We are an increasingly ideologically divided society. When the scientific enterprise becomes political, when the sector’s most respected public organs promote partisan dogma as part of their perceived mission, trust in science itself becomes a casualty.

Of course, proper public health precautions should be taken — social distancing, hygiene, masks where appropriate, and all of that. But it should be primarily up to me to protect myself. The social and mental well-being of those in their prime shouldn’t be sacrificed to on the altar of those whose lives are mostly in the rear-view mirror.

Science, medical, and bioethics journals have been assimilated into the progressive ideological infrastructure. Keep that in mind when they publish “studies” and policy positions — all touted by the  mainstream media — that push ideology as if it were objective science.

The Canadian government is set to expand the killable categories of people who can qualify for euthanasia by deleting any reference to being terminally ill. Once euthanasia is legalized, being dead becomes the imperative rather than preserving life and preventing suicide of the sick.