From Counter Extremism Project <[email protected]>
Subject ISIS Redux: The Central Syria Insurgency In December 2020
Date January 5, 2021 7:00 PM
  Links have been removed from this email. Learn more in the FAQ.
  Links have been removed from this email. Learn more in the FAQ.
CEP Research Analyst Gregory Waters On The ISIS Insurgency In Central Syria


<[link removed]>
<[link removed]>
ISIS Redux: The Central Syria Insurgency In December 2020

CEP Research Analyst Gregory Waters On The ISIS Insurgency In Central Syria

Read ISIS Redux: The Central Syria Insurgency In December 2020 by clicking here

<[link removed]>
.

 

ISIS Redux: The Central Syria Insurgency In December 2020

By Gregory Waters

 

Following is the December installment of “ISIS Redux: The Central Syria
Insurgency,” a monthly chronicle of attacks by the terrorist group ISIS in
central Syria. Previous editions of ISIS Redux can be viewed through the
following links:November
<[link removed]>
,October
<[link removed]>
,September
<[link removed]>
,August
<[link removed]>
,July
<[link removed]>
,June
<[link removed]>
,May
<[link removed]>
, andApril
<[link removed]>. A
full background and analysis of ISIS’s resurgence in Syria, including its
methodology, can be exploredhere
<[link removed]>
andhere
<[link removed]>
.

 

ISIS militants carried out at least 33 confirmed attacks in December, killing
at least 56 pro-Assad regime fighters and wounding at least 57 in the Homs,
Deir Ez Zor, Raqqa, Hama, and Aleppo governorates. While there was a slight
increase in the overall number of attacks compared to November, December saw a
significant drop in high quality* attacks, ending a four-month streak of
double-digit high quality attacks. 





November concluded with the Assad regime carrying out widespread anti-ISIS
operations in northeast Hama, a reaction to the consistent high quality attacks
in the area that month. These operations appeared to have little or no effect
on the group, as attacks continued in the province at an even greater pace in
December. Indeed, December was the first month in which more attacks occurred
in Hama (10) than in any other governorate. Attacks in Homs (5) dropped
sharply, but remained focused on both Palmyra (2) and Sukhnah (2). Meanwhile
both Raqqa (8) and Deir Ez Zor (8) saw increases in ISIS activity, reversing a
downward trend that began in October, with nearly half of the attacks in the
latter province being high quality.




Last month, we noted that attack patterns appeared to show a connection
between the ISIS cells operating in northeast Hama and Raqqa, particularly its
southwest region. Despite an increase in both Raqqa and Hama attacks in
December, this geographic pattern remained consistent as the increased attacks
in Raqqa occurred almost exclusively in the southeast section of the province.
Thus, it seems we can roughly define two groups of cells in the area, one
operating in southeast Raqqa (and likely northeast Homs), and the other group
operating from southwest Raqqa to northeast Hama.



Map of ISIS attacks in northeast Hama, Aleppo, northeast Homs, and Raqqa in
December (highlighted dots).

 

ISIS carried out seven high quality attacks in December, the fewest since
July. The lack of important attacks during the first half of the month was
likely due to ongoing regime sweeps in Hama, Raqqa, and Deir Ez Zor. However,
on December 12 an Improvised Explosive Device (IED) killed seven soldiers on
the highway outside Maadan, Raqqa. It was the deadliest attack of the year in
southeast Raqqa. Two days later, fighting erupted outside Rahjan, northeast
Hama. ISIS claims the clashes were triggered when its fighters repelled a
regime patrol that entered an ISIS-held village in the area. Fighting then
raged across the area for two more days, with at least 28 soldiers wounded by
the end. There is no evidence that ISIS lost any fighters in the battle. At the
end of the third day, pro-regime forces declared a string of hamlets east of
Rahjan “secured.” This was the second multi-day battle around Rahjan in as many
months.

 

On December 27, ISIS killed a Republican Guard colonel near Boukamal, Deir Ez
Zor. The colonel was the 24th commander killed in the Badia (Syrian desert)
this year. His death marks the 11th month in a row that ISIS militants have
successfully killed a pro-regime officer. Three days later, ISIS used IEDs and
heavy machine guns to ambush three buses carrying members of the 4th Division’s
Security Office along the Deir Ez Zor-Palmyra highway. The militants completely
destroyed one bus, killing at least 30 soldiers and wounding 17. The attack
occurred in the middle of the night, and ISIS reportedly waited nearby for the
arrival of regime reinforcements before launching a second attack, which
resulted in additional casualties.

 

This final major attack of 2020 came just one week after ISIS launched similar
attacks on vehicles in the same part of the highway. Just two days earlier, on
December 28, the commanders of the Deir Ez Zor National Defense Forces (NDF),
the 104th Republican Guard Brigade, and the Syrian Arab Army’s (SAA) 17th
Division had toured this area in a show of force. While this media tour
ultimately changed nothing on the ground, it did reveal an important
development in the SAA-NDF relationship in the governorate.

 

In November, the SAA-NDF power struggle
<[link removed]>
came to a head when ISIS killed 17th Division regiment commander, likely
operating on intelligence passed to the group by the local NDF commander.
However, in early December, the 17th Division’s Chief of Staff was promoted to
commander, and he quickly initiated a serious of meetings with the long spurned
local tribal leaders and heads of other regime security forces. The December 28
battlefield tour was the first time in more than a year that both the head of
the Deir Ez Zor NDF and the head of Deir Ez Zor’s most important SAA unit, the
17th Division, were pictured together outside of a ceremony.

 

The continued rebuilding of this relationship, and the broader work unifying
the disparate pro-regime military units in the governorate, remains crucial for
any attempts to reverse ISIS gains here. While the joint NDF-SAA sweeps
conducted after the December 30 attack are a positive development, such tactics
remain ineffective at rooting out ISIS cells. As long as the regime is unable
to find a more effective counter-insurgency strategy, ISIS will continue to
move about freely, harassing patrols and conducting high quality attacks
wherever it finds vulnerabilities—of which there are many.

 

January will surely see continued pressure in east Hama, as ISIS appears to
have demonstrated that no level of regime presence in the region will prevent
it from carrying out attacks. The boldness of the late December attacks along
the Deir Ez Zor-Palmyra highway may indicate that ISIS is renewing an old
strategy of pressuring key transit lines. If this is the case, we can also
expect to see attacks in January occur along the M20 and the Salamiyah-Resafa
highway. The trend of the past five months suggests there will be about 30
attacks in January, with the number of high quality attacks contingent on the
extent of the regime’s commitment to launching widespread and sustained sweeps.



Map of locatable ISIS attacks (highlighted dots) in December. To view an
interactive version of this map, please clickhere
<[link removed]>
.

 

---

 

*High quality attacks are defined as attacks behind frontlines, those that
result in seized positions, target regime officers, involve coordinated attacks
on multiple positions, fake checkpoints, ambushes on military convoys, or
attacks on checkpoints that kill at least three soldiers or lead to POWs.


###



Unsubscribe
<[link removed]>
Screenshot of the email generated on import

Message Analysis

  • Sender: Counter Extremism Project
  • Political Party: n/a
  • Country: n/a
  • State/Locality: n/a
  • Office: n/a
  • Email Providers:
    • Iterable