From xxxxxx <[email protected]>
Subject Nuclear Weapons Are Out of Control. But Biden Can Make the World Safer.
Date January 2, 2021 3:45 AM
  Links have been removed from this email. Learn more in the FAQ.
  Links have been removed from this email. Learn more in the FAQ.
[Six ways that Biden can make the world safer in 2021.]
[[link removed]]

NUCLEAR WEAPONS ARE OUT OF CONTROL. BUT BIDEN CAN MAKE THE WORLD
SAFER.  
[[link removed]]


 

Joseph Cirincione
January 17, 2021
The American Prospect
[[link removed]]


*
[[link removed].]
*
[[link removed]]
*
* [[link removed]]

_ Six ways that Biden can make the world safer in 2021. _

The Red Safe held the launch codes and keys, Steven Miller

 

Donald Trump left Joe Biden with a hot nuclear mess. Trump made every
nuclear danger he inherited worse by the hawkish policies he and
Republicans pursued.

Iran is accelerating its civilian nuclear program. North Korea is
expanding its nuclear military capabilities. They are not alone. Every
one of the nine nuclear-armed states is building new weapons. Yet
Trump destroyed or abandoned crucial security agreements restraining
these dangers and started or accelerated a half-dozen new weapons for
missions we don’t need with budgets we can’t afford.

Fortunately, there’s a great deal that Joe Biden can do, on his own,
in the first few days and weeks of his presidency.

He can quickly establish his authority over a nuclear weapons complex
spiraling out of control. He can reduce the risk of nuclear war by
accident, miscalculation, or madness; stop a new nuclear arms race;
shave hundreds of billions of dollars off the military budget; and
prevent new states from getting these weapons. By so doing, he can
make America and the world more secure.

REFORM COMMAND AND CONTROL. Nuclear weapons are often called “the
president’s weapons.” The commander in chief sets the policy,
requirements, and size of the U.S. arsenal. He has
[[link removed]] sole,
unfettered authority to launch one or all of the nation’s almost
4,000 operational nuclear weapons
[[link removed]].
He need not consult with anyone; no one can counter his command.

Since Trump did not press the button during his four years in the Oval
Office, some may think that concerns about a madman destroying all of
humanity are overstated. In truth, we dodged
[[link removed]] a
nuclear bullet. As president, Biden should do all he can to ensure we
never again come so close to self-annihilation.

Biden does not need the permission of Congress to announce early in
his tenure that procedures adopted by past presidents in the fearful
days of the Cold War—including the first use of nuclear weapons in a
conventional conflict, missiles ready to launch in minutes, and the
sole authority of the president to fire these weapons—combine now to
present an unacceptable risk of nuclear disaster.

He can direct that U.S. policy is to never start a nuclear war, that
we no longer need to keep our weapons on hair-trigger alert, and that
henceforth the president will need the concurrence of another senior
official, such as the Speaker of the House, to launch nuclear weapons.

SAVE ARMS CONTROL. Biden can take an immediate step to curtail the
arms race by quickly agreeing
[[link removed]] with
Russia to extend the New START treaty for five years, due to expire in
February 2021. It is the only remaining limitation on U.S. and Russian
arsenals, after four years of Trump’s withdrawal from key strategic
accords. This will provide the basis for returning to the process
of principled dialogue
[[link removed]] with
Russia and other nuclear-armed states, including China, to freeze and
reduce global arsenals.

Your donation keeps this site free and open for all to read. Give what
you can...

SUPPORT THE PROSPECT
[[link removed]]

Biden could re-sign the Open Skies Treaty
[[link removed]] that
Trump jettisoned and stop efforts to dismantle
[[link removed]] the airplanes used to
implement this security pact. He can state his hopes of working with
those nations supporting the new Treaty on the Prohibition of Nuclear
Weapons
[[link removed]] entering
into force two days after his inauguration, forging a united front
against nuclear dangers. As a Catholic, he can speak powerfully to the
immorality of nuclear weapons, eloquently voiced
[[link removed]] by Pope
Francis and shared
[[link removed]] by
religious leaders around the world.

