[link removed] Share ([link removed])
[link removed] https%3A%2F%2Fmailchi.mp%2Fcis%2Fnew-from-the-center-for-immigration-studies-101920 Tweet ([link removed] https%3A%2F%2Fmailchi.mp%2Fcis%2Fnew-from-the-center-for-immigration-studies-101920)
[link removed] Forward ([link removed])
Public Comment and Panel
Biometrics in Immigration: Promoting National Security and Community Safety ([link removed])
By Dan Cadman, October 12, 2020
Excerpt: This comment is in response to the publication in the Federal Register of a Proposed Regulation by the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) and its subordinate agency, U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) at 85 FR 56338 on September 11, 2020.
[link removed]
The Center for Immigration Studies hosted a conversation on the value of biometrics in immigration enforcement and how that relates to national security and public safety.
Featured Posts
Biden v. Trump: The Wall Two very different points of view – one constant, the other evolving ([link removed])
By Andrew R. Arthur
President Trump has been and remains interested in erecting barriers along approximately 1,000 miles of the Southwest border, where law-enforcement believes they are necessary. Former Vice President Biden also support additional barrier construction in the past, but now opposes it and has vowed to stop it if elected.
New DHS Threat Assessment: Expect a Mass Illegal Migration Crisis Next Year: National security 'threat actors' from outside the Western Hemisphere likely to surge, too ([link removed])
By Todd Bensman
The collaborative intelligence community assessment, written by career analysts, sees an increasing likelihood that a new mass migration wave will come out of the Caribbean and Central and South America, especially Cuba and Haiti, next year. Main push-pull factors: Lifting of pandemic-related border restrictions among Latin American countries and economic distress from the pandemic coupled with a resurgence in the American economy.
Trump vs. Biden on Immigration Enforcement Generally: One wants to expand it, the other wants to severely restrict it ([link removed])
By Andrew R. Arthur
With the election looming, it is time to compare and contrast the immigration-enforcement polices of President Trump and former Vice President Biden. Suffice it to say that the current occupant of the White House and the former resident of Number One Observatory Circle have very different agendas. The ability of each to effectuate those visions will have a significant impact on the United States for decades to come.
Chain Migration Advocate Gives Trump a Million, But Gets No Policy Change ([link removed])
By David North
All too many of those promoting mass immigration are rich, savvy, and successful in their policy moves.
Sunday's New York Times lead article about how President Trump has used his hotels to secure funds from political favor seekers unwittingly tells another story, of a chain migration advocate about whom the last two adjectives do not apply.
More Blog Posts
* Donald Trump vs. Joe Biden on Border Control: Two very different agendas, likely with two different outcomes ([link removed])
* Trump vs. Biden: Worksite Enforcement-Two different visions, likely with two different outcomes for American workers and immigration itself ([link removed])
* About Those Border Apprehension Spikes: They're Not Real, but Do Reveal a Real Problem ([link removed])
* Will the New H-1B Rules Create More Jobs for Chinese as well as Americans? ([link removed])
* Labor Department's New H-1B Regs Far More Useful than Those of DHS ([link removed])
Donate ([link removed])
============================================================
** Facebook ([link removed])
** [link removed] ([link removed])
** Google Plus ([link removed])
** LinkedIn ([link removed])
** RSS ([link removed])
Copyright © 2020 Center for Immigration Studies, All rights reserved.
Want to change how you receive these emails?
You can ** update your preferences ([link removed])
or ** unsubscribe from this list ([link removed])
.
** View this e-mail in your browser. ([link removed])