Weekly Round-Up

Quincy in the news

October 25, 2020

UPCOMING WEBINARS

The US military’s role in a contested election

Date: Wednesday, October 28, 2020
Time: 2:00pm Eastern

 
REGISTER

What role, if any, might the United States military play if the results of the upcoming presidential election are contested? Concerns have been raised that the president could call in the military to quell protests before or after the election, or that the military will be called in to remove the president if he loses and refuses to leave.

Please join Quincy Institute President Andrew Bacevich for this critical discussion with Amber Smith, a veteran Army pilot and served in the Trump Administration’s DoD as a Deputy Assistant to the Secretary of Defense, and Mark Hertling, former Commanding General of US Army Europe. Quincy Institute Senior Advisor Kelley Beaucar Vlahos, will moderate.

 
 

Tomorrow, the World: A discussion with Stephen Wertheim and Andrew Bacevich

Date: November 10, 2020
Time: 1:30 pm Eastern

 
REGISTER
 
For most of its history, the United States avoided making military commitments that would entangle it in European-style power politics. Then, suddenly, it conceived a new role for itself as the world’s armed superpower — and never looked back.

In his new book, Tomorrow, the World, Stephen Wertheim reveals that American leaders made a conscious decision for global dominance. In just eighteen months, before the attack on Pearl Harbor brought the United States into the Second World War, US officials and intellectuals decided not only to enter the war but also to enforce “world order” in perpetuity.

That decision lives on today, but it has outlived its reason for being. In the 21st century, attempting to dominate the world by force has left the United States with endless war and little prospect for peace.

Bacevich has just finished writing a book on the US national security state after the pandemic. He and Wertheim will discuss how to change America’s role in the world today in light of its past.

 

FEATURED

The overreach of the China hawks: Aggression is the wrong response to Beijing 
By Director of East Asia Michael Swaine, Research Fellow Rachel Esplin Odell & co-authors
Foreign Affairs, 10/23/20


In “An Answer to Aggression,” (September/October 2020), Aaron Friedberg argues that the United States and its allies and partners should use aggressive policies to contain China. Friedberg repeatedly offers sweeping, unqualified worst-case statements about China’s views, intentions, and actions—playing loose with the facts and exhibiting a lack of understanding of aspects of the Chinese system—to justify zero-sum policy prescriptions. Coercive “push back” policies alone will not compel Beijing to do the United States’ bidding—as Washington’s Cuba policy demonstrates. To the contrary, such policies would increase the risk of conflict, strengthen chauvinistic nationalism in China, and reduce the chances that the United States can work with China to deal with urgent common problems.


READ HERE

Biden would probably continue course toward conflict with China
By Rachel Esplin Odell, Research Fellow
RealClear World, 10/23/20


After initially accusing President Trump of being insufficiently tough on China for its handling of the pandemic, the Biden-Harris campaign recently changed tack, signaling it would pursue more constructive relations with China in the spheres of public health and trade relations. The party platform adopted at the Democratic National Convention also explicitly disavowed a “new Cold War” with China. 
 

READ HERE

Debate: If this is the future of foreign policy, we’re all in trouble
By Kelley Beaucar Vlahos, Contributing Editor
Responsible Statecraft, 10/23/20

Oh, the naiveté of the Quincy Institute, with their “Top 10 foreign policy questions.” Sure they predicted that their queries “probably” wouldn’t get asked back during the first presidential debate, but still, there was some hope that the event last night — which was billed with at least one national security segment — would throw us at least one bone.


READ HERE

Why we can’t be friends with our allies
By Non-Resident Fellows Patrick Porter & Josh Shifrinson
Politico, 10/22/20

The 2020 contest between Donald Trump and Joe Biden has thrown into stark relief two distinct understandings of the United States’ relationship with its allies. Trump is famously said to view allies in transactional terms as partners of convenience that may need to be coerced or even cast aside. Biden and his team, in contrast, have been at pains to present the United States’ allies in personal terms—as what Biden calls the nation’s “friends.”


READ HERE

What ever happened to democracy promotion?
By Paul Pillar, Non-Resident Fellow
Responsible Statecraft, 10/22/20

Democracy in the world is not doing well, and hasn’t been for the last several years. The watchdog organization Freedom House has recorded a 14-year decline in the political rights associated with democracy as well as other liberties that define a free, pluralistic society. Similarly, the Economist Intelligence Unit registered last year the worst score in its “Democracy Index” since it began compiling the figure in 2006.

READ HERE

America has no duty to rule the world
By Daniel Bessner, Non-Resident Fellow
The New Republic, 10/21/20

The United States is the world’s overwhelming military power, and it’s not even close. The country controls about 750 overseas bases (China, by comparison, has only one foreign base, in Djibouti). It spends around $730 billion on its military, which is more than China, India, Russia, Saudi Arabia, France, Germany, the United Kingdom, Japan, South Korea, and Brazil combined. It has over 190,000 soldiers deployed in approximately 140 foreign countries—around 70 percent of the world’s total. To many Americans and foreigners alike, this power appears as a natural fact of international relations. Very few people alive today can remember a time when the United States did not have the ability to destroy much of the globe.

