Several November State Ballot Measures Could Impact Health and Education
This November, in addition to electing officials to state and federal offices, citizens in several states will have the opportunity to vote on ballot initiatives that could have an impact on health and education in their states.
In California, voters will decide whether to repeal the state’s 24-year ban on affirmative action. Proposition 16 would overturn a 1996 ballot initiative that banned the practice. It would permit government decision-making policies to consider race, sex, color, ethnicity or national origin in order to address diversity by repealing a state constitutional provision prohibiting such policies.
Voters in Colorado will decide if the state should increase its tax for all tobacco products, except those labeled
as modified-risk tobacco products (MRTP). MRTP are deemed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration to create lower health risks when compared to other tobacco products. Critics of the carve out for MRTP products believe it was included to benefit the company Altria that lobbied heavily to include language exempting MRTP products. If passed, the increased revenue would initially be used to maintain the K-12 funding lost because of the COVID-19 pandemic, but in 2023, the revenue would be used to pay for universal pre-school.
Oregon is also considering an increased tobacco tax. The ballot measure has been projected to provide the state with an additional $130 million in annual revenue, which would be used for public health programs, including tobacco cessation and prevention.
Finally, voters in Oklahoma will be asked if the state should use funds from its Tobacco Settlement Endowment Fund to pay for the state’s share of another recently
passed ballot initiative, Medicaid Expansion. Supporters of the ballot question say it will allow the state to provide funding for expansion population’s without raising taxes. Opponents argue that taking money away from the program, which is used to pay for smoking cessation and prevention programs, could harm citizens in the state and could also negatively impact the program’s ability to adapt to new products created by tobacco companies.