Unsurprisingly, the president is pursuing his stated plan to undermine our election for his own desired benefit. He's falsely declaring victory based on incomplete election results, and is claiming that the normal counting of votes, which happens in every election, is evidence of "fraud." This is why he has repeatedly discredited vote-by-mail and undermined U.S. Postal Service operations: so that he could suppress and call into question as many legal votes as possible in key states with extremely tight margins. Every vote must be counted, and state officials must stand firm and hold the line on this. That is how the system works. We don't know the outcome of the presidential race yet, and neither does Donald Trump. Stay calm, stay patient. It's far from over. —Evan McMullin

Please let us know how we're doing by taking five minutes to complete our 2020 reader survey. Thank you for reading THE TOPLINE!

Welcome to all of our new readers. We're glad you're here! Please help us spread the word about THE TOPLINE by sharing it here.
Shareable version

And the winner is...?

Donald Trump stayed true to form last night, claiming victory in the 2020 presidential election despite the fact that neither side has yet reached 270 electoral votes and millions of votes are still being counted. He also falsely continued to assert election fraud and pledged to mount multiple legal challenges to official state results. By contrast, his Democratic challenger, Joe Biden, speaking last night in Delaware, said that while he believes "we're on track to win this election," patience is necessary. "It ain't over till every vote is counted," he said. —The Washington Post

MORE: We have never had final results on Election Day —The New York Times

USPS dropped the ball

The U.S. Postal Service failed to deliver a significant percentage of mail-in ballots yesterday in several states that could determine who wins the presidential contest between President Trump and former Vice President Joe Biden, a court filing revealed today.

All eyes on Pennsylvania

Pennsylvania is an election battleground state that could ultimately decide the election, which is why Donald Trump has been so focused on suppressing mail-in ballots there. He isn't the only one though. State Republicans are challenging the validity of absentee voting, which was expanded this year due to the coronavirus pandemic. Two federal lawsuits aim to prevent the votes from being counted, and the GOP already has laid the groundwork at the U.S. Supreme Court for an effort to exclude ballots that arrive after Election Day, even if they were postmarked by Nov. 3. —GoErie

O'Mara: Social media can't fix elections

"Social media operates in a very similar way as Revolutionary-era printers and pamphleteers. The outrage on its newsfeeds echoes the sensationalist newspapers of the Gilded Age. Yet neither Thomas Paine nor Joseph Pulitzer could operate with the speed, scale, and precision of tech platforms. Neither can newspapers or television networks today. What's more, none have the global reach and targeting of social media apps, which have sowed electoral havoc near and far. When older forms of media became the dominant platforms for political communication, they lost the right to regulate themselves. So it won't be up to Silicon Valley to save democracy. It will be up to us: the social media users, voters, and government. It's been our job all along." —Margaret O'Mara in The New York Times

Ed. Note: Columnist Margaret O'Mara covers history, technology, business, and U.S. politics.

SHARE TOPLINE ON TWITTER SHARE TOPLINE ON TWITTER

O'Regan: Is populism killing international affairs?

"The world is now at risk of being run on China's authoritarian and communist terms, rather than the U.S.'s terms of freedom that have run world affairs for the last 75 years. This is all quite scary, and it shows the dangers that populism and nationalism have on world affairs. But it also begs the question, is there any way back for globalism and international cooperation?" —Patrick O'Regan in Berkeley Squares

Ed. Note: Patrick O'Regan is a writer, educator, and entrepreneur.


MORE: European leaders react with caution as Trump falsely claims victory —The Guardian

No bloodbath in the Senate

The highly anticipated blue landslide in the Senate didn't happen. Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell of Kentucky won his seventh term, easily defeating Democratic nominee Amy McGrath, and is expected to retain his post as Senate Republican leader. McGrath, a former Marine fighter pilot, painted McConnell as a symbol of Washington's dysfunction during the coronavirus pandemic. But McConnell, at one time viewed with suspicion by his party's base, benefited from his relationship with President Trump, who is popular in the state. —The Hill

MORE: Sen. Susan Collins of Maine is re-elected, further dimming Democratic hopes of Senate control —The New York Times

Levin: No matter who wins, we must change

"We tend to look at forms of breakdown in our society in terms of what they produce: anger, cynicism, a rejection of tradition. But we would be wise to also consider what they implicitly demand and yearn for: responsibility, integrity and, above all, solidarity. Our national politics needs these, too. But they will come from below—from local and state government, where it's harder to avoid dealing with concrete problems, and from civil society, where we encounter one another on a personal level. We cannot stand with our arms folded and hope we've finally elected the people who will deliver them. They must begin with us, where we are." —Yuval Levin in The New York Times

Ed. Note: Yuval Levin, the director of social, cultural, and constitutional studies at the American Enterprise Institute and the editor of National Affairs, is the author of “A Time to Build: From Family and Community to Congress and the Campus, How Recommitting to Our Institutions Can Revive the American Dream.”

"This is more than a deficit of decency (though it is that, too). It's a frontal assault on the Republic. Let’s stand united against this, no matter who you voted for. Count every ballot. —Jon Meacham, presidential historian (@jmeacham)

I voted by mail in Pennsylvania. I filled out my application in May, received my ballot in the mail on October 14, and dropped it off on October 19. My ballot was received on October 21. To think that my ballot could possibly not be counted because of the president's blatant ignorance and disrespect of the U.S. Constitution and its values disgusts me.

How can Trump's base, who claims to love America and the Consitution so dearly, be in favor of not counting every single vote? They don't love America. They love Trump. So much so that they are willing to sacrifice democracy for him.

Voting is an essential part of our democracy, and every single vote should be counted. Period. —Lauren A., Pennsylvania

The views expressed in "What's Your Take?" are submitted by readers and do not necessarily reflect the views of the editorial staff or the Stand Up Republic Foundation.

Got feedback about THE TOPLINE? Send it to Melissa Amour, Managing Editor, at [email protected].

Did you receive this email from a friend? Sign up at www.thetopline.com.
CARE ABOUT DEMOCRACY? SHARE SOME DEMOCRACY.

If you love THE TOPLINE, share it with your friends and reap the rewards—from a shoutout in an issue of TL, to exclusive swag, to a call with Evan and Mindy.

Your Dashboard has everything you need to easily share THE TOPLINE
and track your progress.
VISIT YOUR DASHBOARD NOW
TO GET STARTED!
The Topline is a project of the Stand Up Republic Foundation.
 
Want to change how you receive these emails?
You can update your preferences or unsubscribe from this list.

700 Pennsylvania Ave SE · Washington, DC 20003-2493 · USA