The Electoral College meets today to cast its vote in the presidential election, another step in the electoral process to certifying Joe Biden being sworn in next month as the 46th President of the United States. President Trump, meanwhile, continues to show the American people he has zero intention of conceding the election and acknowledging Biden’s victory. Presidential concessions are a long-standing tradition in American politics, dating back to 1896, when Republican William McKinley defeated Democrat William Jennings Bryan. Jennings Bryan, upon learning of his loss to McKinley, sent a telegram congratulating his opponent and conceding, "We have submitted the issue to the American people, and their will is law." Since then, every American presidential candidate has conceded upon losing election. Regardless if Trump refuses to observe this tradition, his term will expire at noon on Jan. 20, as outlined in the 20th Amendment. However, withholding a concession speech or tweet not only breaks with tradition but also denies closure on the 2020 presidential election for his supporters, the Republican Party, and those who need it most, the American people. Trump knows what he is doing, and he is holding American democracy hostage by playing these games to the detriment of our electoral system. The election was not stolen, rigged, or in any way fraudulent. Instead, the election was free, fair, and without foreign interference. And it is time Trump concedes. —Mary Anna Mancuso, Media Manager, Stand Up Republic

Welcome to all of our new readers. We're glad you're here! Please help us spread the word about THE TOPLINE by sharing it here.
Shareable version

Violence erupts after SCOTUS decision

It all started on Friday evening. The Supreme Court issued its highly anticipated verdict on the case brought by the attorney general of Texas, seeking to overturn the presidential election results in four states: dismissed. That brought immediate calls for war and secession from outraged MAGA adherents, who were expecting a win and felt betrayed by the justices appointed by President Trump. The next day, Trump supporters gathered in Washington, D.C., to march in protest. As night fell, the demonstrations turned violent. Amid the chaos, at least four people were stabbed in the vicinity of a crowd of "Proud Boys," a White nationalist group that supports the president. —The Washington Post

MORE: In challenging election defeat, Trump cements his control over the Republican Party —The Washington Post

McCarthy: There's no there there

"It has become an article of faith among ardent Trump followers that the election was stolen. The president continues to insist that this is the case, and these flames were further fanned by 19 Republican-controlled state governments, along with 126 Republican members of Congress, who joined the meritless Texas lawsuit, tossed out by the Supreme Court on Friday. The rationalization behind that stunt was that the president has been denied his day in court. But every time a court offers him an opportunity to establish by proof what he is promoting by Twitter, Team Trump folds. Why is that?" —Andrew McCarthy in National Review

Andrew McCarthy is a senior fellow at National Review Institute.

MORE: Kimberly Wehle: There's a way to halt Trump's baseless election fraud cases —Politico

Coronavirus vaccinations begin in the US

As the nation eclipsed 300,000 deaths from COVID-19, a critical care nurse at Long Island Jewish Medical Center in Queens, New York City, made history this morning. She became the first person in her state and among the first people in the United States to get a shot of the Pfizer-BioNTech coronavirus vaccine, authorized on Friday by the Food and Drug Administration.

MORE: Trump to delay early COVID-19 vaccinations of White House staff —Bloomberg

Russian hackers strike federal agencies

The Trump Administration acknowledged yesterday that hackers acting on behalf of a foreign government—almost certainly Russia, according to federal and private experts—broke into a range of key government networks, including in the Homeland Security, Treasury, and Commerce departments, and had free access to their email systems. The hunt is now on to determine if other parts of the government had been affected by what looked to be one of the most sophisticated, and perhaps among the largest, attacks on federal systems in the past five years.

