The forecasted boost to GDP doesn’t take into account the EU’s own trade deal with Japan, which currently governs UK trade with Japan

18 Sep 2020 | Facts and news from Full Fact
View in your browser ([link removed])


** FACT CHECK
------------------------------------------------------------


** Government overstates value of the new ‘£1.5 billion’ UK-Japan trade deal
------------------------------------------------------------

Upon announcing its new free trade agreement with Japan last week, the Department for International Trade (DIT) said: “Government analysis shows that a deal with Japan will deliver a £1.5 billion boost to the UK economy.”

The problem is that this is a predicted £1.5 billion boost without taking into account the trade deal with Japan struck by the European Union, which came into effect in February 2019 and has been the basis for UK-Japan trading ever since.

In fact, back in 2018 the DIT predicted the EU-Japan deal would deliver a boost to the UK economy of £2.6 billion after 15 years—£1.1 billion more than the post-Brexit deal struck last week.

The government acknowledged this in a second press release the following day.

It’s also worth pointing out that the two estimates aren’t necessarily comparable; one expert told us the estimated value of the EU’s deal with Japan was “what an economist would refer to as a ‘back of the envelope calculation’ or a ‘ballpark estimate’.”
Why Brexit forecasts are so tricky ([link removed])
As we approach a critical time, independent fact checking is needed now more than ever. Can you help? ([link removed])

This week, we exposed crucial missing information in the government’s economic forecasts. We also analysed the UK’s coronavirus testing capacity, as part of the Government’s wider handling of the crisis.

As we approach the end of the Brexit transition period and face a rise in coronavirus cases, fact checkers in the UK face the fight of a lifetime.

As independent, impartial fact checkers it’s our job to make sure people have access to the information they need. But we can only do it with your help.

Just a few pounds a month helps us scrutinise what’s said in debate, and catch out harmful mistakes which mislead the public.

If you agree that the British public deserve good information, could you support Full Fact today?
Yes, you can count on me ([link removed])


**
------------------------------------------------------------


** Recurring claim: ([link removed])
------------------------------------------------------------

A claim that the Royal British Legion won't be selling poppies in certain areas to avoid “upsetting minorities” is circulating again.

The charity has confirmed this is incorrect. It was also incorrect when we saw it last year. And the year before that.

We tweeted about it ([link removed]) here ([link removed])


** FACT CHECK
------------------------------------------------------------


** It’s wrong to say just 0.1% of the people who catch Covid-19 in the UK will die ([link removed])
------------------------------------------------------------

Several readers asked us to look into an opinion article on RT.com, a Russian state news site in English, which claimed that no more than about 0.1% of people who catch Covid-19 in the UK will die from it.

This is wrong.

Although it’s notoriously difficult to estimate the actual fatality rate, even rough calculations find it is likely to be far higher than 0.1%.

By looking at English data, it is clear that the death rate in this country must be much higher than 0.1%. The REACT-2 study—a large survey to check who had Covid-19 antibodies in their blood— calculated the maximum number of infections, and even these two figures would not give a death rate as low as 0.1%

Most scientists tend to produce rates between 0.5% and 1%, which would make it between five and ten times more deadly than this article claimed.
A closer look at Covid fatality ([link removed])


** FACT CHECK
------------------------------------------------------------


** Contrary to Instagram, there wasn’t a plane crash at Gatwick Airport this week ([link removed])
------------------------------------------------------------

A post on Instagram has claimed that a plane crash at Gatwick Airport on Wednesday killed three people and injured 127.

But this didn’t happen.

Besides the lack of reports in any mainstream news outlets, we know there haven’t been any reported plane crashes at Gatwick or any other UK airport in recent days or months.

The post claims this information is from “the English Minister of Health”. The Secretary of State for Health and Social Care, Matt Hancock, has said nothing of the sort.

The post uses an image of an Emirates aircraft which has clearly been edited into a picture of homes in the UK. The composite image does not seem to appear anywhere else online.

You can read more about how to spot misleading images online ([link removed]) here ([link removed])
Why you should check before sharing ([link removed])


** FACT CHECK
------------------------------------------------------------


** Also this week...
------------------------------------------------------------
* This viral post understates the risk of Covid-19 infection ([link removed])
* People deciding not to get tested will not make it look as though coronavirus has been wiped out ([link removed])
* How many children are missing or trafficked in the UK? ([link removed])
* Testing: Where are we? ([link removed])

Read our latest fact checks ([link removed])


** Stop the spread of bad information ([link removed])
------------------------------------------------------------

Find these updates useful? We'd be incredibly grateful if you could share our fact checks and help more people access good information.
[link removed] Share ([link removed])
[link removed]: https%3A%2F%2Ffullfact.org%2Feconomy%2Fuk-japan-trade-benefits%2F Tweet ([link removed]: https%3A%2F%2Ffullfact.org%2Feconomy%2Fuk-japan-trade-benefits%2F)
[link removed] Forward ([link removed])
[link removed] Share ([link removed])

============================================================
Many thanks from the Full Fact team
** Follow us ([link removed])
** Follow us ([link removed])
** Donate ([link removed])
** Donate ([link removed])
** Like us ([link removed])
** Like us ([link removed])
** Follow us ([link removed])
** Follow us ([link removed])
Please note that we do not respond to replies to this email. If you have any questions or feedback please ** visit our contact form. ([link removed])


You can ** find out how we’re funded here ([link removed])
.
Copyright © Full Fact 2020 - All rights reserved

A registered charity (no. 1158683) and a non-profit company (no. 6975984) limited by guarantee and registered in England and Wales.

Our mailing address is:
2 Carlton Gardens, London, SW1Y 5AA

We use Mailchimp to send you our emails and to see which articles are most popular. ** Read our privacy policy ([link removed])
or ** Mailchimp's privacy policy ([link removed])

** unsubscribe from this list ([link removed])
** update subscription preferences ([link removed])