Prayers for President Trump
and the First Lady
Like me and my family, I’m sure you’re praying for the speedy and full
recovery of President Trump and First Lady Melania Trump from the
coronavirus. As I write, the President is being transported to Walter Reed
National Military Medical Center where he reportedly will be able to work
as he receives world-class treatment. Please also pray for the entire Trump
family and affected White House staff. And, of course, pray for our
country, which faces yet another trial as our President faces this health
challenge.
PA Counties Admit They Gave Incorrect Voter Roll Information to the
Feds
Very often the real story lies behind the curtain. While the country
watched the presidential debate, we were busy fighting for clean voter
rolls in Pennsylvania and other states. Clean voter rolls are a foundation
of honest elections.
We’ve now learned that the State of Pennsylvania and three Pennsylvania
counties admitted they reported incorrect information to a federal agency
concerning the removal of ineligible voters from their voter rolls. In
April, we filed a lawsuit against Pennsylvania and three of its counties
for failing to make reasonable efforts to remove ineligible voters from
their rolls, as required by the federal National Voter Registration Act of
1993 (NVRA) (Judicial
Watch v. Pennsylvania, et al (No. 1:02-at-06000)).
Federal regulations require Pennsylvania to certify to the federal Election
Assistance Commission (EAC) the number of voter registrations removed from
the rolls under the NVRA because the voter has moved out of state.
According to data
the State certified to the EAC in the most recent two-year reporting
period:
- Bucks County, with about 457,000 registrations, removed a total of
eight names under the relevant NVRA procedures;
- Chester County, with about 357,000 registrations, removed five names
under those procedures; and
- Delaware County, with about 403,000 registrations, removed four names
under those procedures.
In recent court filings, Pennsylvania admitted it had certified incorrect
data to the EAC. The State alleged unverified, revised figures for Bucks,
Chester, and Delaware counties. Those three counties also alleged their own
unverified, revised figures, which differed, however, from those provided
by the State. The new numbers alleged by the State and its counties are
still a small fraction of the voter names likely inactive, according to our
analysis provided to the court. We contend that, “even if these numbers
are accurate, which we do not concede, they would still be removing too few
old registrations.”
In its revised filings, the State also conceded that eighteen other
Pennsylvania counties—which together contain about one quarter of
Pennsylvania’s registered voters—had removed a combined total of
fifteen names under the relevant NVRA procedures in the most
recent two-year reporting period.
In its continuing efforts to force states and counties across the nation to
comply with the National Voter Registration Act (NVRA),
Judicial Watch filed its opposition
to Pennsylvania’s move to dismiss our lawsuit, which contends that Bucks,
Chester, and Delaware counties failed to conduct a reasonable program to
remove ineligible registrants from their federal voter rolls as required
under the NVRA.
The lawsuit pointed to the abnormally low number of removals under NVRA
procedures designed to identify voters who have changed residence. The
lawsuit also pointed out that the Commonwealth had over 800,000
“inactive” registrations on its voter rolls.
We compared registration data in the EAC’s report (which was supplied to
the EAC by the counties) to publicly available data from the Census Bureau
to conclude that Bucks, Chester, and Delaware Counties had total
registration rates, respectively, of 96%, 97%, and 97%. Judicial Watch
noted that these numbers are high, both within Pennsylvania and compared to
the rest of the country, suggesting a failure to remove outdated
registrations.
Other Pennsylvania counties have acted to avoid being sued by us. On
January 14, 2020, CBS Pittsburgh reported
that because of the threat of a Judicial Watch lawsuit, Allegheny County
removed 69,000 inactive voters. David Voye, Elections Manager for the
county told CBS, “I would concede that we are behind on culling our
rolls,” and that this had “been put on the backburner.”
Pennsylvania’s voting rolls are such as mess that even Pennsylvania
can’t tell a court the details of how dirty or clean they are. The simple
solution is to follow federal law and take the necessary and simple steps
to clean up their voter rolls.
As you know, we are the national leader in enforcing federal law which
requires states to take reasonable steps to clean their voting
rolls.
In 2018, the Supreme Court upheld
a massive voter roll clean up that resulted from our settlement of a
federal lawsuit with Ohio.
