From APM Reports <[email protected]>
Subject How private money helped save the election
Date December 7, 2020 3:05 PM
  Links have been removed from this email. Learn more in the FAQ.
  Links have been removed from this email. Learn more in the FAQ.
APM Reports



[link removed]

[link removed]
How private money helped save the election
by Geoff Hing, Sabby Robinson, Tom Scheck, and Gracie Stockton

[link removed]



After Congress failed to aid local election offices, a nonprofit provided critical funds — including $350 million from Mark Zuckerberg — that paid for staff, ballot-scanning machines, protective gear, and rental space that helped the presidential election run surprisingly smoothly.



In the weeks since the election, allies of President Trump have included the Center for Tech and Civic Life grants in their voter fraud conspiracy theories. They have challenged the legality and neutrality of the grants, claiming that the funding was aimed at boosting Democratic turnout.



But our analysis of voter registration and voter turnout in three of the five key swing states shows the grant funding had no clear impact on who turned out to vote. Turnout increased across the country from 2016, and counties in Pennsylvania, Georgia and Arizona that received grants didn’t have consistently higher turnout rates than those that didn’t receive money.



&#9659;
[link removed]
Read the story

[link removed]
Preference Center &#x2758;

[link removed]
Unsubscribe

This email was sent by:
American Public Media

480 Cedar Street Saint Paul, MN, 55101
Screenshot of the email generated on import

Message Analysis