From xxxxxx <[email protected]>
Subject Strike for Democracy!
Date October 27, 2020 12:00 AM
  Links have been removed from this email. Learn more in the FAQ.
  Links have been removed from this email. Learn more in the FAQ.
[If Trump stays in office by subverting the democratic process,
the implications for unions are grave. A network of union leaders and
activists have formed Labor Action to Defend Democracy to begin
planning labor actions after November 3rd. ] [[link removed]]

STRIKE FOR DEMOCRACY!  
[[link removed]]

 

Stephanie Luce
October 26, 2020
Organizing Upgrade
[[link removed]]

*
[[link removed]]
*
[[link removed]]
*
* [[link removed]]

_ If Trump stays in office by subverting the democratic process, the
implications for unions are grave. A network of union leaders and
activists have formed Labor Action to Defend Democracy to begin
planning labor actions after November 3rd. _

Don't Let Trump Steal the Election,

 

The labor movement is facing an existential crisis on two levels. Most
immediate is that posed by Donald Trump, who has already stoked the
fuel of white supremacist terror groups, and who has made repeated
suggestions that he will not step down from office no matter the
outcome of the election. Despite his support from a share of union
members, and despite his promises to improve lives for workers,
Trump’s regime has been almost an unmitigated attack on worker’s
rights. If Trump stays in office by subverting the democratic process,
the implications for unions are grave.

To deal with this immediate crisis, a network of union leaders and
activists have formed Labor Action to Defend Democracy
[[link removed]]
to begin planning labor actions after November 3 if Trump loses but
refuses to step down.

Beyond the immediate danger of a coup, the labor movement must contend
with the reality of a world run by billionaires on the backs of
workers. Even if Biden wins, the labor movement faces a difficult
future. The Wall Street wing of the Democratic Party will claim
responsibility for getting Biden elected, and they will use the
economy as an excuse to extract further concessions from workers.
Biden was not selected by the groundswell of progressive forces active
in the party’s primary; his platform is much weaker than those of
Bernie Sanders or Elizabeth Warren, and history doesn’t give us
confidence that he will fight hard even for that.

Workers have been under attack for decades but we are at a critical
juncture. Can unions come together to insist on a democratic election
and ensure every vote is counted?

We face a tumultuous few months, so we need a short-term, urgent plan.
Part I of this article focuses on the immediate crisis. But we also
have a long-term fight ahead of us, no matter what happens. That will
be covered in Part II (to be published post-election). The points I
raise here reflect my own involvement over many years of labor
activism as well as discussions with labor leaders, staffers and
rank-and-file organizers across the country.

THE NEXT FEW MONTHS

 Trump and the Republican Party have launched a full-fledged assault
on the electoral process, from voter suppression
[[link removed]]
to misleading ballot boxes
[[link removed]].
We may see violence aimed at keeping people from the polls or just
meant to create general fear and chaos.  Trump has dropped repeated
suggestions that he may try to shut down the election, stop votes from
being counted, or refuse to step down even if he loses.

A range of groups have mobilized to fight for a fair election and plan
around worst case scenarios. Some unions have been active in a few of
these groups, such as Protect the Vote.

According to experts who study coups
[[link removed]],
the best way to stop an electoral coup is by getting a large turnout
and strong victory. The larger a vote for Biden, the smaller the space
Trump will have to claim the vote is illegitimate. Unions are doing
their part to make this happen. This is a major part of union activity
every election cycle. But according to Bob Master, Assistant to the
Vice President of District 1 of the Communications Workers, it was
tough to get union members to volunteer for Hilary Clinton four years
ago. This year, there are hundreds of members signed up to phone bank,
some doing it three or four nights a week. It isn’t that they are
necessarily Biden fans, he says, but they understand what is at stake.

UNITE HERE is running an intensive “Take Back 2020
[[link removed]]” get-out-the-vote
effort, phone banking and even knocking on doors in Arizona, Florida,
Nevada and Pennsylvania. In Philadelphia, for example, over 100
hospitality workers plan to visit 100,000 homes
[[link removed]]
before the election. In Arizona they are partnering with Seed the
Vote. [[link removed]]

Unions such as the Communications Workers of America, SEIU, AFT and
the UAW are looking to connect some of their core activists with local
“protect the vote” groupings in key states and cities to show up
to polls and fight to make sure every vote is counted.

Unions are increasingly turning attention to possible election
scenarios. “There’s some sense in the leadership that in fascist
countries, unions are at the top of the list of targets,” Master
says. “And it is the role of unions, which are the guarantors of
some measure of democracy in the workplace, to ensure that democracy
survives in the society.”