California also settled
a similar lawsuit with us and last year began the process of removing up to
1.5 million “inactive” names from Los Angeles County voting rolls. Kentucky
also began a cleanup of up to 250,00 names last year after it entered into
a consent decree to end another Judicial Watch lawsuit.
More election integrity litigation is coming next week, so stay tuned!
Judge Rejects Stonewall -- Orders Initial Production of Fauci
Emails this Month
The Deep State has been circling the wagons around Dr. Fauci, but that’s
coming to an end – after an unnecessary delay.
A federal judge has ordered
the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) to begin producing
communications and other records of National Institute of Allergies and
Infectious Diseases Director Anthony Fauci and Deputy Director H. Clifford
Lane about the World Health Organization (WHO), China, and the
coronavirus.
U.S. District Court Judge Dabney L. Friedrich on September 22 ordered HHS
to begin producing 300 pages of potentially responsive records per month
beginning on October 21. In a September 21 court filing, HHS said the
agency could begin producing 300 pages of responsive records to the Daily
Caller News Foundation beginning on November 30, eight months after
receiving the Daily Caller’s request under the Freedom of Information Act
(FOIA). The total number of responsive records is approximately 4200, which
would push off the full release of the records until at least 2022.
HHS also alleged that Fauci must personally review each one of his emails
before they are released.
The judge’s order came in response to a FOIA suit we filed in the U.S.
District Court for the District of Columbia on behalf of the Daily Caller
News Foundation (Daily
Caller News Foundation v. U.S. Department of Health and Human
Services (No. 1:20-cv-01149)).
We sued after HHS failed to respond to an April 1, 2020, FOIA request
seeking:
- Communications between Dr. Fauci and Deputy Director Lane and World
Health Organization officials concerning the novel coronavirus.
- Communications of Dr. Fauci and Deputy Director Lane concerning WHO,
WHO official Bruce Aylward, WHO Director General Tedros Anhanom, and
China.
The time period for the request is January 1, 2020 to April 1, 2020.
“People have every right under the law to see the communications between
our government agencies (including Dr. Fauci), China and the WHO at the
outset of this pandemic that has killed so many Americans and destroyed our
economy,” said Daily Caller News Foundation President Neil Patel. “We
are happy that Judge Friedrich agreed with our position that the government
should not be able to keep this information secret. However, the fact that
the document production doesn’t have to start until over six months after
our lawful request — and that the production will not finish until 2022,
is a sad joke. It’s amazing people still wonder why the American people
have lost trust in our national institutions.”
The NIH seems to be playing politics with the Fauci emails. The FOIA
request at issue here concerns records that are likely to shed light on the
China and WHO disinformation campaign on coronavirus – the stonewall
seems calculated to undermine President Trump and protect WHO and China.
President Trump’s Splendid Pick for the High Court
What a brave, wonderful Supreme Court pick by President Trump! President
Trump has once again stood up for the U.S. Constitution with his nomination
of Judge Amy Coney Barrett to the Supreme Court. Judge Barrett has a
demonstrated record of applying the rule of law rather than legislating
from the bench. Her record shows that she will not only respect but apply
the U.S. Constitution as written and intended by our Founding Fathers. And
it would be a wonderful milestone that Judge Barrett would be the first
conservative woman member on the Supreme Court. She seems to be a full
spectrum conservative who is likely to be a force on the Supreme Court for
years to come.
This nomination is another great victory for constitutional government and
a blow to politicized decision-making on the Supreme Court. Most Americans
agree with Judge Barrett that the Supreme Court should apply the law as it
is written and leave the legislating to the people’s elected
representatives.
The U.S. Senate should move quickly to work with President Trump to
consider and approve Judge Barrett before Election Day. There is not much
radical liberals can do to stop this excellent Supreme Court pick. Leftist
threats of violence and court-packing should not slow the Senate one bit.
And all Americans should reject the growing un-American campaign by the
radical left to attack her family and oppose Justice Barrett because of her
religious faith. I had the honor of attending the White House Rose
Garden introduction of Judge Coney Barrett.
