From Ron Paul <[email protected]>
Subject Question "the science"? Go to Gulag!
Date October 4, 2020 7:03 PM
  Links have been removed from this email. Learn more in the FAQ.
  Links have been removed from this email. Learn more in the FAQ.
Dear Fellow Patriot,

In the Soviet Union it was forbidden to
dispute the wisdom of the "party line." That's because Marxian
communism was viewed as the scientifically inevitable progression
of mankind. For Marx and Lenin, the "science was settled."
Therefore anyone speaking out against "the science" of the Soviet
system must be acting with malice; must actually want
destruction; must want people to die.

Anyone voicing opposition to the "settled
science" of Marxism-Leninism soon found their voice silenced.
Oftentimes permanently.

Ironically, just 30 years after the "science"
of Marxism-Leninism imploded for all the world to see, we are
witnessing a resurgence here in the US of the idea that to
question "the science" is not to seek truth or refine
understanding of what appears to be conflicting evidence. No, it
is to actually wish harm on one's fellow Americans.

And while we who question "the science" are
not being physically carried off to the gulags for disputing the
wisdom of our "betters" in the CDC or the World Health
Organization, for example, we are finding that the outcome is the
same. We are being silenced and accused of malicious intent. The
Soviet Communists called dissidents like us "wreckers."

Last week on my daily news broadcast, the Ron
Paul Liberty Report, we reported on two whistleblowers from
inside the CDC and Big Pharma who raised serious and legitimate
questions about the prevailing coronavirus narrative. The former
Chief Science Officer for the pharmaceutical giant Pfizer, Dr.
Mike Yeadon, has stated that from his experience he believes that
nearly 90 percent of the current tests for Covid produce false
positives. That means that this massive expansion in "cases,"
used to justify continued attacks on our civil liberties, is
simply phony.

As Dr. Yeadon said in a recent interview
about the Orwellian UK coronavirus lockdown, "we are basing a
government policy, an economic policy, a civil liberties policy,
in terms of limiting people to six people in a meeting...all
based on, what may well be, completely fake data on this
coronavirus?"

Is Dr. Yeadon correct in claiming that based
on his scientific observation there is no "second wave"? We don't
know. But we do know that his claims that the massive increase in
"cases" in Europe used to justify new lockdowns are not in any
way being matched with a similar increase in deaths. The EU's own
charts prove this. Deaths remain a flat line near zero while
"cases" skyrocket to match the massive increase in testing.

Yet when we reported on Dr. Yeadon's findings
on the Liberty Report last week we found that for the first time
ever, our program was removed by YouTube.

YouTube, owned by Google, which is firmly
embedded into the deep state, was vague in explaining just where
we violated their "community standards" by simply reporting on
qualified scientists who happen to disagree with the mainstream
coronavirus narrative.

But they did offer this shocking explanation
in an email sent to us at the Ron Paul Liberty Report: "YouTube
does not allow content that explicitly disputes the efficacy of
the World Health Organization."

Incredible!

It's not the science that is settled. What
appears to be "settled is the impulse to silence anyone who asks
"why"?

In liberty,

Ron Paul
[link removed]

This message was intended for: [email protected]
You were added to the system June 27, 2019.
For more information please follow the URL below:
[link removed]

Follow the URL below to update your preferences or opt-out:
[link removed]

To unsubscribe from future mailings, send an email to mailto:unsub-62800248343-echo3-981121CB8FA72BCBBECB6891887C975E@emailsendr.net?Subject=Unsubscribe&body=Please%20remove%20me%20from%20further%20mailings
with "Unsubscribe" as the subject line.



----Powered by Paramount Communication----
[link removed]
Screenshot of the email generated on import

Message Analysis