From Cato Today <[email protected]>
Subject Remove Barriers to Interstate Telemedicine
Date December 17, 2020 12:02 PM
  Links have been removed from this email. Learn more in the FAQ.
  Links have been removed from this email. Learn more in the FAQ.
Restrictions to interstate telemedicine should be permanently removed. Another section 230 reform bill threatens freedom of speech.

View in browser ([link removed] )

December 17, 2020

online-free-speech ([link removed] )

Section 230 Reform Bill Raises First Amendment Concerns ([link removed] )

Legislation that would push radical, popularly disfavored, or simply illegible speech out of the public eye via private proxies raises unavoidable First Amendment concerns.

- Another Section 230 Reform Bill: Dangerous Algorithms Bill Threatens Speech ([link removed] )

By Will Duffield

Medical Bill Costs ([link removed] )

Restrictions to Interstate Telemedicine Should Be Permanently Waived ([link removed] )

Interstate telemedicine—in which physicians serve patients in other states—can facilitate access to care for patients with rare medical problems and to those in underserved parts of the country.

- Bring Down Barriers to Interstate Telemedicine ([link removed] )

By Shirley Svorny

FEATURED ARTICLES

Another Sign That SCOTUS Isn’t Going to Snatch Back the Freedom to Marry ([link removed] )

The Supreme Court has taken a pass on an Indiana birth certificate case that raised alarm in some gay‐​rights quarters. That’s another sign that it’s not likely to reverse its Obergefell ruling on same‐​sex marriage.

Read More ([link removed] )

Canada Fiscal Record Not Supportive of Keynesian Theory ([link removed] )

As the U.S. economy pulls out of recession, we have huge federal deficits and rising debt, as Canada did in the early 1990s. We should follow the same reform approach: slash spending and pursue microeconomic reforms such as privatization and deregulation.

Read More ([link removed] )

Another Bad Idea: Transit Parity ([link removed] )

A proposal that the federal government should spend as much money on transit as it spends on highways is a terrible idea because highways are a hundred times more productive than transit and the taxes to support transit are mostly regressive, meaning they disproportionately harm low‐​income people.

Read More ([link removed] )

Sign Up For Other Cato Newsletters
([link removed] )

SUPPORT CATO
([link removed] )

Facebook ([link removed] )

LinkedIn ([link removed] )

Twitter ([link removed] )

Instagram ([link removed] )

YouTube ([link removed] )

Cato Institute, 1000 Massachusetts Ave, NW, Washington, DC 20001, (202) 842-0200

Manage preferences ([link removed] )
Screenshot of the email generated on import

Message Analysis