Judicial Watch Sues for McCabe/Strzok/Page
FBI Text Messages
Under Director Christopher Wray your FBI is still covering up the
unprecedented effort by its top executives to sabotage the campaign and
then the presidency of Donald Trump. As you should expect, we are not
deterred.
We just filed a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) lawsuit for text messages
between McCabe and former FBI officials Lisa Page, Peter Strzok, Jennifer
Leonard, and/or former Obama White House Deputy Assistant to the President
for Homeland Security and Counterterrorism Lisa Monaco ( Judicial
Watch v. U.S. Department of Justice (No. 1:20-cv-02995)).
We submitted this FOIA request on February 16, 2018, to the FBI. We asked
for text messages sent from January 1, 2015, to December 31, 2015, between
FBI Deputy Director Andrew McCabe and Lisa Page, Jennifer Leonard, Peter
Strzok, and/or Lisa Monaco. The FBI denied the request, asserting that text
messages are not subject to FOIA.
We challenged the FBI’s determination, filing an administrative appeal
with the Department of Justice arguing that “text messages involving
government-related business sent between government officials, whom all of
the persons identified in the scope of the request are, do in fact
constitute government records that fall within the purview of FOIA.” In
response, the Justice Department’s Office of Information Policy remanded
our request for “further review,” but the FBI ignored the directive and
continues to withhold any text messages. We sued on October 19 after the
FBI failed to respond to the remanded request.
In July, a federal court rejected
the FBI’s request to dismiss a separate Judicial Watch FOIA lawsuit filed
on behalf of Jeffrey A. Danik, a retired FBI supervisory special agent, for
emails and text messages of former-FBI Deputy Director Andrew McCabe. On
October 15, the FBI turned over several
pages of almost completely redacted McCabe text messages while denying
the texts are subject to FOIA.
Here’s the bottom line: The Wray FBI asserts, contrary to DOJ policy,
that it can delete and keep secret all text messages – including those by
the corrupt cadre responsible for the illicit spying on President Trump.
The court should quickly order the FBI to preserve and produce text
messages as FOIA requires.
Last month, we uncovered
that senior members of Robert Mueller’s Special Counsel’s Office (SCO)
repeatedly and “accidentally” wiped over 20 phones assigned to them.
We previously uncovered
Justice Department records concerning ethics issues related to McCabe’s
involvement with his wife’s political campaign. The documents include an
email showing Mrs. McCabe was recruited for a Virginia state senate race in
February
2015 by then-Virginia Lieutenant Governor Ralph Northam’s office.
The news that former Secretary of State Clinton used a private email server
broke five
days later, on March 2, 2015. Five days after that, former Clinton
Foundation board
member and Democrat party fundraiser, Virginia Governor Terry
McAuliffe, met with the McCabes. She announced her candidacy on March 12.
Soon afterward, Clinton/McAuliffe-aligned political groups donated nearly
$700,000 ( 40%
of the campaign’s total funds) to McCabe’s wife for her campaign.
In July 2015, the FBI opened the investigation known as “ Midyear
Exam” into “the storage and transmission of classified information
on Clinton’s unclassified private servers.”
We also discovered Justice Department records
showing that McCabe secretly had recused himself from the investigation
into Clinton’s non-government email server on November
1, 2016, one week prior to the presidential election.
While working as Assistant Director in Charge of the Washington Field
Office, McCabe controlled resources supporting the Midyear Exam
investigation into Clinton’s email scandal. An October 2016 internal FBI
memorandum labeled “Overview of Deputy Director McCabe’s Recusal
Related To Dr. McCabe’s Campaign for Political Office,” details talking
points about McCabe’s various potential conflicts of interest, including
the FBI’s investigation of Clinton’s illicit server.
Remember: McCabe was fired from the FBI in March 2018 for leaking to the
media and lacking “ candor.”
That’s putting it mildly. And Director Wray is still protecting him.
Fauci Emails Show His Approval of China’s Initial Response to
Coronavirus
In breaking news, we just received 300
pages of Fauci emails, including his approval of a press release
supportive of China’s response to the 2019 novel coronavirus. He is
Director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases. The
emails were released by the U.S. Department of Health and Human
Services.
