From Trevor Potter, Campaign Legal Center <[email protected]>
Subject Attacks on Democracy: What’s the Way Forward?
Date December 3, 2020 3:22 PM
  Links have been removed from this email. Learn more in the FAQ.
  Links have been removed from this email. Learn more in the FAQ.
Access to voting helps both Democrats and Republicans.

View this email in your browser ([link removed]) | Forward to a friend ([link removed]) | DONATE ([link removed])
[link removed]

From the Desk of Trevor Potter

Dear John,
As final vote counts are being certified in states across the country, confirming President-elect Joe Biden’s Electoral College victory, President Trump continues to baselessly attack our democratic institutions and election officials with a “firehose of falsehood ([link removed]) ,” as Brookings’ Jonathan Rauch has described it.

[link removed]

This disorienting information warfare strategy could have profound negative effects in the years ahead.

There’s much to discuss. Today, I will share two thoughts:
First, many Republicans down the ballot won this year with safe, secure voting procedures — including absentee voting — in place. Republican orthodoxy says that restricting access to voting is good for the party, but it is not at all clear that that is true. This is a point I raised with Axios earlier this year ([link removed]) .

President Trump received 11 million more votes in this election than in the previous one. He received the most votes ever for a sitting president. Millions of Republican voters voted by mail. President Trump did well in some states that had high rates of absentee voting, such as Florida and Utah — a state where he significantly improved ([link removed]) on his numbers from four years ago.

Yet President Trump did not win a second term, and it has been argued that his attacks on mail voting depressed his vote in key states. Georgia Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger said in an interview that 24,000 Georgia Republicans who voted absentee in the state’s primary did not vote in the general election ([link removed]) . Raffensperger suggested Trump cost himself the election in Georgia by sowing distrust in absentee voting: "he would have won by 10,000 votes[;] he actually suppressed, depressed his own voting base".

The White House’s messaging on mail voting was often at odds with Republican state officials, many of whom supported changes to make voting accessible during the pandemic. Perhaps this contributed to Republicans doing better than expected in down-ballot races.

Some members of the Pennsylvania state legislature hosted a conference in Gettysburg last week attacking absentee voting. What they weren’t highlighting was the fact that Republicans in the state legislature supported and voted for no-excuse absentee voting in Pennsylvania, and the Pennsylvania Republican Party saw big wins ([link removed]) in the state this year, maintaining their state House and Senate majorities among other victories for them.

Republicans in the U.S. Congress did better than expected, too. Republicans should recognize that helping voters can help their own party. The Republican Party would benefit strategically from embracing expanded access to voting, rather than criticizing it. Our democracy is stronger when every citizen votes, and there is no reason this principle should be at odds with any party’s strategy.

Second thought: it has been a longstanding view ([link removed]) of experts on voting technology that voting machines must have paper trails that can be reviewed, along with official audit processes to check them. While the Trump campaign’s Dominion conspiracy is based on false allegations of compromised software — now debunked by multiple agencies and election officials — it is clear that many Republicans would like the ability to accurately audit ballots after an election, and that is only possible with a paper trail.

In Georgia, the full, by-hand audit of votes cast on the state’s new machines confirmed that the machine tabulation was correct. Today, there are still counties in this country that do not have sufficient systems and procedures in place. Moving forward, there should be bipartisan consensus on the need for checks on voting machines — this is an issue that impacts both parties. Some states perform automatic partial post-election audits as a security measure — a good practice. The democracy community should continue to lead the way on these issues.

Campaign Legal Center is continuing to educate Americans and share insights about the legal processes impacting the finalization of election results. We’ve appeared regularly in online ([link removed]) and broadcast media ([link removed]) , and I hope you’re following our social channels ([link removed]) to stay on top of the latest news.

Our democracy is being tested, but my hope is that the 2020 general election has created opportunities for lasting reform that will help all voters in this country.
Sincerely,

Trevor Potter
President, Campaign Legal Center
Donate ([link removed])

============================================================
** Facebook ([link removed])
** Twitter ([link removed])
** Instagram ([link removed])
The nonpartisan Campaign Legal Center advances democracy through law at the federal, state and local levels, fighting for every American’s rights to responsive government and a fair opportunity to participate in and affect the democratic process.

Copyright © 2020 Campaign Legal Center, All rights reserved.
Our mailing address is:
Campaign Legal Center
1101 14th St NW, Ste 400
Washington, DC xxxxxx
USA
** Unsubscribe from this list ([link removed])
Screenshot of the email generated on import

Message Analysis