| | | Call your Senators and tell them: No confirmation before inauguration! At the height of a pandemic, with an election that is already underway--and two huge cases coming before the court that could significantly negatively impact our LGBTQ+ loved ones--is NOT the time to rush through a candidate for the U.S. Supreme Court. Your calls could make the difference. Take action with a script, phone banking opportunities, and more! | | | | | | | | | Canada - Conversion therapy ban bill reintroduced. Federal Minister of Justice David Lametti said the new bill will include five amendments to Canada's Criminal Code to include offenses such as causing a minor to undergo conversion therapy, causing any person to undergo the therapy against their will, and profiting from the practice. Japan - Japan’s first permanent LGBTQ centre opening in Tokyo. Called the Pride House Tokyo Legacy, the centre is a physical extension of the Pride House Tokyo project, a non-profit advocacy organisation set up to promote understanding and provide support for the LGBTQ+ community during the Tokyo Olympic Games. Mexico - Marriage equality fails to pass by one vote in Sonora. On September 30th, Sonora failed to pass marriage equality by one vote, and on the same day, Baja California’s Secretary General stopped enforcing its constitutional ban (that also previously had a one-vote margin), citing the 2015 federal Supreme Court jurisprudence ruling that banning marriage equality is unconstitutional. Poland - The country's ruling nationalists turn further right with new Education chief appointment in new Cabinet lineup. Naming ultra-conservative appointees on September 30th signals anticipated friction with the United Nations and a warning about anti-LGBTQ+ actions. United Kingdom - Non-Binary People Protected By U.K. Equality Act, Says Landmark Ruling Against Jaguar Land Rover. After years of ambiguity, a U.K. employment tribunal ruled that non-binary and genderfluid people are protected under the Equality Act, which protects people from discrimination on the basis of age, disability, gender reassignment, marriage and civil partnership, pregnancy and maternity, race, religion or belief, sex, and sexual orientation. | | | ALA: Some of the most frequently banned books feature LGBTQ stories. A great deal of the most frequently challenged books of the last decade center around LGBTQ characters and themes, an analysis from the American Library Association revealed. In honor of "Banned Books Week" the ALA's Office for Intellectual Freedom published lists of the top 10 most challenged books of 2019 and the top 100 most frequently banned books of the decade. ILGA launches 3rd edition of Trans Legal Mapping report. The global LGBTQ+ organization released this report (available for free in English and Spanish) detailing the impact of laws and policies on trans persons in 143 UN member States across the globe. | | | Dear Policy Matters: I increasingly read that the ACA is important to more people than I realized, especially in light of COVID-19, and that losing it would have devastating implications for people across the country. Is there information about how many people actually need the ACA, how it’s related to COVID-19 and pre-existing conditions, and what could happen if it is rescinded or revoked? Sincerely, Affordable Care Act Fan Dear ACAF: PFLAG National’s partners at the Center for American Progress issued The Chaos of Repealing the Affordable Care Act During the Coronavirus Pandemic, a report which outlines how the ACA’s repeal during the coronavirus pandemic would be catastrophic for individual and public health. It also includes a table showing how many people in each state would be noted as having a pre-existing condition based solely on COVID-19 diagnoses. The key topic areas, filled with statistics to make the case for each, are: -
More than 20 million people would lose their health coverage, and more than 135 million people would lose protections for their preexisting conditions, including millions of COVID-19 survivors -
People with preexisting conditions and disabilities, including COVID-19 survivors, would be vulnerable to discrimination by insurers -
ACA repeal would throw insurance markets into chaos as millions would lose coverage during a pandemic -
Struggling small businesses and the self-employed could be priced out of coverage -
Young people under the age of 26 could lose access to their parents’ insurance during this period of mass unemployment -
Black, Native, and Latinx Americans who have been disproportionately harmed by COVID-19 would lose insurance in startling numbers -
Insurers could again discriminate against women -
For the tens of millions who would become uninsured, sending children to school becomes not only a health risk but a bankruptcy risk -
Drug costs for seniors would soar, and millions more would not be able to afford their prescriptions during a public health crisis -
Many hard-hit states would be further devastated by the elimination of Medicaid expansion Remember that, on November 10th, the Supreme Court--whatever its makeup at that time--will hear a case on the ACA; follow us on social media and keep an eye on future issues of Policy Matters for updates. | | | |