On January 27, 2020, the World Health Organization/World Bank convened the
Global
Preparedness Monitoring Board (GPMB). The following day, the GPMB
Secretariat wrote an
email with the subject line “TIME SENSITIVE Message from GPMB
Co-Chairs: review of draft GPMB Statement on 2019-novel
coronavirus:”
There was consensus for the GPMB to issue a statement supportive of
countries’ (especially China) and WHO response efforts, and to call for
urgent actions to further strengthen global preparedness and response to
this outbreak.
Please find attached a draft GPMB Statement.
On January 29, Fauci responds:
Looks fine. Please see my comments in attached document.
Thanks,
Tony
- Communications between Dr. Fauci and Deputy Director Lane and World
Health Organization officials concerning the novel coronavirus.
- Communications of Dr. Fauci and Deputy Director Lane concerning WHO,
WHO official Bruce Aylward, WHO Director General Tedros Anhanom, and
China.
The time period for the request is January
1, 2020 to April 1, 2020.
Many of the emails consist of missives to large groups of recipients,
including Fauci, from Global Preparedness Monitoring Board, which describes
itself as “an independent monitoring and accountability body to ensure
preparedness for global health crises” convened by the World Health
Organization and the World Bank.
- On January 28, 2020, in an effort to organize a joint statement among
international organizations on “sharing research data and findings
relevant to the novel coronavirus (nCoV),” GPMB’s Jeremy Farrar emails upwards
of three dozen, mostly redacted recipients, including the director of the
National Institutes of Health (NIH), Francis Collins, and cc’ing Fauci,
sending them all a proposed joint statement, which is completely redacted
in the documents provided by HHS, for their review and approval. Shortly
thereafter, Collins responds: “NIH is happy to endorse the joint
statement.” That same day, Professor Stewart Cole, President of the
Institut Pasteur emails Farrar: “Thanks for the initiative. Pasteur is on
board and fully supportive.” A subsequent
statement, which was published two days later on January 30,
says:
The Global Preparedness Monitoring Board
(GPMB) convened on 27 January 2020 to discuss the current outbreak of
2019-nCoV, which was first detected in Wuhan, China, and is now quickly
spreading internationally. The Board commends the speed of the response so
far by countries and the World Health Organization (WHO), the transparency
of China in sharing information and the genome sequence of the virus, and
the strong collaboration between China and affected countries and with
WHO.
- On February 1, 2020, the chief
scientist at the WHO emailed Fauci to let him know the WHO was organizing a global research
partners forum on February 11 and to ask him to attend, also suggesting he
might think about funding and/or undertaking research on this “new viral
outbreak:”
As the head of an agency that would play an
important role in addressing this new viral outbreak, either by undertaking
or funding research, or both, I take great pleasure in inviting you to this
meeting.
- On February 4, Hilary Marston from NIH
replied to the
WHO’s invitation to a coronavirus forum, begging off on behalf of Fauci:
“First, as to your kind invitation to have him join the meeting,
unfortunately his time is entirely consumed as central member of the US
government response team and he will be unable to travel.” She went on to
recommend several individuals Fauci wanted to attend the meeting in his
stead.
- On February 13, 2020, it appears that National Institute of Allergy
and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) Deputy Director for Clinical Research and
Special Projects Dr. Cliff Lane was en route to Japan to
“assist with rapid implementation of a study of the drug remdesivir as a
therapeutic intervention for COVID-19, within the context of the current
cases in that country.” It appears that WHO Director-General Dr. Tedros
invited him instead to come to China to participate in the WHO Mission
there. Fauci’s Associate Director for International Research Affairs,
Gray Handley, replied to
a redacted recipient at WHO that Lane was unable to accept the WHO’s
invitation to come to China: “Due to the importance of this study, Dr.
Lane may not be available to participate in the WHO mission to be
undertaken in China next week.”
It appears that when Fauci discovered what Handley had done, he countermanded
his decision by having HHS Director of the Office of Global Affairs Garrett
Grigbsy send an email informing two individuals, apparently at WHO, that
Lane would be coming to China:
I just talked to Dr. Fauci and there must have been some communication mix
up about Cliff.
Cliff Lane is absolutely going to
China as part of the WHO team (if invited).[Emphasis in
original]
In one fundraising campaign, Ilona Kickbusch of GPMB sent an
email to Victor Dzau on March 3, 2020 and cc’ed Anthony Fauci along
with more than two dozen other, mostly redacted recipients under the
Subject Line: “Re: GPMG: COVID-19 FUNDING NOTE,” Kickbusch says:
Ahead of the GPMB Board call on Wednesday, I’m pleased to attach a note
(on behalf of Jeremy Farrar, Victor Dzau and a small working group) setting
out the urgent need for new funding for the global COVID-19
response.