A handful of activists have started to organize in their workplace for
labor to be ready to respond. Postal workers in Detroit
[[link removed]]
are handing out flyers that ask coworkers to sign a pledge from Choose
Democracy, committing to vote then take action if needed to protect
the vote.

ARE UNIONS READY?

Will unions be ready to strike if Trump won’t step down? The sizable
share of union members backing Trump makes it tough for some unions to
frame the fight as anti-Trump, or pro-Biden. But if unions commit to
the integrity of the democratic process, they have more ground to
stand on.

The Rochester Central Labor Council in New York passed a resolution
[[link removed]]
calling for a general strike in the event that Trump loses and does
not step down. The resolution calls on the national AFL-CIO and all
other labor organizations to “prepare for and enact a general
strike, if necessary, to ensure a Constitutionally mandated peaceful
transition of power as a result of the 2020 Presidential Elections.”
A handful of other labor bodies have followed suit.

Sara Nelson, International President of the Association of Flight
Attendants-CWA, AFL-CIO, is also taking a bold stand, stating that in
the event of a contested election,  labor “has to be ready to
mobilize in a series of strikes or leading to a general strike.”
[[link removed]] Despite high
unemployment, workers still have power, she says. She points to how
the federal government ended its shutdown last year, after Nelson
spoke publicly about the idea of a general strike and a handful of air
traffic controllers did not show up for their shifts. “Where can we
actually flex that muscle in a series of strikes . . . in a way that
is going to be very effective?” she asks.  “And frankly, if the
planes all stop that is something that will grab everyone’s
attention and suddenly there has to be action to fix that.”

Writers following these discussions have described some of the history
and challenges
[[link removed]]
of general strikes. We have never had an actual national general
strike in the U.S., although some have argued that the 2006
immigration protests were a version of one. And W.E. B. DuBois made a
case in _Black Reconstruction_
[[link removed]] that up to a half a
million enslaved workers held a general strike during the Civil War,
by stopping work and leaving plantations.

Strikes are rare in the U.S. Despite the mini-strike wave of 2018-19,
most union members have never been on strike, and few unions prepare
to do so. And of course, it is illegal for many public sector unions
to strike, and in some states the penalties can be stiff. Even in the
private sector, most unions also have no-strike clauses in their
contracts, meaning to strike during the life of the contract is
violating the terms.

Finally, when workers do strike, it is usually for their own wages and
working conditions: an economic strike. To pull off a job action in
defense of democracy means moving to a political strike: something the
U.S. labor movement has even less experience with. “Just getting
workers to strike for their own contract is really hard,” says Liz
Perlman, Executive Director of AFSCME 3299. “Most people just
don’t do it. And we don’t teach strikes, we don’t talk the
language of strikes in labor.”

IT HAS HAPPENED BEFORE

But this does not mean it can’t happen. Despite legal restrictions
and stiff penalties, the Transport Workers Union Local 100 in New York
City has struck three times in the past several decades. Teachers in
West Virginia, Oklahoma, Kentucky and Arizona went out on strike in
2018 even though they do not have the formal right to do so. Postal
workers launched one of the largest national strikes in US history in
1970, despite it being illegal.

And we have even seen examples of political strikes in the US. The
International Longshore and Warehouse Union (ILWU) has engaged in
multiple political strikes, from protest against South African
apartheid, against the Gulf War, and in support of Black Lives Matter.
Teachers in Wisconsin walked off the job in large numbers in 2011
after Scott Walker proposed his budget bill that would drastically cut
union rights.

In 2016 the Chicago Teachers Union held a one-day strike
[[link removed]]
that had wide participation across the city. According to Alex Han, a
longtime labor organizer, in addition to almost 100 percent
participation by teachers, there were job actions at a few fast-food
restaurants, daycare centers, a public university, a Nabisco plant,
and more. Workers left their jobs to join actions happening all over
the city. They were joined by supporters from other movements,
including leadership from the Movement for Black Lives, and over 40
community groups.

Han explains, “There is a tension in organizing between going deep
and going wide. With a strike, a job action where people are taking a
real serious risk with their livelihood, you have to go
deep. But then the question is, how do you go deep in as many places
as possible, in some sort of aligned fashion?” The CTU one-day
strike showed the possibilities of deep and wide organizing
happening altogether. It wasn’t a general strike, but, says Han,
“it was an illegal political strike.”

In June 2020, on one day’s notice the CWA called for a national 8
minute, 46 second walkout
[[link removed]]
to protest the murder of George Floyd and voice support for Black
Lives Matter. “This was certainly the first time in my 40 some-odd
years in the labor movement that I had seen a union essentially call a
political work stoppage,” says Bob Master. “Now 8 minutes and 46
seconds is very different than one day or two days or three days of
completely stopping work but it did suggest that something that was
essentially inconceivable in April happened in June and there was very
little hesitation on the part of the leadership.”  The leadership,
and members, felt that what happened was so outrageous it demanded a
response.

