From Leah and Ezra, Indivisible <[email protected]>
Subject Update on impeachment
Date September 25, 2019 4:21 PM
  Links have been removed from this email. Learn more in the FAQ.
  Links have been removed from this email. Learn more in the FAQ.
Indivisibles,

Leah and I wanted to give you an update on yesterday’s events and provide
a little context around Indivisible's role in moving the Speaker of the
House to endorse Impeachment proceedings against the President. Our team
will be sending around action items and next steps later today, but we
didn’t want to let the moment pass us by without taking a step back to see
how we got here.

The long road to impeachment. A little more than 2 years and 4 months ago
-- after James Comey was fired -- Indivisible came out in favor of
impeachment proceedings. We were one of the first national organizations
to call for impeachment proceedings, but we were confident in the decision
because we knew that was where Indivisibles were, and it’s what we
believed was necessary to safeguard American democracy. Over the last 2+
years, Indivisible has had countless national days of action, call-ins,
and national coordinating table meetings to press various aspects of the
case for impeachment.

After Mueller’s appointment and for much of 2018, the pressure for
impeachment largely relented, as we focused efforts instead on building
the Blue Wave to retake some amount of power. After taking back the House,
the impeachment conversation reignited, but House Leadership cautioned
patience as we waited for Mueller's report. We waited. With Mueller's
report finally released in the spring of this year, we mobilized yet
again. While some House Democrats started coming out for impeachment,
Democratic Leadership was slow to react. 

While Pelosi [ [link removed] ]was reportedly actively blocking the Judiciary Committee
from moving forward on impeachment (over the objection of Chairman
Nadler), we set up [ [link removed] ]impeach.indivisible.org to ramp up in-district
pressure and build the number of pro-impeachment members. Members started
coming out slowly but surely -- including some front-line members like
Katie Porter and Tom Malinowski (among others that local Indivisible
groups had helped elect). Presidential candidates Warren and Castro led
with calls for impeachment, but others cautiously held back.

It wasn't enough. Nothing was really changing in Washington. The Mueller
Report, practically a directive to Congress to begin impeachment
proceedings, sat on the shelf. Members of Congress weren't reading it or
digesting it. They weren't being forced to. And House Leadership continued
to try to change the conversation, squaring the difference with a muddled
compromise on impeachment proceedings. Right before August recess,
Chairman Nadler and progressive partners like Pramila Jayapal announced
that the Judiciary Committee was indeed moving forward with impeachment
proceedings. 

The Judiciary announcement was a victory, but a partial victory. Judiciary
Committee was allowed to move forward with impeachment work, but
conservative Democrats and Leadership [ [link removed] ]muddied the message and insisted
that impeachment wasn't actually happening. It was almost like they were
trying to relieve pressure from the grassroots, while not actually
committing to do anything substantive. 

So Indivisible launched [ [link removed] ]Impeachment August with a group of other
progressive organizations to increase pressure on members with a couple
hundred local events over the congressional recess. Our goal was to get a
majority of the House caucus on board. We surpassed that goal.

Then, last week, the Ukraine story broke, and Trump admitted on national
TV to threatening a foreign leader in order to undermine a political
opponent -- and the release of the transcript this morning backs up what
he already admitted. But yet again, House Leadership's comments seemed
designed to [ [link removed] ]tamp down any sort of hope around impeachment. 

On Monday, as the story developed, we pulled together with our national
partners to plan a response. Yesterday, we got on the phone with MoveOn,
PCCC, By the People and others, as well as our friends on Capitol Hill. It
was clear the ground was moving quickly, but there was danger House
Leadership would create a special committee to take authority away from
Judiciary Committee and delay the process further. They needed pressure on
Congress. 

Pressure on congress is where we do our best work. So after the call, we
mobilized, sending text messages and emails (like this one) and posting on
social, asking you to take action, fast.

In just 4 hours, we drove over 11,000 calls to congress just through
Indivisible's call tool alone (not counting the Indivisible members who
have their members on speed dial...which is to say most). And it worked: 
In the early evening, Pelosi announced she was moving forward with formal
impeachment proceedings -- and she is not circumventing the Judiciary
Committee. 

The fight is not over. We don't know how quickly this process will move
forward, and the House is set to go into recess for 2 weeks at the end of
this week. We are calling on Pelosi to cancel recess, and if we lose that
fight, we will be mobilizing in-district events telling members to go back
to work and get the job done. We are joining MoveOn in a Thursday D.C.
action in front of the White House, and half a dozen national groups (as
of this morning) are cosponsoring our in-district events around the
country next week.

Big national victories can be surprisingly tricky to identify, and so they
often go uncelebrated. These victories are almost always partial and
uncertain. When we mounted statewide die-ins at Schumer's offices in June
2017 to encourage him to withhold consent to delay the TrumpCare bill into
July recess and buy us more time, he ultimately relented - and then
claimed he planned to do it all along. When we won the Senate vote against
TrumpCare in July, we were worried for months that it would come back.
When we took the House in 2018, the night felt disjointed and incomplete
with losses in Florida, Georgia, and Texas.

This victory too is incomplete and uncertain. We don't know if all of our
efforts would have led to this point had the Ukraine news not broken. We
also don't know whether this will lead to impeachment as we envision it,
or if it's just the latest development in a slow-walk strategy that will
ultimately disappoint us. 

But without grassroots pressure, pressure from you and Indivisibles
nationwide, the dam would not have broken the way it did. Reporting from a
few different sources points to the role of persistent grassroots pressure
in shifting Democrats over to our side. [ [link removed] ]This Ryan Grim piece is
particularly good, and [ [link removed] ]he's not alone in his take. A frontline Dem
staffer told Gro, they came out for impeachment early in the summer and
that "doing so had minimized the pain that so many others felt over
recess." Another was blunter: “We spent all summer getting the shit kicked
out of us back home.”

Power concedes nothing without a demand. And we're in the business of
building local groups to confront power. So we’re celebrating - partial
and uncertain as this victory may be - because power conceded something
last night that we’ve been demanding for a very long time.

In solidarity,

Ezra & Leah

Co-Executive Directors, Indivisible



On of the ways we’ve been able to keep this up for 2.5 years, is the
grassroots donations from literally every state in the country. That’s
why we’re asking you to donate to support our movement:

[ [link removed] ]If you’d like to make a $46 donation (or any amount!) to Indivisible
Action in honor of the 46th President of the United States, you can do
that here.

And regardless, please show up with your local Indivisible group at
in-district actions next week! We’ll follow up soon with details. #46
can’t come soon enough.



[ [link removed] ][IMG]

[ [link removed] ][IMG]

[ [link removed] ][IMG]



You can unsubscribe from this mailing list at any time:
[link removed]
Screenshot of the email generated on import

Message Analysis

  • Sender: Indivisible
  • Political Party: n/a
  • Country: United States
  • State/Locality: n/a
  • Office: n/a
  • Email Providers:
    • ActionKit