The Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives knows how often police guns turn up in crimes. For years, they just wouldn't tell anyone the answer. But now they will have to share that data.
Some police departments sell their used pistols and shotguns to pay for new weapons. In early 2017, Reveal Investigative Fellow Alain Stephens wanted to know where the resold police weapons from Texas’ largest departments wound up. He filed a public records request with the ATF to find out. The ATF responded by saying that former police guns were indeed ending up in crimes — but refused to provide any additional details.
Reveal’s legal team sued the ATF to compel them to turn over the data on police guns at crime scenes. Led by General Counsel Victoria Baranetsky, Reveal has argued for the last three years that statistical aggregate gun trace data should be made available to reporters because of an exemption in a 2003 amendment that ushered in a new era of secrecy at the ATF. This month, the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals gave Reveal — and reporters all over the country — a big win. As Alain reported:
These reports, which detail the provenance of crime guns, including their first owner and point of sale — live in a massive database, and present an incredible resource for journalists, policymakers, and regular citizens who want to know how guns move from the marketplace to crime scenes.
The court went further, ruling that the government’s duty to disclose records extends to databases.
As Vickie, our attorney, said: “Without access to these electronic banks of information that are swiftly replacing paper records, FOIA would become irrelevant and government accountability would be at risk.”
The court agreed. “Were we to agree with ATF that the results of a search query run across a database necessarily constituted the creation of a new record, we may well render FOIA a nullity in the digital age,” wrote Judge Kim Wardlaw in the majority opinion.
We still don’t know how many police guns wind up involved in crimes. But the ruling this month opens the door to answering this question. This is a win for journalists and, hopefully, a step toward more accountability and transparency at the ATF.
In the Field
Protecting indigenous land in Nicaragua from illegal cattle ranches
|