Seeing her temperament, family, and learning more about her record in only
further highlighted for me that Judge Barrett cannot be confirmed soon
enough.
You should let your Senators know how you feel about the Barrett nomination
by calling 202-225-3121.
Soros Funds Prosecutor Candidate Who Is Soft On
Criminals
George Soros is a major player in American politics – also intervening in
campaigns for offices that are vitally important to Americans. Our
Corruption Chronicles blog has the latest transparency
report on his political activism:
Leftwing billionaire George Soros just donated $1.5
million to help the nation’s most populous county elect a Black Lives
Matter-endorsed prosecutor who promises to lock up fewer criminals. The
sizable contribution to former San Francisco District Attorney George
Gascon’s campaign for Los Angeles District Attorney is part of a
broader effort by Soros to place leftists in local prosecutors’ offices
around the country. The philanthropist has donated generously to these
types of candidates throughout California as well as in other states,
including Florida, Virginia, Illinois, Texas and New Mexico. Earlier this
year, a Soros-linked group called Missouri
Justice Public Safety PAC gave St. Louis prosecutor Kimberly Gardner,
who criminally charged a couple for defending their home against violent
Black Lives Matter protestors, $78,000.
Soros also helped fund Gardner’s 2016 campaign and his reelection support
has not wavered even though she was investigated for abusing her power to
pursue a bogus criminal case against a political nemesis and fined for
campaign finance violations.
Now Soros, who has long funded international and domestic movements to
advance the left’s radical agenda, is pouring money into the L.A. County
race to remove its first black district attorney, Jackie
Lacey, who is seeking a third term. Judicial Watch has launched an
investigation and this week filed a California Public Records Act (CPRA)
request for Gascon’s records, communications, and expenditures with
various Political Action Committees behind his controversial move from San
Francisco to Los Angeles. According to a conservative news
report, social justice advocacy groups, including Black Lives Matter,
recruited Gascon to come to L.A. and he met with the co-founder and key
strategist of the Black Lives Matter global network, Patrisse Cullors,
about the move south. The same media outlet reported
the recent $1.5 million Soros donation to Gascon this week.
Besides promising to imprison fewer criminals than L.A. County’s current
prosecutor, here is why leftists want him in charge; Gascon helped craft
two state measures, Proposition
47 and Proposition
57, that benefit hardcore criminals under the auspice of “criminal
justice reform.” Proposition 47 decriminalizes drug and theft offenses by
reducing them from felonies to misdemeanors. Proposition 57 grants serious
criminals such as rapists, human traffickers, child molesters and
drive-by-shooters early release from prison. Gascon’s campaign is a
perfect example of outside special interests controlling traditionally
non-partisan races, according to the Association of Deputy District
Attorneys (ADDA), the professional group of deputy prosecutors in L.A.
County. “Special interest groups, funded by George Soros, pumped millions
of dollars into district attorney races across the county,” the group’s
president writes on its website.
“Their mission was to use Soros’s wealth to radically reshape the
criminal justice system.”
Judicial Watch has reported extensively on the multi-million-dollar global
crusade funded by Soros to further advance the left’s radical agenda.
Incredibly, American taxpayers contribute to this outrageous cause. A few
years ago Judicial Watch published an investigative
report on the financial and staffing nexus between Soros’ deeply
politicized Open Society Foundations (OSF) and the U.S. government. OSF
works to destabilize legitimate governments, erase national borders, target
conservative politicians, finance civil unrest, subvert institutions of
higher education and orchestrate refugee crises for political gain. With
the help of American taxpayer dollars, Soros bolsters a radical leftwing
agenda that in the U.S. has included: promoting an open border with Mexico
and fighting immigration enforcement efforts; fomenting racial disharmony
by funding anti-capitalist racialist organizations; financing the Black
Lives Matter movement and other organizations involved in the riots in
Ferguson, Missouri; weakening the integrity of our electoral systems;
promoting taxpayer funded abortion-on-demand; advocating a government-run
health care system; opposing U.S. counterterrorism efforts; promoting
dubious transnational climate change agreements that threaten American
sovereignty and working to advance gun control and erode Second Amendment
protections.
