Will Harvard v. SFFA Head to SCOTUS?
[link removed][UNIQID]
CounterCurrent: Court Upholds Race Preferences in Admissions
Will Harvard v. SFFA Head to SCOTUS?
CounterCurrent is the National Association of Scholars’ weekly newsletter, bringing you the biggest issues in academia and our responses to them.
[link removed][UNIQID]
Category: Racial Preferences; Reading Time: ~2 minutes
------------------------------------------------------------
** Featured Article - Appeals Court Backs Harvard on Affirmative Action by Scott Jaschik ([link removed][UNIQID])
------------------------------------------------------------
The Harvard v. Students for Fair Admissions (SFFA) saga continues, this time with a decision ([link removed][UNIQID]) handed down by the First Circuit Court of Appeals on Thursday. Two of the three judges who heard the case, Jeffrey R. Howard and Sandra L. Lynch, ruled in favor of Harvard (the third, Juan R. Torruella, died in late October) and concluded in their opinion that “There was no error” in Harvard’s admissions processes. “Asian Americans were not illegally discriminated against,” they claim.
Howard and Lynch join Allison D. Burroughs, the Massachusetts District Judge who sided ([link removed][UNIQID]) with Harvard just over a year ago, in upholding racial preferences in college admissions. After SFFA’s appeal of Burroughs' 2019 decision, the National Association of Scholars went on to file an amicus curiae brief ([link removed][UNIQID]) in their support. The Department of Justice joined us ([link removed][UNIQID]) .
Responses to the latest ruling have been rather predictable. According to Scott Jaschik of Inside Higher Ed ([link removed][UNIQID]) ,
Edward Blum, president of Students for Fair Admissions … said, “While we are disappointed with the opinion of the First Circuit Court of Appeals, our hope is not lost. This lawsuit is now on track to go up to the U.S. Supreme Court, where we will ask the justices to end these unfair and unconstitutional race-based admissions policies at Harvard and all colleges and universities.”
Harvard president Lawrence S. Bacow said, “ … The consideration of race, alongside many other factors, helps us achieve our goal of creating a student body that enriches the education of every student. Diversity also represents a pathway for excellence for both Harvard and the nation. We will continue to defend these principles and our admissions process all the way to the Supreme Court, if necessary.”
The circuit court’s decision ([link removed][UNIQID]) is a win-win for Harvard and a lose-lose for SFFA. First, the court affirmed the legitimacy of Harvard’s so-called “holistic admissions process,” writing that “Harvard has demonstrated that it values all types of diversity, not just racial diversity.” We note that “all types of diversity” may be code for more discrimination (based on sex, national origin, sexuality, etc.), not less.
At the same time, the court disagreed with SFFA’s argument that Harvard has a quota for Asian-American admits: “The amount by which the share of admitted Asian American applicants fluctuates is greater than the amount by which the share of Asian American applicants fluctuates. This is also true for Hispanic and African American applicants. It is the opposite of what one would expect if Harvard imposed a quota. … The district court properly concluded that Harvard does not utilize quotas and does not engage in racial balancing.”
For more details on the circuit court’s ruling, check out Jaschik’s full breakdown for IHE ([link removed][UNIQID]) .
In response to the district court’s ruling last year, NAS President Peter Wood said plainly “Race should play no role in college admissions. Colleges and universities should concern themselves with life of the mind, not the color of their students’ skin.” We stand by this principle and hope that SFFA appeals their case once again, this time to the Supreme Court. Should they do so, they will have our full support.
Until next week.
John David
Communications Associate
National Association of Scholars
Read More ([link removed][UNIQID])
For more on racial preferences in college admissions:
[link removed][UNIQID]
November 17, 2020
** Surprise! Americans Oppose Discrimination ([link removed][UNIQID])
------------------------------------------------------------
John Rosenberg
When you spell out what "affirmative action" actually entails, Americans of every stripe vote against it. Race and sex preferences only pass when lawmakers obfuscate their true meaning.
[link removed][UNIQID]
November 4, 2020
** California Votes to Keep Ban on Race and Sex Discrimination ([link removed][UNIQID])
------------------------------------------------------------
National Association of Scholars
Proposition 16 has failed to pass in California, ensuring that the state cannot legally discriminate or grant preferential treatment to people based on race, ethnicity, national origin, or sex.
[link removed][UNIQID]
October 09, 2020
** Department of Justice Sues Yale for Racial Discrimination in Admissions ([link removed][UNIQID])
------------------------------------------------------------
John David
In August, Yale College was warned that it must make changes to its racially discriminatory admissions practices. It failed to do so and now faces a federal lawsuit.
[link removed][UNIQID]
May 26, 2020
** Testing Affirmative Action ([link removed][UNIQID])
------------------------------------------------------------
George W. Dent and Hal R. Arkes
The Supreme Court has held that courts must strictly scrutinize systems that give preferences to people based on their race. Judges need to insist on disaggregated data and evidence that a university has truly proven that “diverse” classrooms lead to better education.
** About the NAS
------------------------------------------------------------
The National Association of Scholars, founded in 1987, emboldens reasoned scholarship and propels civil debate. We’re the leading organization of scholars and citizens committed to higher education as the catalyst of American freedom.
============================================================
Follow NAS on social media.
** Facebook ([link removed][UNIQID])
** Twitter ([link removed][UNIQID])
** YouTube ([link removed][UNIQID])
** Website ([link removed][UNIQID])
** Donate ([link removed][UNIQID])
| ** Join ([link removed][UNIQID])
| ** Renew ([link removed][UNIQID])
| ** Bookstore ([link removed][UNIQID])
Copyright © 2020 National Association of Scholars, All rights reserved.
You are receiving this email because you opted in via our website, membership or donation forms, contact forms at events, or by signing open letters.
Our mailing address is:
National Association of Scholars
420 Madison Avenue
7th Floor
New York, NY 10017-2418
USA
Want to change how you receive these emails?
You can ** update your preferences ([link removed])
or ** unsubscribe from this list ([link removed])
.
