher Education, Border Security, and Immigration by George R. La Noue ([link removed][UNIQID])
------------------------------------------------------------

“No human being is illegal. ([link removed][UNIQID]) ”

If you’ve been on a college campus in the last five years, chances are you’ve heard this phrase or some variant of it at least a few times. Those who take issue with the terms “illegal immigrant” or “illegal alien” have instead chosen to use “undocumented immigrant ([link removed][UNIQID]) ,” or even “undocumented American ([link removed][UNIQID]) ,” to describe those who enter and remain in the country illegally. But these shifts in language are not mere semantic nitpicking—they point to a broader movement in American higher education toward a complete and unquestioning affirmation of unrestricted immigration to the United States, lawful or otherwise.

Even the fundamental concept of nationhood is being challenged, namely that of a definable geographical area in which lives a countable number of citizens. More and more we hear arguments for “open borders ([link removed][UNIQID]) ”—that is, no real borders—and “global citizens ([link removed][UNIQID]) ”—that is, no real citizens. Border closures of any kind, including during the COVID-19 pandemic, are labeled as racist and xenophobic ([link removed][UNIQID]) , and anyone who even suggests that immigration restrictions are beneficial will likely attract the same labels. In other words, there’s one right answer on immigration in American higher ed, and if you disagree, fall in line or pay the price.

How did we get here? How did immigration policy become a sacred cow of higher education to be questioned by no one? How might we move toward reasoned debate once again?

In the National Association of Scholars’ newest report, Rebalancing the Narrative: Higher Education, Border Security, and Immigration ([link removed][UNIQID]) , George R. La Noue explores these very questions, discussing the various dimensions of immigration policy in America today and suggesting topics for on-campus debate. La Noue, Research Professor of Public Policy and Political Science at the University of Maryland Baltimore County, gives students and professors the tools to have informed discussions about the benefits and detriments of American immigration policy at a time where robust discourse on the subject is desperately needed. As he writes,

Long-term immigration issues will not go away, no matter which party is in power. Higher education should help America to make these decisions with the necessary information and perspectives by sponsoring forums and debates encompassing the full range of views on these subjects. Higher education does not serve its students or our country well by silencing or avoiding debate on immigration and border control policy.


With a new presidential administration incoming and a flipped senate confirmed, views on immigration policy in our government will likely closely resemble those of the higher education establishment. This means that, especially now, the debate must resume. Immigration policy is an immensely complicated topic, both in theory and in practice, and must be discussed and refined by our best and brightest minds, many of whom are found in the academy. Contrary to what many might claim, there is not one right answer. To act as if there is will continue to stunt on-campus debate and will make for short-sighted policy down the road.

Until next week.

David Acevedo
Communications & Research Associate
National Association of Scholars
Read More ([link removed][UNIQID])
For more on intellectual diversity and cancel culture in higher ed:
[link removed][UNIQID]

December 30, 2020


** What to Worship, How to Obey: The New Rules of Cancel Culture ([link removed][UNIQID])
------------------------------------------------------------

Peter Wood

Cancel culture is what we call the effort by leftists to banish people who defy the edicts of political correctness. The goalposts keep moving and cancellable offenses continue to expand. Are there any rules boundaries to cancel culture?

[link removed][UNIQID]

December 09, 2020


** Why I Left the AHA and Joined the NAS ([link removed][UNIQID])
------------------------------------------------------------

Johanna Neuman

A long-time journalist-turned historian explains why she left the American Historical Association to join the National Association of Scholars, citing the AHA's cowardice amid the events of 2020.

[link removed][UNIQID]

August 07, 2020


** The End of Meritocracy ([link removed][UNIQID])
------------------------------------------------------------

David Acevedo

UT Austin has asserted its commitment to faculty merit and ideological diversity amid backlash over its proposed “Faculty Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion, Strategic Plan.”

[link removed][UNIQID]

April 18, 2020


** Critical Care ([link removed][UNIQID])
------------------------------------------------------------

National Association of Scholars

American higher education has undergone an unprecedented financial crisis. Critical Care is a plan to guide the federal response to these unprecedented disruptions facing higher education in the midst of the pandemic.


** About the NAS
------------------------------------------------------------
The National Association of Scholars, founded in 1987, emboldens reasoned scholarship and propels civil debate. We’re the leading organization of scholars and citizens committed to higher education as the catalyst of American freedom.

============================================================
Follow NAS on social media.
** Facebook ([link removed][UNIQID])
** Twitter ([link removed][UNIQID])
** YouTube ([link removed][UNIQID])
** Website ([link removed][UNIQID])
** Donate ([link removed][UNIQID])
| ** Join ([link removed][UNIQID])
| ** Renew ([link removed][UNIQID])
| ** Bookstore ([link removed][UNIQID])
Copyright © 2021 National Association of Scholars, All rights reserved.
You are receiving this email because you opted in via our website, membership or donation forms, contact forms at events, or by signing open letters.

Our mailing address is:
National Association of Scholars
420 Madison Avenue
7th Floor
New York, NY 10017-2418
USA
Want to change how you receive these emails?
You can ** update your preferences ([link removed])
or ** unsubscribe from this list ([link removed])
.
Screenshot of the email generated on import

Message Analysis