STOP THE ARMS RACE. Concurrently, Biden can also cancel or suspend
development, production, and deployment of the host of new nuclear
weapons [[link removed]] begun or accelerated by
Trump. These range from the very small to the hugely expensive, but
all are unnecessary overkill.

This would put into action the pledge
[[link removed]] in
the Democratic Party platform “to maintain a strong, credible
deterrent while reducing our overreliance and excessive expenditure on
nuclear weapons. The Trump Administration’s proposal to build new
nuclear weapons is unnecessary, wasteful, and indefensible.”

Specifically, Biden can reverse Trump’s production and deployment of
a new submarine-launched ballistic missile warhead (the W76-2),
designed to make starting a nuclear war easier by reducing the yield
of the bomb. He could cancel Trump’s plans to build a new, unneeded
sea-launched nuclear cruise missile, halt the new air-launched
nuclear-armed cruise missile, and suspend programs to build a herd of
new nuclear warheads and to ramp up production of the plutonium cores
of these bombs.

Biden can quickly establish his authority over a nuclear weapons
complex spiraling out of control.

Most importantly, Biden should cancel
[[link removed]] the
contract to build a new intercontinental ballistic missile (ICBM) that
Trump rushed
[[link removed]] though
in his final months in office. With a current (and certain to rise)
cost estimate
[[link removed]] of
$264 billion, this is the most dangerous, destabilizing, and unneeded
leg of the nuclear triad.

Designed for waging global thermonuclear war during the U.S.-Soviet
rivalry, ICBMs are obsolete. U.S. ballistic missile
submarines provide
[[link removed]] massive
destructive power from their secure, undetectable patrols beneath the
world’s oceans, and strategic bombers provide greater flexibility.

CONTROL THE BUDGET. All contribute to a nuclear budget the Trump
administration inflated from the last Obama-Biden budget of $28
billion
[[link removed]] in
fiscal year 2017 to $44.5 billion
[[link removed]] in
fiscal 2021—part of the $500 billion the Pentagon plans to spend
[[link removed]] on
these weapons in this decade and $2 trillion over 25 years.

For greater savings, Biden could also delay costly and unproven
missile interceptor weapons. “Missile defense and defeat” programs
skyrocketed to an additional $20 billion this year, compared to the $3
billion annual budgets
[[link removed]] of
the Ronald Reagan years. Biden should abolish the Missile Defense
Agency—an in-house lobbying shop for these programs which has proven
unable to produce effective weapons—and devolve the programs back to
the military services from whence they came.

When the services no longer get free money but must pay for these
programs out of their own budgets, they will be incentivized to
restore discipline and prioritization to the procurement process.
Biden should also insist that any weapon pass rigorous operational
tests
[[link removed]] before
deployment, something no long-range missile defense system has ever
done.

Your donation keeps this site free and open for all to read. Give what
you can...

SUPPORT THE PROSPECT
[[link removed]]

These moves will generate strong resistance from the nuclear weapons
contractors and from members of Congress whose districts and
states benefit
[[link removed]] from
the profits and jobs associated with their production and basing.
Analysts at think tanks
[[link removed]] getting
contractor and Pentagon grants will howl.

Biden must not blink. By acting swiftly to cancel or suspend these
programs, and to cut
[[link removed]] the
overall Pentagon budget accordingly, Biden will create considerable
leverage for negotiations with Congress. He will arrive at a much
better deal by starting at zero and negotiating up rather than by
trimming the programs and negotiating down—or worse, leaving
Trump’s inflated Pentagon budget intact.

After these initial steps, Biden could announce a major nuclear
policy review
[[link removed]] by the
National Security Council. He should not punt this issue to the
Pentagon by ordering yet another contractor-friendly nuclear posture
review
[[link removed]].
Rather, with the White House controlling the process, Biden can ensure
that diplomacy and domestic needs are given equal weight to lucrative
contracts. He should review and finally implement the 2012 Joint
Chiefs of Staff study that concluded the United States could cut
[[link removed]] our
arsenal by one-third and still fulfill all nuclear missions, no matter
what the Russians did.