You will have seen the strong announcement today from the World Bank of up
to $12 bn to support country response, which we warmly welcome. We are
asking for your feedback on the call and consideration for the GPMB to
launch an “ask” this week regarding needs not likely to be covered by
the World Bank announcement – this would target the leaders and policy
makers of other financing institutions and G7/G20 nations…The aim of the
note is to encourage an immediate and full response to the needs of the
world, recognizing that many countries are not well prepared and could be
left behind.
- On March 4, the GPMB group held a
conference call with its board in preparation for making another $8 billion
request to a group of international financial institutions. On March 5,
Alex Harris, head of global policy and advocacy at Wellcome – a global charitable foundation, funded by a £26.8 billion
investment portfolio that does grant funding, advocacy campaigns and
partnerships to raise money for select clients (founded by the
pharmaceutical entrepreneur, Sir Henry Wellcome) – emailed GPMB board members, including Dr. Fauci and included a lengthy
list of “G7 leaders and Sherpas” and “International financial
institutions:”
Thank you for your input on the call
yesterday regarding the COVID-19 funding request that the GPMB will be
making to multilateral financing institutions and G7/G20 nations.
In this regard I attach:
An updated background note revising the ask to $8bn as a result of removing
the [redacted] we had previously included for strengthening country
preparedness, given the World Bank announcement
“The government is now ever so slowly complying with the law and
letting the American people know how they did business with the WHO and
China at the outset of this pandemic,” said Daily Caller News Foundation
President Neil Patel. “We are grateful to Judicial Watch for helping us
force the government to do its job.”
Let me add that these Fauci emails show how praising China was the odd
priority of the WHO in the face of a novel and dangerous coronavirus. That
the NIH tried to slow-roll the release of these emails and is still sitting
on thousands more is a scandal.
Here’s where we stand: On September 22, U.S. District Court Judge Dabney
L. Friedrich ordered
HHS to begin processing 300 pages of emails per month beginning on October
21. In a September 21 court filing, HHS said the agency could begin
producing 300 pages of responsive records to the Daily Caller News
Foundation beginning on November 30, eight months after receiving the Daily
Caller’s request under FOIA. The total number of responsive records is
approximately 4,200, which would have pushed off the full release of the
records until at least 2022. HHS also alleged that Fauci must personally
review each one of his emails before they are released.
Judicial Watch Seeks Bodycam Footage in Fatal Police
Shooting
In the early morning hours of March 12, 2020, 21-year-old Duncan Socrates
Lemp, a student and software developer, was shot and killed by police in
his Potomac, Maryland, home during the execution of a “no-knock” search
warrant.
Pretty much everything about the raid is in dispute, so we have asked the
Montgomery County, Maryland, Circuit Court to order the release of all body
camera footage from the shooting.
We made the request in a motion
for summary judgment in our Public Information Act (PIA) lawsuit
against the Montgomery County, MD, Police Department (MCPD) ( Judicial
Watch v. Montgomery County Police Department (No. V482964)). The
MCPD has moved to dismiss the lawsuit, a request we have opposed. A hearing
on both motions has been scheduled for 10:00 a.m. on December 2, 2020, in
Rockville, MD.
We filed the lawsuit
after the Montgomery County Police Department failed to respond to a June
18 PIA request seeking:
All body-worn camera videos relating to the raid on, and resulting death
of, Duncan Socrates Lemp by a Montgomery County Police SWAT team on March
12, 2020 at Mr. Lemp’s home in Potomac, Maryland.
We argue in its motion/opposition that MCPD is unlawfully withholding the
body camera footage because, in part, they are ignoring the public interest
in the disclosure of the footage:
Release of objective and factual video recordings of Mr. Lemp’s shooting
is critical to addressing and resolving conflicting reports about the
killing. It also would, in Defendant’s own words, “eliminate
speculation and address unsubstantiated allegations of misconduct which
frequently occur.”
We also argue that MCPD’s release of other footage of police-involved
shootings supports the release of footage of the Lemp shooting.
