From Ben at Full Fact <[email protected]>
Subject Crime in London has risen less than the rest of England since Sadiq Khan was elected as mayor, not more
Date October 9, 2020 6:15 AM
  Links have been removed from this email. Learn more in the FAQ.
  Links have been removed from this email. Learn more in the FAQ.
The number of recorded crimes per person increased by 18% in London and by 31% across England.

9 Oct 2020 | Facts and news from Full Fact
View in your browser ([link removed])


** FACT CHECK
------------------------------------------------------------


** Crime in London has risen less than the rest of England since Sadiq Khan was elected as mayor, not more
------------------------------------------------------------

Last week, journalist Dan Wootton claimed in a column in the Sun that “Since Boris Johnson stepped down as London mayor, crime in Sadiq Khan’s London has soared at five times the rate of the rest of the country.”

This is incorrect. Between the year ending June 2016 (i.e. roughly the whole year before Mr Khan was elected in May 2016), and the year to March 2020 (the latest data) the total number of recorded crimes per person increased by 18% in London and by 31% across England in general.

So not five times faster, as Mr Wootton claims, but slower.

But the change in recorded crime depends on the offence. For example, over the past year, homicides increased by 23% in London compared to 8% across England, while violence against the person in general increased by 2% in London compared to 7% across England.

Since publishing this article, the Sun has now corrected the error.
Why reporting crime stats is tricky ([link removed])
Reader, we need your help to call out inaccurate reporting ([link removed])

Reporting crime statistics is fraught with difficulties - and it has consequences.

Errors, or sweeping statements made about crime figures can easily be used misleadingly to support particular political agendas, or provoke alarm.

You deserve better. That’s why we need your immediate support.

When good information has never been more needed, you can help call out inaccurate reporting on issues that affect us all.

Just a few pounds a month ensures the most harmful inaccuracies published in the press can be called out and corrected.

If you agree that good reporting matters in a global pandemic, could you become a Full Fact supporter today?
Yes, you can count on me ([link removed])
The Full Fact podcast: series two ([link removed])
We’ve recorded a new series of interviews with world-leading experts and we’re excited for you to hear it.

Every Monday for the next ten weeks we’ll explore different themes of misinformation, from social media bots meddling with elections, to the psychology of conspiracy theories.

Our first episode on the potential dangers of ‘deep fake’ videos is out now.
Listen to episode one ([link removed])


** FACT CHECK
------------------------------------------------------------


** Challenging someone for not wearing a face mask isn’t a breach of the Equality Act ([link removed])
------------------------------------------------------------

Several Facebook users are sharing an image of text which claims that you could be in breach of the Equality Act and fined thousands of pounds if you challenge someone who is not wearing a face covering.

This is incorrect, and a pretty serious misunderstanding of the Equality Act.

Government guidance says, in summary, that you can respectfully ask someone to wear a mask, but they do not have to prove their right to exemption.

One barrister told Full Fact that a request by the owner of a business (like a shop or restaurant) to a disabled person to wear a mask is very unlikely to result in a successful civil claim for disability discrimination, as long as the business owner has followed the government guidance, and hasn’t singled out the disabled person for less favourable treatment than other non-disabled customers.
Who is exempt? ([link removed])


** FACT CHECK
------------------------------------------------------------


** Ordinary colds and flu are not the reason for the “second wave” ([link removed])
------------------------------------------------------------

A Facebook post written on 1 September, with 21,000 shares, suggested that a seasonal spike in colds and the flu is the real reason for a “second wave” of Covid-19.

Although the author appears to be based in Florida, it has been widely shared in the UK.

We can say with certainty that there has been a rise in the number of Covid-19 infections in the UK since 1 September.

We’ve seen more positive tests per day, both among people who came forward to be tested and people tested at random. The number of hospital admissions after a positive test rose in September too.
It’s not just normal cold season ([link removed])


** FACT CHECK
------------------------------------------------------------


** Also this week...
------------------------------------------------------------
* What do lockdown restrictions mean for people in relationships around the UK? ([link removed])
* What did Rishi Sunak actually say about people in the arts? ([link removed])
* How the government performed on its autumn testing targets ([link removed])
* Boris Johnson makes an error about quarantine payments ([link removed])
* A Covid-19 diagnostic test won’t pick up other coronaviruses ([link removed])

Read our latest fact checks ([link removed])


** Stop the spread of bad information ([link removed])
------------------------------------------------------------

Find these updates useful? We'd be incredibly grateful if you could share our fact checks and help more people access good information.
[link removed] Share ([link removed])
[link removed]: https%3A%2F%2Ffullfact.org%2Fonline%2Fsadiq-khan-flu-jab%2F Tweet ([link removed]: https%3A%2F%2Ffullfact.org%2Fonline%2Fsadiq-khan-flu-jab%2F)
[link removed] Forward ([link removed])
[link removed] Share ([link removed])

============================================================
Many thanks from the Full Fact team
** Follow us ([link removed])
** Follow us ([link removed])
** Donate ([link removed])
** Donate ([link removed])
** Like us ([link removed])
** Like us ([link removed])
** Follow us ([link removed])
** Follow us ([link removed])
Please note that we do not respond to replies to this email. If you have any questions or feedback please ** visit our contact form. ([link removed])


You can ** find out how we’re funded here ([link removed])
.
Copyright © Full Fact 2020 - All rights reserved

A registered charity (no. 1158683) and a non-profit company (no. 6975984) limited by guarantee and registered in England and Wales.

Our mailing address is:
2 Carlton Gardens, London, SW1Y 5AA

We use Mailchimp to send you our emails and to see which articles are most popular. ** Read our privacy policy ([link removed])
or ** Mailchimp's privacy policy ([link removed])

** unsubscribe from this list ([link removed])
** update subscription preferences ([link removed])
Screenshot of the email generated on import

Message Analysis

  • Sender: Full Fact
  • Political Party: n/a
  • Country: United Kingdom
  • State/Locality: n/a
  • Office: n/a
  • Email Providers:
    • MailChimp