In this way, he might produce a “nuclear policy for the middle
class.” This would fit in nicely with his stated desire
[[link removed]] to
ensure that our foreign policy increases America’s economic
security. Shifting hundreds of billions of dollars from nuclear
weapons to climate change, health care, and infrastructure can give
him resources for the bold reimagining of America’s
national-security strategy he wishes
[[link removed]] to
chart.

If Biden wants to transform policy, he must appoint transformers.

STOP THE SPREAD. Stopping new nuclear weapons programs in other
nations requires tough negotiations, but here, too, Biden can do a
great deal on his own. He has pledged to bring the United States back
into compliance with the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action
(JCPOA)—the strongest nonproliferation agreement ever
negotiated—as long as Iran also returns to compliance.

He will have to do so early in 2021, before June presidential
elections in Iran freeze the ability of the current Iranian officials
to compromise and likely bring a hard-line president to power. To get
Iran back into full compliance, Biden will have to do the same, fully
lifting the sanctions
[[link removed]] Trump
decreed in violation of the pact. U.S. allies opposed Trump’s
leaving the accord and will welcome
[[link removed]] America’s
return.

This return, rather than continuing punishing sanctions, will give
Biden leverage to build on the JCPOA to negotiate further restraints
on Iran and to rebalance America’s relations in the Middle East.

North Korea is not as straightforward, but history shows that North
Korea will not be ignored. If Biden does not engage Kim Jong Un, he
gives Kim the ability to upset his agenda with missile launches,
nuclear tests, and other incitements. “Rather than passively
awaiting a provocation as a _fait accompli_, U.S. and South Korean
policymakers should work together proactively to preempt this
scenario,” advise
[[link removed]] veteran
Korea experts Frank Aum and George Lopez. Other experts, such as
former Los Alamos Director Sig Hecker, have detailed a step-by-step
process
[[link removed]] that
can freeze and begin to roll back the North’s weapons capabilities,
opening up the possibility of eventual dismantlement.

PERSONNEL IS POLICY. Finally, Obama’s ambitious nuclear agenda
was blocked
[[link removed]] in
part by the resistance of the nuclear bureaucracy, including some of
his own appointees. If Biden wants to transform policy, he must
appoint transformers.

Former Deputy National Security Advisor Ben Rhodes told
[[link removed]] me
that a key lesson from the Obama effort was that you “need to embed
that agenda in the government” with people trusted to “doggedly
implement the agenda.” Biden can weed out Trump moles trying to
burrow in, replacing them with experts who will push the policy
envelope.

The mental instability of Donald Trump exposed
[[link removed]] the
insanity of a system that allows one human being to destroy in minutes
all that humanity has constructed over millennia. With presidential
directives and a loyal staff, Biden can finally break the grip of Cold
War thinking. He can put in place new procedures, new budgets, and a
new vision to make us all safer. The world will thank him.

_JOSEPH CIRINCIONE is a distinguished fellow at the Quincy Institute
and a national-security analyst and author with over 35 years of
experience in Washington, D.C._

*
[[link removed].]
*
[[link removed]]
*
* [[link removed]]

 

 

 

INTERPRET THE WORLD AND CHANGE IT

 

 

Submit via web [[link removed]]
Submit via email
Frequently asked questions [[link removed]]
Manage subscription [[link removed]]
Visit xxxxxx.org [[link removed]]

Twitter [[link removed]]

Facebook [[link removed]]

 




[link removed]

To unsubscribe, click the following link:
[link removed]
Screenshot of the email generated on import

Message Analysis

  • Sender: Portside
  • Political Party: n/a
  • Country: United States
  • State/Locality: n/a
  • Office: n/a
  • Email Providers:
    • L-Soft LISTSERV