Lemp’s family reportedly said
that Lemp and his family were asleep “when police besieged the residence
from the front of the house” and the family was “awakened by shots
fired through Duncan’s bedroom window followed by the sound of flash
bangs.” According to the family’s attorney, an eyewitness
said Lemp was asleep in his bedroom when police opened fire from outside
the house.
Police disputed that account. The MCPD said in a statement
that SWAT team officers were acting on an anonymous tip that Lemp was in
possession of firearms that he was prohibited from having “due to his
criminal history as a juvenile.”
The MCPD maintains that, upon making contact with Lemp, officers identified
themselves as the police and gave Lemp multiple orders to show his hands
and comply with the officer’s commands to get on the ground. It also
reportedly maintains that Lemp refused to comply with the officer’s
commands and proceeded towards an interior bedroom door where other
officers were located.
According to the Lemp family attorneys, SWAT officers shot Lemp multiple
times. They also reported that an eyewitness “told investigators that
police never made verbal commands upon either her or Duncan until after
Duncan was shot and lay bleeding on the floor. Multiple eyewitnesses told
investigators that the police only forced entry into the home after Duncan
was shot. According to those eyewitnesses, the police had no contract with
any family members until after Duncan was shot.”
The MCPD statement said Lemp was out of bed and standing “directly in
front of the interior bedroom door” holding a rifle “he slept with”
each night as officers “made entry into the bedroom.”
It is surprising, given recent controversies, that Montgomery County would
withhold body camera footage from a police-involved shooting. The unusual
secrecy around the Lemp shooting, which doesn’t fit the Left’s
narrative on police shootings, suggests that politics is at play.
VA Targeted 78-Year-Old Veteran Trying to Hold it
Accountable
Judicial Watch issued the following statement in response to the
disappointing Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals decision
granting qualified immunity to VA police officers who twice arrested Robert
L. Rosebrock, a 78-year-old Vietnam era veteran, who for more than a decade
has been a tireless advocate for homeless veterans and a powerful voice
against the misuse of a 388-acre parcel of West Los Angeles real estate set
aside to serve veterans:
It is a miscarriage of justice that the Ninth Circuit would allow the VA
police officers who arrested Rosebrock to escape accountability for their
actions. The court does not appear to have even considered the compelling
arguments Judicial Watch made on Rosebrock’s behalf or the trial
court’s reasoning in rejecting the officers’ qualified immunity
claims.
The VA clearly holds a grudge against Rosebrock. Although a setback, the
Ninth Circuit ruling is just one small skirmish in Rosebrock’s years-long
struggle against veteran homelessness and demands for VA
accountability. President Trump should demand answers about who at the
VA and DOJ are responsible for perpetuating this grudge against a true
American patriot, as well as answers about the VA’s failed policies on
veteran homelessness and continued misuse of land at the West LA
VA.
Qualified immunity may be appropriate in
some circumstances. It clearly wasn’t in Rosebrock’s case. The Ninth
Circuit clearly got it wrong.
Rosebrock was initially cited for allegedly taking unauthorized photographs
of American Flags on Memorial Day 2016, at the entrance to a public park on
West LA VA campus. The following Sundays, June 12 and 19, 2016, VA police
officers at the West LA VA cited and arrested Rosebrock and seized his
cameras for allegedly taking unauthorized photographs of the officers at
the same park entrance. During the June 12 arrest, Rosebrock was
handcuffed, mistreated, and forced into the back of a police vehicle.
Rosebrock was subsequently acquitted of any wrongdoing in a criminal case
in which he was represented by Judicial Watch. In a cynical appeal of that
ruling, the
court found that the law under which Rosebrock had been charged –
which expressly authorized photography for “news purposes” at
“entrances” – did not prohibit anything.
In June 2017, Judicial Watch filed suit
on Rosebrock’s behalf in federal court in Los Angeles, alleging that the
officers violated his Fourth Amendment rights ( Robert
L. Rosebrock v. Michael Perez, et al. (Case No. 2:17-cv-04354)
(C.D. Cal.)). The officers appealed when the trial court rejected their
claims of “qualified immunity,” a controversial, court-made doctrine
that often allows police officers to avoid accountability for their
actions.
In their appeal, the officers argued that, even if the law under which they
arrested Rosebrock did not prohibit the photography in question, they still
had reason to arrest Rosebrock because, among other disingenuous claims,
“protest” signs lying face down, under a jacket, constituted an
“unauthorized demonstration” on VA property and that Rosebrock was
“loitering” on VA property because he was at the entrance to the VA
park on a Sunday afternoon, without an “official purpose,” when VA
offices were closed.
