Share Share
Tweet Tweet
Forward Forward
Last weekend, President Trump announced his intention to appoint Judge Amy Coney Barrett to the Supreme Court seat opened by the passing of Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg. As highlighted in our new eLesson, the timing of these events thrusts the high court into the political spotlight 35 days before the 2020 election, and as a number of important cases loom before the court.

In this newsletter, we highlight a few BRI's resources on the Judicial Branch including our new Homework Help video on the landmark case of Mapp v. Ohio, our Supreme Court DBQs, and our new partnership with Ballotpedia's Learning Journeys which explore the cases of Baker v. Carr and Marbury v. Madison.
Can the police use illegally seized evidence in a court of law? The landmark Supreme Court case Mapp v. Ohio – explored in this brand new Homework Help video – addressed this issue, and their decision has had a lasting impact in the United States. Want to go more in-depth on this case? Check out our Primary Close Read video on Mapp v. Ohio with Kirk and Josh.
Ballotpedia's Learning Journeys provide readers with a way to dive deeper into complex topics with bite-size pieces of information, delivered by email. After subscribing to a journey, they email participants to confirm the topic and learn how quickly you would like to go through the content. Learning Journeys are an easy way to learn more about political topics in just a few minutes a day through the comfort of your inbox. Sign up for the Baker v. Carr or Marbury v. Madison Learning Journeys, and start your journey today!
BRI News and Other Opportunities

Should the U.S. Government Take Steps to Decrease Carbon Emissions?
Climate change is one of the most polarizing topics of the past decade, and it will surely be on the minds of voters when they head to the polls this November. This week, we want to hear students weigh in on the topic: Should the U.S. Government Take Steps to Reduce Carbon Emissions?  The students who make the strongest case for their position win a gift card, swag, and a chance at a $1,000 scholarship. Their referring teachers also receive gift cards and swag for themselves and their entire class.

Why Educate: New Podcast Episode
The start of the school year prompts Mary, Gary, and Eryn to reflect on the broader concept of education and how schooling has evolved throughout history. In this new episode of Fabric of History, they explore how educational structures reflected the times during which they were implemented and what modern-day schooling says about our values today. Has the purpose of education changed over time? And what should the future of education look like?
Have you had a chance to check out these new videos on our YouTube Channel?
Subscribe to our channel to be notified of upcoming releases including a "BRIdge from the Past: Art Across U.S. History" a satirical look at the XYZ Affair and a Homework Help video on the landmark Supreme Court case of South Dakota v. Dole.
Educator Spotlight 

Meet Sharolyn Stauffer!
Sharolyn Stauffer loves the outdoors and is fortunate to live in one of the most beautiful parts of the country for someone with this passion. Her town of Afton, Wyoming is the largest in Star Valley which is nestled in the shadow of the Rocky Mountains. She is able to bring her love for the outdoors, travel, and learning about other cultures to her classroom at Star Valley High School where she currently teaches World History and concurrent credit college courses for U.S. History and Political Science...Read More.
Dear John,

As our country continues to mourn the loss of Ruth Bader Ginsburg and think through the days ahead, I want to draw your attention to the essay the winner of our We the Students Essay Contest winner, Derek Jiang, wrote last spring. He wrote about the enduring friendship between the late Justices Ginsburg and Scalia, highlighting how – despite their strong differences of political opinion – each recognized the importance of focusing on their shared values, rather than their judicial differences. In his essay, Derek wrote,

“I often pondered how Scalia and Ginsburg got along so well. After all, the two must have argued incessantly, and up until recently, I always thought the presence of two conflicting viewpoints in a conversation meant the inevitable clashing of two armies...When asked on 60 Minutes how he and Ginsburg got along so well, Justice Antonin Scalia replied, “I attack ideas. I don’t attack people.” That is the cornerstone of proper civil discourse–the exchange of ideas without personal attacks. It is building bridges between people to understand each other, not burning them down. It is neither side actively trying to 'win,' yet both sides coming out as winners. It is exercising our freedom of thought and speech to educate others. It is listening, respecting, and caring for our fellow citizens."

Justice Ginsberg's life is inspirational for so many reasons. In the midst of our reflections on her life, may we also be encouraged to take a page from her playbook and seek friendships like she and Justice Scalia had, those in which we can be adversaries and thoughtful, caring people at the same time. 

Be well, be encouraged, and stay safe!

Laura Vlk
Senior Manager, Teacher Services
Bill of Rights Institute
Twitter
Facebook
Instagram
YouTube
Website
Copyright © 2020 Bill of Rights Institute, All rights reserved.

Our mailing address is:
1310 North Courthouse Road, Suite 620 Arlington, Virginia 22201

Want to change how you receive these emails?
You can update your preferences or unsubscribe from this list.