From The National Center <[email protected]>
Subject Keeping Schools Closed is a Bad IDEA
Date September 25, 2020 2:00 PM
  Links have been removed from this email. Learn more in the FAQ.
  Links have been removed from this email. Learn more in the FAQ.
When teachers refuse to teach, they are often putting their students – and those students’ parents – at risk...

View this email in your browser ([link removed])
[link removed]
Hello John,

[link removed] teachers refuse to teach, they are often putting their students – and those students’ parents – at risk.

The Trump Administration is seeking to reopen America’s public schools as the COVID-19 pandemic appears to be abating ([link removed]) , a vaccine ([link removed]) seems within sight and the transmission rate among the young is thought to be miniscule ([link removed]) .

Yet many teachers and their unions are refusing to resume in-school studies. As Education Secretary Betsy DeVos pushed back by threatening to transfer ([link removed]) federal funds from places where in-person learning options are denied, American Federation of Teachers President Randi Weingarten charged ([link removed]) that the White House’s “goal isn’t safety, it’s politics.”

But National Center President David A. Ridenour ([link removed]) writes that “it’s Weingarten who’s playing politics, without concern for safety.” In a commentary ([link removed]) published by The Federalist, David remarks that “[f]or many families struggling with disabilities, school closures aren’t just inconvenient, they’re cruel.”

David – who has a son with autism as well as bipolar and seizure disorders – knows firsthand how the unions’ unwillingness to teach according to the rules of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act ([link removed]) (IDEA) can deny “free appropriate public education” to 7.1 million ([link removed].) American students.

He shares his personal story in the commentary.

He notes:

When schools closed in March, many disabled students lost access not only to their education but to all the supports that keep them safe. This deprivation is in violation of the law.

That number, by the way, constitutes around 14 percent of all students in government-run schools. And, if race is brought into the debate, 86 percent of those students aided by IDEA are minorities.

Too many students like David’s son who are helped by IDEA-related teaching cannot be accommodated remotely like most other students are right now. They need special assistance in areas including:
* occupational and physical therapy
* life skills training
* behavioral modification
* communication therapy
* medical care

[link removed]

This is a clear and present danger to these children:

Many of these services stopped months ago, and the kids losing them not only ceased making progress, they lost skills. Even worse, the schools placed many kids and families in danger. Public education for the disabled is about a lot more than education: It’s a key part of our nation’s social safety net.

Furthermore, as David explains, it is a clear and present danger to families:

Just imagine a single mom being told in March she’s on her own with a child requiring 24/7 care. Not being able to work is the least of her problems; finding appropriately trained caregivers is nearly impossible, and her life is one of fear and toil without respite. She has no meals out, no time to socialize with friends, no movie nights, and no breaks of any kind.

Unable to leave her child at home, she takes him everywhere, even to pick up a few groceries. It’s also not uncommon for many disabled children when placed in unfamiliar circumstances or exposed to loud noises, to react violently, which could easily be misinterpreted and trigger a call to police.

Rather than trying to find any sort of compromise, teachers and their unions have resorted to exaggerated publicity stunts ([link removed]) , threats ([link removed]) and insults ([link removed]) . And children are still largely at home – underserved, in the case of IDEA students.

David writes:

Weingarten calls the Trump Administration’s push to reopen schools “evil ([link removed]) ” and “cruel,” but what’s evil and cruel is keeping schools shuttered. While it makes sense to continue remote learning for kids whose parents aren’t comfortable sending them back, it also makes sense to open schools for the many disabled children who are entitled to receive an education under the law. Those children should not be forgotten.

To read all of David’s commentary – “For Children With Disabilities Like My Son, School Closures are Cruel” – click here ([link removed]) to be transferred to the website of The Federalist.
[link removed] Share ([link removed])
[link removed] https%3A%2F%2Fnationalcenter.org%2Fncppr%2F2020%2F09%2F22%2Fkeeping-schools-closed-is-a-bad-idea%2F Tweet ([link removed] https%3A%2F%2Fnationalcenter.org%2Fncppr%2F2020%2F09%2F22%2Fkeeping-schools-closed-is-a-bad-idea%2F)
[link removed] Forward ([link removed])
READ ON OUR WEBSITE ([link removed])
[link removed]
The Trump Administration is right to push for schools to reopen. For many families struggling with disabilities, it was cruel to shut down the schools in the first place. It is heartless to keep them closed now. Find out why in ScoopTV episode 6.
WATCH VIDEO ([link removed])
[link removed] Share ([link removed])
[link removed] https%3A%2F%2Fnationalcenter.org%2Fncppr%2F2020%2F08%2F28%2Fshould-schools-reopen-scooptv-episode-6%2F Tweet ([link removed] https%3A%2F%2Fnationalcenter.org%2Fncppr%2F2020%2F08%2F28%2Fshould-schools-reopen-scooptv-episode-6%2F)
[link removed] Forward ([link removed])
READ MORE FROM THE NATIONAL CENTER ([link removed])

The National Center for Public Policy Research is a communications and research foundation supportive of a strong national defense and dedicated to providing free market solutions to today’s public policy problems. We believe that the principles of a free market, individual liberty and personal responsibility provide the greatest hope for meeting the challenges facing America in the 21st century.
Help support The National Center
A gift to The National Center will be used to fund critically-important programs not offered by any other group, including:
* The Free Enterprise Project (FEP), the liberty movement’s only full-service shareholder and activism group that’s effective in pushing corporate America to the right;
* Project 21, the liberty movement’s only public relations agency for black conservatives and libertarians that has already created over 40,000 media opportunities;
* The Environment and Enterprise Institute (EEI), which counters misinformation being spread by the environmental left.

DONATE NOW ([link removed])

============================================================
CONNECT WITH US
** Twitter ([link removed])
** Facebook ([link removed])
** YouTube ([link removed])
** Website ([link removed])
Copyright © 2020 The National Center for Public Policy Research, All rights reserved.
You are receiving this email because you opted in via our website.

Our mailing address is:
The National Center for Public Policy Research
20 F Street NW
Suite 700
Washington, DC 20001
USA
Want to change how you receive these emails?
You can ** update your preferences ([link removed])
or ** unsubscribe from this list ([link removed])
.
Screenshot of the email generated on import

Message Analysis