MORE: Israeli spy tech firm says it can break into signal app previously considered safe from hacking —Haaretz
SHARE TOPLINE ON TWITTER SHARE TOPLINE ON TWITTER

Bershidsky: How Russia's guerilla media targets Putin

"An investigative media outlet in today's Russia needs to be light on its feet and hard to pin down. The smaller its footprint in the physical world, especially in Russia, the better it can do its job—and the fewer no-go zones designated for the traditional media matter to it. The journalists who work in these small, flexible, mobile teams are technically savvy. They can work from anywhere, and they can handle data that has been intentionally scrambled to defy analysis. They are creatures of a world deeply alien to Putin, who does not use the internet on his own and often appears to prefer the late 20th century to the modern version of reality." —Leonid Bershidsky in Bloomberg

Leonid Bershidsky is a Russian Berlin-based journalist and a columnist for Bloomberg View.

Barr becomes unlikely Trump target

A tax reporting issue appears to be at the heart of the Department of Justice investigation of President-elect Joe Biden's son Hunter. The investigation, which began in 2018, wasn't publicly disclosed until last week. Why? Because in keeping with department policy, Attorney General Bill Barr warned DOJ prosecutors against issuing subpoenas or taking other public investigative steps before the election. The move has infuriated President Trump.

MORE: Donald Ayer: Trump and Barr wrecked the Justice Department. Here are 6 ways Joe Biden can fix it —USA Today

Ghitis: US at epicenter of global war over democracy

"On a global scale, the battle between democracy and authoritarianism is the defining political contest of our time. Authoritarianism comes in many colors. It is not much of an ideology. Along with its populist mechanisms, it is above all a way for individuals or parties to hold power. That's why we see it on the left—as in Venezuela—and on the right—as in Hungary, Poland, the Philippines—as well as in countries where it’s hard to even position a regime on the left-right continuum, as in Nicaragua. Just as Trump's 2016 election came as a blow to democrats (small d) around the world, his defeat felt like a major victory in that global battle. The battle in the United States is not over. But if the U.S. can solidify and strengthen its democracy enough to withstand the forces attacking it from within, the world's 14-year trend of democratic decline may just begin to reverse." —Frida Ghitis in INSIGHT

Frida Ghitis is a world affairs columnist and analyst. She is the author of "The End of Revolution: A Changing World in the Age of Live Television."

MORE: GOP efforts to overturn election may do lasting harm to democracy, political scientists warn —The Washington Post

Paying it forward

There's no question about it: this year has been tough for so many. But at a Dairy Queen drive-thru in Brainerd, Minn., about 100 miles north of Minneapolis, people stepped up in a small way to show one another that they care. What started as a random act of kindness from one man paying for the car behind him resulted in hundreds of cars also taking part in the pay-it-forward chain.

So, if Trump's legal team can file lawsuit after lawsuit, based on often delusional fabrications, and completely devoid of facts when asked to swear to them in a court of law, why can't poll workers file lawsuits against Rudy Giuliani? He has accused them of federal crimes. He has refused to provide sworn evidence to back up his claims. Many election officials, both Republican and Democrat have been subjected to harassment and threats, even to their spouses and children because of his unproven claims.

If ever there was just cause for lawsuits, Trump, Giuliani, and other Trump sycophants, including several elected officials, have provided it. After he leaves office, could Trump also be liable for damages? When he was running for office, he would not have been acting in his official capacity as president. The people who were defamed by his words are not all public figures. Why can't he be sued for libel? —Bill M., Pennsylvania

The views expressed in "What's Your Take?" are submitted by readers and do not necessarily reflect the views of the editorial staff or the Stand Up Republic Foundation.

Got feedback about THE TOPLINE? Send it to Melissa Amour, Managing Editor, at [email protected].

Did you receive this email from a friend? Sign up at www.thetopline.com.
CARE ABOUT DEMOCRACY? SHARE SOME DEMOCRACY.

If you love THE TOPLINE, share it with your friends and reap the rewards—from a shoutout in an issue of TL, to exclusive swag, to a call with Evan and Mindy.

Your Dashboard has everything you need to easily share THE TOPLINE
and track your progress.
VISIT YOUR DASHBOARD NOW
TO GET STARTED!
The Topline is a project of the Stand Up Republic Foundation.
 
Want to change how you receive these emails?
You can update your preferences or unsubscribe from this list.

700 Pennsylvania Ave SE · Washington, DC 20003-2493 · USA