From Frank Holub <[email protected]>
Subject Acton News & Commentary | Sep. 18, 2019: Weekly article and media roundup from the Acton Institute
Date September 18, 2019 4:45 PM
  Links have been removed from this email. Learn more in the FAQ.
  Links have been removed from this email. Learn more in the FAQ.
The unreason of reason: Why science can't answer every question; New podcast episode on why the New York Times' '1619 Project' is a lie

Acton Institute ([link removed] )

Acton News & Commentary

The specter of scientism

By Samuel Gregg • September 18, 2019

A graduate student works on a particle accelerator at the SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory ([link removed] )

One pathology characteristic of much post-Enlightenment reasoning is often called “scientism”: treating the scientific method as the only way of knowing anything and everything. Few people would want to do without the material improvements to human life that the natural sciences have achieved. With the scientific method, the Age of Reason bequeathed to us a certain power over nature’s brutal whims. One side-effect of these triumphs was that some began treating the empirical sciences as the only form of true reason and the primary way to discern true knowledge. On the everyday level, scientism appears whenever the language of science is invoked as a trump-card in debate. When someone responds to an argument with “The science says … ” he is often implying that the natural sciences provide the only real standard of objectivity, making the scientist a quasi-religious authority to whom all must defer.

Read the Full Article ([link removed] )

Acton Line Podcast: Why the '1619 Project' is a lie; Yes, we've tried 'real socialism'

September 18, 2019

The headquarters of the New York Times ([link removed] )

In August, the New York Times launched the '1619 Project,' an initiative that includes school curriculum, videos, and a podcast, which aims to "reframe" the history of America's founding around slavery. The Times claims that since the year 1619, "[n]o aspect of the country that would be formed here has been untouched by the years of slavery that followed." So what is the Times trying to accomplish with the '1619 Project'? Ismael Hernandez, founder and director of the Freedom & Virtue Institute, shows how we can thoughtfully approach it. Afterwards, Joshua Muravchik, author of "Heaven on Earth: The Rise, Fall, and Afterlife of Socialism," lays out the history of socialism and explains why socialism has never worked.

Listen to the Episode ([link removed] )

More From Acton

Read about the college loan crisis in the new issue of Religion and Liberty ([link removed] )

Register for the 2019 Business Matters conference today! ([link removed] )

Acton Bookshop end of summer clearance sale ([link removed] )

Trending on the Powerblog

5 facts about the third Democratic debate of 2019 ([link removed] )

The Democratic Party held its third presidential debate on Thursday night. The 10 hopefuls made at least five proposals that were based on erroneous premises or that would harm the country.

UN climate chief: Stop worrying and have babies ([link removed] )

Climate change may well be a problem, but the chief of the United Nations’ agency on climate says it won’t destroy the world – and shouldn’t stop young people from having children. Alarmist rhetoric from “doomsters and extremists” that babies will destroy the planet “resembles religious extremism” and “will only add to [young women’s] burden” by “provoking anxiety,” he said.

5 facts about the U.S. Constitution ([link removed] )

Yesterday was Constitution Day, which is observed every year to remember the Founding Fathers signing the Constitution on September 17, 1787. Here are five facts you need to know about the Constitution.

Only an EU ‘empire’ can secure liberty: EU leader ([link removed] )

Is a European-wide empire compatible with liberty? A prominent EU leader recommended transforming the European Union into an “empire” at a UK political party conference this weekend, to sustained applause.

Charles Dickens, poverty, and emotional arguments ([link removed] )

Why is it that the Industrial Revolution of the 19th century is so often our go-to mental paradigm for poverty? There are a number of possible answers – an increase in the concentration of poverty with growing urbanization and industrialization, which made poverty more visible; the rising standard of living, which made poverty seem less “normal”; or a more visible contrast between wealthy owners and poorer workers. There is surely merit in all of those. But there is another reason that’s also valid, and his name is Charles Dickens.

See all blog posts ([link removed] )

fb ([link removed] )

tw ([link removed] )

yt ([link removed] )

Acton Institute 98 Fulton St E, Grand Rapids, MI 49503

You received this email because you are subscribed to Acton News & Commentary from Acton Institute.

Update your email preferences ([link removed] ) to choose the types of emails you receive.

Unsubscribe from all future emails ([link removed] )
Screenshot of the email generated on import

Message Analysis