This flies in the face of everything the Fourth Amendment is supposed to protect

View this email in your browser ([link removed])
[link removed]



** For Immediate Release: December 30, 2020
------------------------------------------------------------


** Undermining the Fourth: Police—in ‘Hot Pursuit’ Over Driver’s Loud Music—Follow Car, Carry Out Warrantless Home Invasion
------------------------------------------------------------

WASHINGTON, D.C. — Pushing back against efforts to dismantle the constitutional right to be secure in one’s home from unreasonable searches and seizures by government agents, The Rutherford Institute is challenging an attempt by police to justify carrying out a warrantless home invasion ([link removed]) of a man who honked his horn several times and had his music turned up while driving.

In an amicus brief filed in Lange v. State of California ([link removed]) , Rutherford Institute attorneys have asked the U.S. Supreme Court to ensure that police do not use the “hot pursuit” exception to the warrant requirement as a means of sidestepping the Fourth Amendment. Institute attorneys have also asked the Court to overturn the lower court’s ruling that police, engaged in “hot pursuit” of a suspect over of a dubious traffic infraction, were justified in following the driver into his garage and questioning him without a warrant.

“Police have been given free rein to pull anyone over for a variety of dubious reasons, resulting in drivers being stopped for windows that are too heavily tinted, for driving too fast, driving too slow, failing to maintain speed, improper lane changes, distracted driving, screeching a car’s tires, and leaving a parked car door open for too long,” said constitutional attorney John W. Whitehead, president of The Rutherford Institute and author of Battlefield America: The War on the American People ([link removed]) . “To allow police to pursue drivers and carry out warrantless invasions of their homes merely for daring to play their car music too loudly or honking their horns flies in the face of everything the Fourth Amendment is supposed to protect.”
24 HOURS LEFT TO DOUBLE THE IMPACT OF YOUR 2020 TAX-DEDUCTIBLE, YEAR-END DONATION ([link removed])

Driving back to his home in a neighborhood in Sonoma, Calif., on an evening in October 2016, Arthur Lange had the music in his vehicle turned up loud ([link removed]) and his windows open. He also honked his horn several times as he was driving. Taking notice of the sounds coming from Lange’s vehicle and believing these might constitute minor misdemeanor infractions punishable only by small fines, a highway patrol officer followed him all the way home. Not until Lange had pulled into his driveway and parked his car in the garage did the officer activate his overhead lights to signify that he wanted Lange to pull over. The officer pulled into the driveway after Lange had parked his car and the garage door began closing. The officer then exited his vehicle, approached the closing garage, thrust his foot under the door, causing it to
reopen, and entered the garage unannounced and uninvited. He proceeded to question Lange. After Lange produce his license and registration and answered more questions, the officer stated that he smelled alcohol on Lange and demanded he submit to sobriety testing. Lange was arrested and charged with driving while intoxicated.

In court, Lange argued that the officer’s warrantless entry into his garage violated the Fourth Amendment. The California courts rejected Lange’s claim, ruling that the entry into the residence was allowed under the “hot pursuit” exception to the warrant requirement. On appeal to the U.S. Supreme Court, Rutherford Institute attorneys argue ([link removed]) that the sanctity of the home must prevail over any interest police might have in engaging in “hot pursuit” of citizens suspected of committing nonviolent misdemeanors.

The amicus brief ([link removed]) in Lange v. State of California is available at www.rutherford.org ([link removed]) . Affiliate attorneys Michael Kimberly, Ethan Townsend, and Brett Meyerhoff of McDermott, Will & Emery LLP in Washington, D.C. assisted The Rutherford Institute in advancing the arguments in Lange.

The Rutherford Institute ([link removed]) , a nonprofit civil liberties organization, provides legal assistance at no charge to individuals whose constitutional rights have been threatened or violated and educates the public on a wide spectrum of issues affecting their freedoms.

Source: [link removed]
[link removed] Share ([link removed])
[link removed]: https%3A%2F%2Fmailchi.mp%2Frutherford%2Fpolicein-hot-pursuit-over-drivers-loud-musicfollow-car-carry-out-warrantless-home-invasion Tweet ([link removed]: https%3A%2F%2Fmailchi.mp%2Frutherford%2Fpolicein-hot-pursuit-over-drivers-loud-musicfollow-car-carry-out-warrantless-home-invasion)
[link removed] Forward ([link removed])
YEAR-END MATCHING GIFT DEADLINE EXPIRES 12/31 ([link removed])

To donate via PayPal, please click below:
[link removed]

============================================================
** Follow us on Facebook ([link removed])
** Follow us on Facebook ([link removed])
** Follow us on Twitter ([link removed])
** Follow us on Twitter ([link removed])
** YouTube ([link removed])
** YouTube ([link removed])
CONTACT INFORMATION
Nisha Whitehead
(434) 978-3888 ext. 604
** [email protected] (mailto:[email protected])

THE RUTHERFORD INSTITUTE
Post Office Box 7482
Charlottesville, VA 22906-7482
Phone: (434) 978-3888
** www.rutherford.org ([link removed])

Copyright © 2020 The Rutherford Institute, All rights reserved.

You are receiving this email because of your interest in the work of The Rutherford Institute. Founded in 1982 by constitutional attorney and author John W. Whitehead, The Rutherford Institute is a civil liberties organization that provides free legal services to people whose constitutional and human rights have been threatened or violated. To discontinue your membership electronically, or if you feel you are receiving this message in error, please follow the link below.

Under the regulations of the United States Internal Revenue Service, The Rutherford Institute is incorporated as a 501(c)(3) tax exempt nonprofit organization. Donations to support The Rutherford Institute’s legal and educational work help to safeguard the constitutional rights of all Americans. Donations are tax-deductible. In compliance with general industry standards of a nonprofit organization, the Institute is audited annually by an independent accounting firm.

** unsubscribe from this list ([link removed])

** update subscription preferences ([link removed])