Stay tuned for further developments….
Seventy Percent of Jailed Illegal Aliens Convicted of Other
Crimes
We have regularly reported on the illegal alien criminals granted free
reign in this country, putting innocents in harm’s way. Here’s more
numbers on the costly illegal alien-related threat to the public safety
from our Corruption Chronicles blog.
The U.S. government spent at least $162 million last year to incarcerate
tens of thousands of criminal illegal immigrants for committing crimes that
include rape, murder, kidnapping and terrorism. The offenders were
imprisoned by the Federal Bureau of Prisons (BOP) and the U.S. Marshals
Service (USMS), which confirm that 94% of aliens jailed in 2019 were
unlawfully present in the U.S. The alarming data was recently disclosed in
a new report
issued by the Department of Justice (DOJ) and Department of Homeland
Security (DHS), which disclose that nearly 70% of known or suspected aliens
in BOP custody last year had been convicted of a non-immigration related
offense and 39% of known or suspected aliens in USMS custody committed a
non-immigration related crime.
Under the Obama administration this type of pertinent information relating
to illegal immigration was essentially ignored, but President Donald Trump
issued an Executive
Order in 2017 that, among other things, forces USMS and BOP to provide
Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) with data on a quarterly basis
regarding inmates and detainees identified as foreign-born during their
criminal case process. In turn, ICE checks USMS and BOP data against its
ICE Enforcement and Removal Operations (ERO) case management system, the
ENFORCE Alien Removal Module (EARM), and the U.S. Citizenship and
Immigration Services (USCIS) Central Index System to identify aliens with
immigration records and pending or completed removal proceedings. The
president’s order also directs the DHS Secretary and Attorney General to
collect data on the following: The immigration status of all aliens
incarcerated under the supervision of the BOP; the immigration status of
all aliens incarcerated as federal pretrial detainees under the supervision
of the USMS and the immigration status of all convicted aliens incarcerated
in state prisons and local detention centers throughout the United States.
The essential data is meant to ensure the public safety of the American
people in communities across the country and to ensure the nation’s
immigration laws are faithfully executed, according to the president’s
order.
The new report states that 51,074 known or suspected aliens were in DOJ
custody in 2019, with the majority (27,494) in BOP facilities throughout
the country and 23,580 in USMS custody at various institutions. The BOP
operates 122 prisons nationwide while the USMS houses detainees in federal,
state, local and private jails. More than half of the 51,074 were confirmed
by ICE to have orders of removal. More than 28,500 of the aliens in BOP
custody committed fraud and 1,147 weapons offenses, according to stats
provided by the DOJ and DHS. Over 1,000 illegal immigrants jailed by the
BOP carried out racketeering and continuing criminal enterprise offenses
such as murder for hire and 535 committed sex crimes that include
production or distribution of child pornography. Around 1,028 aliens
executed serious felonies such as kidnapping, murder, terrorism, rape and
extortion, the report states. More than half of the USMS arrestees
committed drug offenses with the rest incarcerated for immigration crimes,
fraud, weapons violations, sex offenses and racketeering. Nearly 1,000 of
the illegal aliens jailed by USMS carried out serious felonies such as
murder, rape, terrorism, and kidnapping.
The DHS/DOJ report ends with specific cases of sentenced illegal aliens in
BOP custody around the country. The first is a Colombian national sentenced
to 180 months in prison in south Florida for smuggling illegal immigrants
from his country into the U.S., resulting in a rape and two deaths. In
South Carolina, a Mexican national was sentenced to 262 months in federal
prison for conspiracy to distribute five kilograms or more of cocaine. In
Iowa, an illegal alien from Guatemala was sentenced to six months in jail
after being convicted of three counts of unlawful use of an identification
document and four counts of misuse of a Social Security number to obtain
welfare benefits. In Louisiana, a Mexican national was sentenced to more
than two decades in prison for distributing the psychedelic drug lysergic
acid diethylamide (LSD) and possessing firearms. In Mississippi, a Mexican
citizen was sentenced to 330 months in federal prison for conspiracy to
possess with intent to distribute methamphetamine. The list goes on and on,
including convictions for drug trafficking, aggravated robbery, assault,
theft, and illegal voting in 10 elections.
Until next week …
|