Surge in Illegal Immigrants Smuggled in
Tractor-Trailers
The human flood across our southern border is a crisis, and it is resulting
in traffickers treating human beings like cattle. Our Corruption
Chronicles blog updates
us on the sad scene.
As COVID-19 ravages Latin America—especially Mexico—a record number of
illegal immigrants are being smuggled into the United States through the
southern border in commercial tractor-trailers. Human smugglers cram the
migrants, mostly from Central America, in large trailers with no
ventilation, water or food for days, according to the U.S. Border Patrol.
“The tractor-trailer is the final trap of their 1,600 mile treacherous
journey from Central America to the United States,” the agency writes in
a statement
issued this month. “Migrants are exposed to these dangers by smugglers
who know the life-threatening journey will be in vain given increased
border enforcement and partnerships with affected governments.”
The frontline Homeland Security agency says two Texas border crossings that
are typically hot spots for tractor-trailers loaded with migrants have seen
a 37% increase this fiscal year. The sectors, Rio Grande Valley and Laredo,
have intercepted more than 226 tractor-trailer cases through August with
3,740 illegal immigrants packed in “dangerous and life threating
conditions.” Federal authorities estimate that travel restrictions
designed to stop the spread of COVID-19 have made commercial
tractor-trailers the “conveyance of choice to smuggle large numbers of
people into the United States.” Smugglers usually charge each person
between $6,000 and $12,000 to make the life-threatening journey in a
jam-packed trailer, according to the Border Patrol. “Smugglers are
unscrupulous criminals and will stop at nothing to enrich their pockets,
even if it involves locking human beings in trailers intended for
animals,” said Customs and Border Protection Commissioner Mark A. Morgan.
“They treat illegal aliens as a commodity, inhumanely holding them
captive in overcrowded stash houses with limited access to food and
water.”
Federal agents often find human remains or encounter lost migrants
abandoned by smugglers when they become sick or injured. Smuggling
operations are run by drug cartels and other criminal enterprises, federal
authorities assure. They undoubtedly increase the risk of COVID-19
infection among illegal aliens and those charged with processing them, the
Border Patrol points out. The agency provides a gripping video
testimonial of a young Central American mother who describes the
horrific conditions in tractor-trailer boxes where breathing is difficult
and sexual abuse rampant. Though her identity is protected, Homeland
Security officials say the woman is the voice of thousands of Central
American migrants, including unaccompanied children that have endured a
“myriad of atrocities,” including sexual abuse, assault and kidnapping
by the criminals they pay to bring them to the U.S.
The Border Patrol also provides a grisly photo of a livestock trailer
loaded with illegal immigrants from Mexico, Guatemala, El Salvador, and
Honduras. The large pickup truck pulling the trailer was stopped at the
Laredo crossing with 37 individuals locked inside “with no means of
escape.” The dehumanizing picture shows some of the migrants’ arms
hanging out of the top rails of a vehicle designed to transport animals.
Others are captured trying to peek through the thin cracks. Two other
photos capture a bust of 66 individuals jammed inside the trailer and cabin
of a big rig and another with 35 illegal aliens. In a message to those
considering a tractor-trailer odyssey north, the Department of Homeland
Security (DHS) warns not to trust human smugglers. “Do not endanger your
lives and the lives of your loved ones by embarking on the dangerous
journey to the United States in vain.” Based on the evidence gathered by
his agency, Border Patrol Chief Rodney Scott assures that smugglers “have
no regard for human life.”
The newly released stats are particularly alarming considering that Latin
America leads
the world in COVID-19 cases, according to an international news
conglomerate that reports a surge of infections in Brazil, Mexico, Peru,
Colombia and Argentina. The United Nations calls Latin America a hotspot
of the COVID-19 pandemic, “exacerbated by weak social protection,
fragmented health systems and profound inequalities.” Other reports
describe Latin America as a COVID-19 nightmare
and the world’s hardest hit region. The U.S. government considers
COVID-19 risk in Mexico to be high and has issued a warning
to American travelers of “increased risk for severe illness.”
Securing the border will save lives – not least of those of the illegal
migrants trafficked in the most dangerous circumstances imaginable.
Until next week,
|