These outcomes in large part reflect the cumulative effect of state policies prior to the current crisis. Lower paying jobs in the population serving and tourism service industries have been the hardest hit from the closures. The two-tier jobs structure that dominated jobs growth following the Great Recession saw many parts of the state relying on these lower pay industries in the expansion, while higher paying jobs especially within the tech industries were concentrated to a high degree in the Bay Area. Weekly receipts from state income tax withholding continue to exceed the 2019 results from the same period, reflecting the situation that much of the state’s higher paying jobs continue in place in large part because of
extensive telecommuting. In fact, withholding surged 40% the week of September 25 as the result of 7 successful IPOs worth $50 billion, another indication the state’s higher wage jobs tier is continuing to operate closer to pre-COVID levels, while the brunt of the current economic impacts are being felt more heavily in the lower wage tier.
The economic view coming from the Bay Area is not the same as is being experienced by the rest of the state. The most recent Household Pulse Survey results for the week of September 23 show wide difference in the jobs that have been maintained through telecommuting. San Francisco-Oakland-Berkeley MSA reports 52.3% of households with at least one adult telecommuting, while Riverside-San Bernardino-Ontario MSA reports only 27.5%. Los Angeles-Long Beach-Anaheim MSA is closer to the statewide average (39.7%) at 40.9%.
While the Los Angeles area has a larger number of households with telecommuting, the region also has a larger percentage of jobs which have been more vulnerable to the closures. The effect of the closures consequently has been far more severe, with Bureau of Labor Statistics just reporting that Los Angeles MSA slipped from the 9th worst to the 6th worst unemployment rate in the nation in August.
Failure to address the state’s housing supply crisis has contributed further to the disparate impacts of the current shutdown. As the challenge of finding suitable housing they can afford has soared, an increasing share of households instead has been forced into crowded conditions. In the most recent 2019 American Community Survey results, the share of California households in overcrowded housing (defined as more than one person per room) stood at 8.2% compared to the rest of the country at only 2.7%. White non-Latino households were at 2.4%, African-American at 5.3%, Asian-Pacific Islander at 8.4%, and Latinos far exceeding all groups at 17.9%. Under these circumstances, crisis response options remain limited to many minority households, including more challenges for shelter-in-place, quiet conditions for telecommuting even when it is otherwise possible,
and for students far greater difficulty in maintaining spaces suitable for the remote learning essential for them to keep educational pace with their peers.
These conditions are not going to change on their own under current state policies, and in fact the continued flow of regulations being issued by the state agencies even under the current unprecedented crisis conditions threatens to raise the barriers to jobs recovery even more. UCLA Anderson Forecast just revised its projections and now expects full jobs recovery to take at least another two years. The higher paying industries that are now weathering the current crisis will likely to continue to do so during this period. The lower wage workers now bearing the brunt of the crisis will be the ones facing the greatest ongoing effects, currently as even their access to unemployment assistance has been put on hold, in the
intervening years as they search for employment, and in subsequent years for those now facing long-term unemployment and its consequent effects on their life-time earning potential.
|