From Cato Today <[email protected]>
Subject Pros and Cons of the Electoral College
Date November 4, 2020 12:04 PM
  Links have been removed from this email. Learn more in the FAQ.
  Links have been removed from this email. Learn more in the FAQ.
John Samples discusses the costs and benefits of an electoral college. A win against qualified immunity in "clearly established law".

View in browser ([link removed] )

November 4, 2020

Supreme Court 2 ([link removed] )

An Encouraging Decision Against Qualified Immunity ([link removed] )

For the first time in sixteen years, the Supreme Court issued a qualified immunity decision in which it held that the defendants’ actions violated “clearly established law.”

- SCOTUS Decides That Inhumane Treatment of a Prisoner Violated "Clearly Established Law" ([link removed] )

By Jay Schweikert

Is the Electoral College a Good Idea? ([link removed] )

samples-pod ([link removed] )

Apple Podcast Listen Badge ([link removed] )

google-play-badge-1 ([link removed] )

Spotify Podcast Button ([link removed] )

Some people claim the Electoral College, the method by which Americans choose a President, has racist origins, that it protects rural states at the expense of big cities, and that the institution should be replaced by a national popular vote. John Samples discusses the claims.

- Costs and Benefits of the Electoral College ([link removed] )

Featuring John Samples and Caleb O. Brown

LISTEN NOW
([link removed] )

FEATURED ARTICLES

Right to Offend Is an Inalienable Part of Right to Religious Freedom, Free Speech ([link removed] )

Those offended are welcome to protest peacefully, but not to gag or kill the offenders.

Read More ([link removed] )

Maritime Protectionism Raises the Cost of Offshore Wind ([link removed] )

To boost offshore wind energy legislators should remove protectionist maritime laws such as the Jones Act that hinder the industry’s growth.

Read More ([link removed] )

Insult after Injury: the Nomination of Anthony Kennedy ([link removed] )

The problem with Kennedy is that even if he had a coherent view of the Constitution, his jurisprudence was often inscrutable.

Read More ([link removed] )

Sign Up For Other Cato Newsletters
([link removed] )

SUPPORT CATO
([link removed] )

Facebook ([link removed] )

LinkedIn ([link removed] )

Twitter ([link removed] )

Instagram ([link removed] )

YouTube ([link removed] )

Cato Institute, 1000 Massachusetts Ave, NW, Washington, DC 20001, (202) 842-0200

Manage preferences ([link removed] )
Screenshot of the email generated on import

Message Analysis