The key date for mailing in tax returns is April 15. That's the day they have to be postmarked by.
If a tax return has an April 15 postmark, the taxpayer is never fined or penalized no matter when the return is received by the IRS: the taxpayer is presumed to have kept up his or her end of the bargain. To punish them for inefficiency in the Postal Service over which they have no control would neither be just or fair.
So why shouldn't this "postmark rule" also apply to mail-in ballots? If a voter has complied with the rules, is it fair for them to lose their vote because the post office didn't do its job properly?
This fear is especially relevant this year, when a postmaster general, who is a large Trump contributor and has promised to bring down postal costs, may delay delivery of ballots in communities in swing states that have heavy concentrations of Democratic voters.
Could postal worker overtime be limited or eliminated in Philadelphia? Could sorting machines be taken out of service in Milwaukee? Could delivery trucks in Detroit all "require" oil changes or brake repair at the same time?
Louis DeJoy built his fortune and his reputation as a master of logistics. A person who can devise ways to move stuff quickly and cheaply might also be able to devise ways to not move stuff. —Jim V., New York
|