From Downsize DC <[email protected]>
Subject Could a defense bill destroy internet free speech?
Date December 23, 2020 6:03 PM
  Links have been removed from this email. Learn more in the FAQ.
  Links have been removed from this email. Learn more in the FAQ.
Politicians threatened to try it

View this email in your browser ([link removed])
Would you let the politicians destroy internet free speech by clustering unrelated bills?

Section 230 ([link removed]) of federal communications law protects free expression on the internet, while also allowing people to moderate their own sites as they see fit. In other words...

Section 230 simply affirms the First and Ninth Amendments.

So there should be no controversy right? Well...

There are plenty of special interests who also want to regulate the internet so as to strangle competitors ([link removed]) or to silence the speech of groups they dislike.

Politicians don't care much about freedom. They seem to enjoy being involved in absolutely everything.

Fortunately, free expression is popular with most people. Politicians must tread carefully when it comes to regulating the internet. Which is why...

Sen. Roger Wicker, a Republican from Mississippi who is the chair of the Senate Commerce Committee, needed to be sneaky. He wanted to repeal Section 230 ([link removed]) . And Trump was willing to cooperate, on his way out the door. But both men knew they couldn't do it with a direct assault. That's why...

The Republicans threatened to add-in their Section 230 repeal to a defense spending bill that was sure to pass.

This kind of clustering is exactly what our One Subject at a Time Act (OSTA) ([link removed]) is designed to prevent.

Maybe you even want to see a repeal of Section 230. But if representation means anything, such a repeal proposal should stand or fall on its own merits, instead of being clustered into an unrelated bill just because it's sure to pass.

Alas, there are plenty of newspaper industry lobbyists working against Section 230, but no citizen-based lobbyists working to protect it. Our strategies of The 300 ([link removed]) and Option Activism ([link removed]) are designed to impact this imbalance. Please participate!
End bill clustering via OSTA ([link removed])

Also, Downsize DC runs on a lean budget. It's made possible, primarily, by modest monthly pledges. We seek one-time contributions. But our 2021 plans require new pledgers right now. We provide several options by which you can contribute or start a monthly pledge ([link removed]) .

More soon!

Jim Babka, President
Agenda Setters by Downsize DC
Today's Action: Use OSTA to save free expression on the internet ([link removed])

============================================================
Every issue of this newsletter is also reproduced on our blog the same day - sometimes with a modified title for Search Engine Optimization purposes. That blog post is also put on the Downsize DC Facebook page. The Facebook algorithm will show the post to more people if you leave a reaction (Like) or a comment. Even more will see it, if you Share it.
** Twitter ([link removed])
** Facebook ([link removed])
** Website ([link removed])
Copyright © 2020 DownsizeDC.org, All rights reserved.
You are receiving this email because you opted in at our website

Our mailing address is:
DownsizeDC.org
872 Mark Drive
Akron, OH 44313
USA
Want to change how you receive these emails?
You can ** update your preferences ([link removed])
or ** unsubscribe from this list ([link removed])
.
Email Marketing Powered by Mailchimp
[link removed]
Screenshot of the email generated on import

Message Analysis

  • Sender: Downsize DC
  • Political Party: n/a
  • Country: United States
  • State/Locality: n/a
  • Office: n/a
  • Email Providers:
    • MailChimp