Dear
Fellow Patriot, The Federal Reserve just can’t stand the thought of anyone competing with
their central banking cartel. Since the $6 trillion CARES Act passed and was signed on March
27th by President Trump, the price of the cryptocurrency Bitcoin has doubled from around $6,500 to $13,000. That’s in no small part due to the
unprecedented money printing by the Fed, to fulfill the terms of this bailout. Of course, when the Fed sees this predictable move in a competing currency, they start thinking they have to launch their
own cryptocurrency, before the dollar finally implodes. While Bitcoin may still not be a very
widely used way to pay for goods and services, another digital money platform, PayPal, has really taken off in that regard.
PayPal is perhaps the best way ever designed to move money from one person to another. Yet it started in failure.
In his book, “Zero to One: Notes on Startups, or How to Build the Future,” founder Peter
Thiel explains that PayPal was originally intended to allow owners of PalmPilots to beam money to each other. That idea did not work, but it evolved
into using similar technology on eBay auctions. The point is PayPal was a private company
competing in the market economy. That meant it was subject to market discipline. It had to develop an effective product or it would go out of
business. The same thing cannot be said of the federal government. In its latest bad idea,
movement is building for the Federal Reserve to establish its own cryptocurrency exchange to compete with others in the marketplace and even replace
physical cash. “It is inevitable,” Federal Reserve Bank of Philadelphia President
Patrick Harker reportedly said at a recent conference. “I think it is better for us to start getting our hands around it.”
It’s an apt metaphor, since what the Fed always wants to choke
off is any competition to its monetary monopoly. This comes hot on the heels of another bad idea, called FedNow, which is supposed to speed up the
processing of financial transactions. Speed is great, of course. It can take a full business
day for transactions to clear. That’s too slow in our 21st century world of instant communication.
But the Fed is late to the party. The Clearing House launched a real-time payment system two years ago that now reaches half the banks in the
country. It’s expected to be everywhere by next year. Judging by the non-answers that the
central bank has given to members of Congress on its interoperability with private sector systems, FedNow would seemingly not compete on a level
playing field; it would simply use the power of the federal government to crush a private-sector competitor.
Proponents of a Fed-run crypto exchange argue that such an exchange could stop the current delays in the U.S. bank transfers entirely on
its own. This thought proves just how bad the Fed is at making good investments, anticipating changes in technology, and keeping up with the speed of
innovation. If board members of the central bank believe that blockchain may soon supplant the
need for real-time payment services like FedNow, why the Fed would spend the next 3-5 years building FedNow from scratch when The Clearing House
already offers the same type of service is beyond me. The Fed should stay out of the way and
let the private sector blockchain and real-time payments marketplaces settle this debate. Instead, the central bank seems poised to set itself up as
both the regulator of all monetary exchanges and a participant in that business. Without
assurances on interoperability from the central bank, businesses will always choose the Fed’s offerings instead of a private company’s,
since doing so would make the business look better to its regulator. The Fed cannot handle real
competition, and so it is trying to shut it down. It worries about Bitcoin, it worries about The Clearing House, and it will be worried about the next
bright idea for money sharing that comes along. It’s got a monopoly to protect. We need
to open up the field for new forms of money. While I served in Congress, I introduced the Free Competition in Currency Act, which would have defined
money as whatever people are willing to trade with each other, whether that’s paper, tokens of some sort, or direct barter. It would have ended
the Fed’s power to declare that only certain pieces of paper are currency. Let’s
allow companies to compete, and let the market set the value. That’s where the next PayPal will come from, and consumers everywhere will be the
winners. For Liberty, Ron Paul, M.D. Chairman
Respect for the Constitution, the rule of law,
individual liberty, sound money, and a constitutional foreign policy constitute the foundation of the Campaign for
Liberty.
|