From Steven Cohen <[email protected]>
Subject Australia Begins Enforcing its Online Extremist Content Law
Date September 13, 2019 2:55 PM
  Links have been removed from this email. Learn more in the FAQ.
  Links have been removed from this email. Learn more in the FAQ.
Tech & Terrorism: Australia Begins Enforcing its Online Extremist Content Law

Tech Companies Can No Longer Rely On False Claims

(New York, N.Y.) - Australia has ordered <[link removed]> five websites to remove extremist material, in an move to enforce its new law to combat online extremism. The content consisted of videos showing the beheading of a Scandinavian tourist in Morocco and the Christchurch attacks. The new law holds social media companies, websites, and Internet service providers liable for fines of up to 10 percent of their annual global turnover if they fail to promptly remove the offending material. Company executives could face possible jail time for non-compliance.

“Since Australia passed the legislation in April, the tech industry has demagogued the government’s efforts to prevent the spread of extremist content online. Tech has continued to promote the same ominous arguments, claiming that the new legislation will hinder free speech <[link removed]>, lead to over-blocking material <[link removed]>, and stifle innovation <[link removed]>,” said Counter Extremism Project (CEP) Executive Director David Ibsen. “Following the law’s implementation, however, the tech industry should be forced to provide clear evidence to support its claims that the measure definitively leads to a systematic, catastrophic scenario where users’ free speech is violated and the tech industry ceases to develop.”

CEP has seen this pattern of behavior play out before when Germany passed its NetzDG law <[link removed]>, which fines online platforms for failures to delete illegal hate speech and went into effect in 2018. Tech companies criticized the German legislation and also argued that smaller firms would not be able to afford to comply and that content would be over-blocked as a result. However, an investigation <[link removed]> on the NetzDG’s impact conducted by CEP and the Centre For European Policy Studies (CEPS) found no evidence of over-blocking, false positives, or burdensome compliance costs related to the law.

As Ibsen stated in a joint op-ed <[link removed]> at the time, “In reality, concerns that NetzDG would lead to censorship have proven unfounded. Its introduction has precipitated a trickle rather than a flood of reports. Research by the Counter Extremism Project (CEP) has uncovered no further evidence of false positives and shows that three quarters of reports are not upheld by social media companies. There have been no fines imposed on companies and little change in overall takedown rates (21.2% for Facebook and 10.8% for Twitter).”

None of these cataclysms materialized in Germany, and the tech industry can no longer rely on such claims—in Australia or elsewhere—that have failed to materialize.



-=-=-
The Counter Extremism Project - United States
This email was sent to [email protected]. To stop receiving emails: [link removed]
-=-=-

Created with NationBuilder - [link removed]
Screenshot of the email generated on import

Message Analysis

  • Sender: Counter Extremism Project
  • Political Party: n/a
  • Country: n/a
  • State/Locality: n/a
  • Office: n/a
  • Email Providers:
    • NationBuilder