European Budget and
Recovery
|
|
As Hungary and Poland block the
approval of the EU Budget and Recovery Fund, we look into Italian,
Polish, Dutch, and Spanish articles on the issue.
|
|
 |
Refusing to budge(t)
|
Corriere della Sera
writes on the package
proposed by the German Presidency of the Council of the European Union
as well as its recent blockage. This package contains the multiannual
budget of the Union (2021-2027), the rule of law mechanism, the
Recovery Fund (Next Generation EU), and the agreement on the EU’s Own
Resources which allows the European Commission to borrow money on the
financial market. At the meeting of the Permanent Representatives
Committee to the EU, the ambassadors of Poland and Hungary voted
against it. Hungarian Prime Minister Viktor Orbán does not want to run
the risk of being denied EU funds as a sanction for rule of law
violations before Hungarian elections in 2022. Recently, two new laws
were introduced by Budapest, one discriminating against gender
minorities and one electoral law preventing the opposition from
uniting against Orbán’s party Fidesz. Hungary and Poland have no
substantive objections, being important beneficiaries of both the
budget and the Recovery Fund. In Budapest in particular, which in 2018
received 6.3 billion euros from cohesion funds, another 7.5 billion
euros from the Next Generation EU are allocated. However, it is the
rule of law mechanism with which Warsaw and Budapest have a problem.
Moreover, according to the Hungarian Prime Minister, it is not just a
question of money. The rule of law mechanism would make it possible to
blackmail a country for ideological reasons and “would transform the
European Union into a new Soviet Union.”
|
|
 |
Fraught finances
|
El País reports on what will happen after the veto
of Hungary and Poland. On Monday, Hungary and Poland blocked the new
EU Budget, including the Recovery Fund. The latest obstructions to the
EU budget have forestalled European aid intended to alleviate the
economic crisis caused by COVID-19. A diplomatic source in the Council
said that “we are heading towards an inevitable clash.” These
subsidies, allocating up to 750 billion euros, are key for Spain and
Italy. The mechanism of the rule of law can be approved by a simple
qualified majority, and thus the German Presidency can rest easy
knowing that both Poland and Hungary are unable to derail it. However,
the decision of the budget, Own Resources, and the Recovery Fund will
require unanimity. “It is inevitable that a delay will occur and that
the conclusion of the entire process will last until early 2021,” said
the source of the Council. The European Commission is considering to
appease Budapest with some type of declarations signed at the highest
level that guarantees a proportionate, balanced and equitable use of
the mechanism of the rule of law, which would only allow the
suspension of funds in the event that the undemocratic drift of a
country flagrantly endanger the financial interests of the
Union.
|
|
 |
Tug of Warsaw
|
Wyborcza writes about what the EU should be doing in
regards to its approach to Hungary and Poland. Despite public
assurances from Polish PM Mateusz Morawiecki, economic success seems a
distant dream for his country and many other Member States, such as
Spain and Italy. The development of events should not surprise anyone,
however. Despite protests in Brussels against the takeover of the
Constitutional Tribunal by the PiS government in 2016, the Polish
authorities have continued to cause controversy. The Minister of
Justice, Zbigniew Ziobro, sent offensive letters to EU Commissioners
and has accelerated the pace of judicial takeovers. Jarosław
Kaczyński, President of PiS, spoke about the need to rebuild the
community so that no Commissioner would dare dictate the Polish
authorities on matters relative to the rule of law. Although Von der
Leyen and her predecessor Jean-Claude Juncker sent negotiators to
Poland, it has not respected subsequent compromises. For the PiS
President and the Minister of Justice, readiness to make concessions
is a sign of weakness. In the case of Hungary, the Union has been even
less proactive. The discussion within the European People's Party on
whether to throw out Fidesz, the populist party of Prime Minister
Viktor Orbán, has already lasted two years.
|
|
 |
Dutch uncle
|
De Volkskrant writes about the lack of ground Dutch PM
Mark Rutte is willing to give in this budgetary dispute. The
Netherlands is intensifying the fight in the European Union for
linking budget funds to rule of law mechanisms. Mark Rutte said that
there is no compromise to be made on such instruments. “The fastest
solution would be to renegotiate and reach a compromise, but that
seems impossible to me,” said Rutte. The Prime Minister has given
thought to a Recovery Fund and a Multiannual Financial Framework
without Poland and Hungary, but emphasised that it is incumbent, not
on the Member States, but on the German Presidency, the European
Parliament and the Commission to find an agreement. If not, said
Rutte, then the Council will have to find a solution. Furthermore,
Rutte said that he “spent three hours trying to find a compromise to
get the term ‘gender equality’ in a text about Africa. That term was
not allowed, because it was contrary to some principle in Hungary and
Poland. It is that serious now.”
|
|
|
|