READ HERE

Learning from Trump in the Middle East
By Annelle Sheline, Research Fellow
RealClear World, 10/21/20

If Joe Biden becomes the next US president, many anticipate that his administration will offer a “return to normalcy,” for better or for worse. Despite the ways in which the Trump administration’s foreign policy has overpromised and underdelivered, there are certain aspects where Biden’s foreign policy team could learn from Trump’s approach, especially in the Middle East. 

READ HERE

McMaster ‘cheapens the sacrifice’ of troops by comparing Taliban talks to Nazi appeasement
By Kelley Beaucar Vlahos, Contributing Editor
Responsible Statecraft, 10/21/20

When retired Lt. Gen. H.R. McMaster was appointed National Security Advisor by newly-inaugurated President Donald Trump in 2017, hopeful observers called him one of the “adults in the room.”


READ HERE

Why it’s a bad idea to ‘debate’ FDD CEO Mark Dubowitz
By Benjamin Armbruster, Managing Editor
Responsible Statecraft, 10/20/20

An obscure but important controversy erupted recently within the foreign policy community in the nation’s capital about whether a former Obama administration official should have participated in a “debate” with the leader of a DC think tank that has been engaged in lying and online harassment of critics while pushing for war and regime change in Tehran for more than a decade. 


READ HERE

How the US became the world’s police
By Sarah Souli/ Interviewed: Deputy Director for Policy and Research Stephen Wertheim
Teen Vogue, 10/19/20

The United States’ cultural identity is so interwoven with military and cultural dominance that we don’t necessarily stop to think of how, why, and when that happened. We spent much of the 20th and 21st centuries entangled in wars abroad, and we maintain military bases around the world. Mainstream thinking tends to assume that this has always been the case.


READ HERE

Reframing America’s role in the world: The specter of isolationism
By Andrew Bacevich, President
TomDispatch, 10/19/20

The so-called Age of Trump is also an age of instantly forgotten bestselling books, especially ones purporting to provide the inside scoop on what goes on within Donald Trump’s haphazard and continuously shifting orbit. With metronomic regularity, such gossipy volumes appear, make a splash, and almost as quickly vanish, leaving a mark no more lasting than a trout breaking the surface in a pond.


READ HERE

Anti-Semitism envoy appears to accuse Jason Rezaian of being an apologist for Iran
By Matthew Petti, Middle East Intern
Responsible Statecraft, 10/19/20

A State Department official accused two prominent Iranian-American figures of serving the Iranian regime, including one Iranian-American journalist who had been taken hostage by the Iranian government for nearly two years.


READ HERE

Not to be left out of the China action, Marines roll out subversive new strategy
By Mark Perry, Senior Analyst
Responsible Statecraft, 10/19/20

US Marine officers are notoriously dismissive of those who talk about strategy. “Strategy?” a Marine who served in Vietnam says. “Here was our strategy: hey-diddle-diddle, straight-up-the-middle.” The description rings true: the Marine Corps’ most famous fights were straight-ahead affairs that gave the Corps its most celebrated moments: at Belleau Wood (in World War I), at Tarawa, Iwo Jima and Okinawa (in World War II), at Inchon (during Korea), at Hue (in Vietnam) and, most recently during the battles for Fallujah, back in 2004. Now, it seems, all of that is changing. 


READ HERE

Trump’s foreign policy chaos might work out
By Andrew Bacevich, President
Albuquerque Journal, 10/19/20

In the first year of Trump’s presidency, references to norms proliferated. Noted foreign policy analysts trumpeted respect for norms as a hitherto rarely noted signature of US policy. Disregarding norms offered evidence of defective statecraft. Trump was a norm-buster par excellence.


READ HERE

FDD's online harassment against critics of Trump’s State Department
By Khody Akhavi, Multimedia Producer/ Featuring: Eli Clifton, Investigative Journalist at Large
Responsible Statecraft, 10/22/20

 

In May 2019, the State Department terminated the $1.5 million Iran Disinformation Project, purportedly intended to combat misinformation emanating from Iranian officials, in the wake of a scandal generated by the project’s attacks on domestic critics of the Trump administration’s policy. But the role Foundation for the Defense of Democracies served as a messaging hub for the controversial taxpayer-funded project has never been revealed until now. 

WATCH HERE

WEBCAST: US-Pakistan Counterterrorism cooperation beyond Afghanistan
With Shamila Chaudhary, Zoha Waseem, Asfandyar Mir, & Adam Weinstein
Quincy Institute, 10/20/20

WATCH HERE

MORE. MORE. MORE.

 
 
DONATE

© Quincy Institute for Responsible Statecraft
2000 Pennsylvania Ave NW, #7000, Washington D.C., 20006

Want to change how you receive these emails?
You can 
update your preferences or unsubscribe from this list.






This email was sent to [email protected]
why did I get this?    unsubscribe from this list    update subscription preferences
Quincy Institute · 2000 Pennsylvania Ave NW Ste 7000 · Washington, DC 20006-1921 · USA