In August, unionized professional athletes refused to play in support
of Black Lives Matter. A handful of unions signed a pledge in support,
committing to job actions and strikes to support the Strike for Black
lives.

NOT NORMAL TIMES

Political strikes are now on the agenda more than they have been in
many years.

In normal times strikes can take years to plan. Alex Caputo-Pearl, NEA
Vice-President of the United Teachers Los Angeles, led a large
successful teacher strike in 2019. “We knew we needed to strike four
years ahead of time, that we wanted to shift the political
dynamics,” he says. They spent four years building the support and
laying the groundwork necessary to pull off the strike. Still, he
says, “We are in a very dynamic period. There are many legitimate
demands right now that we should be organizing around, and I would
never want to discourage anyone from taking action.”

And while the labor movement may not normally train leaders to strike,
over the past two months, thousands of labor activists
[[link removed]]
from 70 countries participated in a Strike School run by organizer
Jane McAlevey and sponsored by the Rosa Luxemburg Stiftung
[[link removed]].

While some local-level labor leaders may be willing to take the risks
to lead strike actions, others might be able to at least know how to
step back and let movements lead when the time comes. “Let’s
assume a time comes when workers feel that they need to withhold their
labor,” says Lauren Jacobs,  Executive Director of the Partnership
for Working Families. Union leaders have a responsibility, when they
are in elected office, to protect their institutions and this can put
a conservative brake on striking. But Jacobs suggests leaders can at
least not default to this position. Instead of putting up barriers,
leaders must ask: “How do we embrace whatever is unfolding?”
Whether their own rank and file members, or others, are taking to the
streets, union leaders will need to step in to enable and nurture the
movement.

In 2006, when immigrant workers struck and protested around the
country, some union leaders held back and tried to rein in strike
activity. Jacobs hopes we don’t repeat that approach. The more union
leaders have connections with community groups at the local level, and
rooted in the local context, they will be better positioned to support
whatever emerges. For example, when New York City bus drivers refused
to transport protestors to jail this summer, the unions stepped in to
support the drivers and support the unplanned action.

LABOR ACTION TO DEFEND DEMOCRACY

Anticipating the possibility of electoral interference, a coalition of
unions and labor leaders, staffers, and activists have convened
“Labor Action to Defend Democracy” (LADD), to coordinate
post-election actions. LADD will “plant seeds and stir the pot, make
available tools and be ready to do what is needed to protect
democracy.”

The initial formation includes leaders from the Chicago Teachers Union
(CTU – AFT Local 1); Brotherhood of Maintenance of Way (BMWE –
Teamsters); Carl Rosen, president of UE (United Electrical Workers);
Sara Nelson, president of the Flight Attendants union; Gene Bruskin,
long time union organizer; National Nurses United; ILWU and
International Longshoremen’s Association locals; United University
Professions (UUP – AFT 2190 for SUNY faculty and staff); and Jobs
With Justice. Other labor bodies are joining each day.

“LADD is a network helping unions to connect geographically and
help them link to actions by broader fight back network in their
area,” Norine Gutekanst from the Chicago Teachers Union explains.
“We are sharing resolutions that locals/labor councils have passed,
resources (sample resolutions, pledges, petitions, memes) and
encouraging unions to act.” LADD is working closely with the
non-labor driven coalitions, Protect the Results, led by Indivisible,
and the Democracy Defense Coalition, led by the FightBack Table.
Unions, including SEIU, CWA, and UNITE-HERE are active in these two
coalitions. Protect the Results has a website with a map
[[link removed]] where people can schedule protests
the day after Election Day, November 4th. The groups are prepared to
make decisions late November 3 or early November 4th about the plan
for action.

_For more information contact [email protected]._

_Stephanie Luce is a professor at the School of Labor and Urban
Studies/CUNY. She is the author of Labor Movements: Global
Perspectives and Fighting for a Living Wage. Her writing can be found
at stephanieluce.net. _

*
[[link removed]]
*
[[link removed]]
*
* [[link removed]]

 

 

 

INTERPRET THE WORLD AND CHANGE IT

 

 

Submit via web [[link removed]]
Submit via email
Frequently asked questions [[link removed]]
Manage subscription [[link removed]]
Visit xxxxxx.org [[link removed]]

Twitter [[link removed]]

Facebook [[link removed]]

 




[link removed]

To unsubscribe, click the following link:
[link removed]
Screenshot of the email generated on import

Message Analysis

  • Sender: Portside
  • Political Party: n/a
  • Country: United States
  • State/Locality: n/a
  • Office: n/a
  • Email Providers:
    • L-Soft LISTSERV