Plus: More than 100 briefs have been filed showing support for our Supreme Court cases | Learn more about the Court’s process
First Liberty Insider
Arizonan Files Federal Lawsuit After Gospel Banned from Christmas Festival

Arizonan Files Federal Lawsuit After
Gospel Banned from Christmas Festival

Police threatened to arrest David Hoffman for sharing his faith at an Arizona Christmas festival. 

Last December, David attended the Winterhaven Festival of Lights in Tucson to share his faith. The festival was held on city streets, open to the public, and free of charge. Hoffman handed out Gospel literature and had conversations about his Christian faith with anyone willing to listen.

Citing a policy prohibiting “political, religious, or commercial materials or messaging,” city police threatened to arrest him unless he moved to a “Designated Space for Peaceful Messaging and Literature Distribution” located on the outskirts of the festival. 

At one point, Hoffman asked whether he could respond to someone who approached him and asked, “What would I do if I am lost?” He was told he could only hold that conversation “outside the perimeter.”

Fearing arrest, Hoffman left voluntarily. But now, he wants to resume sharing his faith at the Winterhaven Festival, including the one this December.

We filed a federal lawsuit this week to ensure that David—and all residents—can share their beliefs in public, as the Constitution guarantees.

“A public street festival is just that,” said First Liberty Senior Counsel Nate Kellum, “a public space where citizens can visit, walk around, and converse with each other about different ideas. The government cannot ban only religious messages.”

 

Supreme Court Declines to Hear Firefighters’ Case

On Monday, the U.S. Supreme Court declined to hear our case on behalf of eight firefighters in Washington state who were punished and put on unpaid leave for requesting religious accommodations.

This leaves in place a ruling by the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals that held the fire department did not violate the law when it refused to accommodate the firefighters’ religious beliefs.

“Washington can celebrate that it has taken away the religious liberty rights of our clients,” said First Liberty Senior Counsel Cliff Martin.

Even though this is the end of the road for this case, First Liberty’s work is far from finished.

Among the multiple cases we are fighting involving the rights of American employees—cases that can ensure our clients and millions of Americans don’t have to choose between their faith and their livelihood:

  • Paige Rogers: A college student was fired from her job as a barista. Why? Because she responded honestly when two of her coworkers asked her about her Christian beliefs.
  • Kenny Mauer: After more than 30 years as a professional referee, the NBA dismissed him because he requested a religious accommodation to the COVID-19 vaccine mandate.
  • Lacey Smith and Marli Brown: Alaska Airlines fired two flight attendants for expressing their religious beliefs. We’re preparing to argue the case at trial and prove before a jury that Alaska Airlines violated the law by firing our clients.

“Government officials should take notice that we will always fight for employees of faith to have equal opportunities in the workplace,” Martin added. “First Liberty will fight until every employee has access to religious accommodations.”

 
100+ Briefs Filed in Support of First Liberty’s Supreme Court Cases

100+ Briefs Filed in Support of First Liberty’s Supreme Court Cases

The U.S. Supreme Court is back in session. The justices are also deliberating which cases to take in the months ahead.

They have already agreed to hear two of ours:

  • International Partners for Ethical Care v. Ferguson, a major case for parental rights and religious freedom.
  • Missionaries of Saint John the Baptist v. Frederick, a land use case that could impact the right of every church and religious group in America to build on their property.

Right now, First Liberty also has a record number of requests pending. We’re waiting for a response on seven, with more on the way.

We’ve also received a massive outpouring of support from all over the country. More than 100 other allies and government officials filed friend-of-the-court briefs supporting our clients.

This broad support underscores how vital every one of these legal battles is for religious liberty. These could impact the freedoms of every American—from students’ rights, to parental rights, the right to seek relief in court for constitutional violations, the rights of houses of worship to be treated fairly, and the freedom to choose the best education for our children.

Taking a case to the Supreme Court requires tremendous resources—but we never send our clients a bill, thanks to our faithful supporters.

Your gift today will help fuel First Liberty’s efforts, helping our legal team fight at the highest level—and pursue victories that can protect religious freedom for decades to come.

Give Today
 

Leading the Conversation

  • Supreme Court Prayer Grotto Case Could Impact 'Every Single Zoning Law' in America, Attorney Says – Senior Counsel Ryan Gardner | Fox News
  • Podcast | Virginia Should Not Make Students Choose Between Faith and Financial Aid – Volunteer Attorney Steve Fitschen | The Hill
  • The Death of Religion Is Greatly Exaggerated – Center for Religion, Culture & Democracy Director of Education & Engagement Stephen Presley | Religion & Liberty Online
  • The Patron Saint of Freedom – Center for Religion, Culture & Democracy Fellow James Patterson | Law & Liberty
 
How the Supreme Court Works

How the Supreme Court Works

by Jordan Lorence, Senior Counsel

The new Supreme Court term is already shaping up to be a significant one for First Liberty Institute. The justices have already granted review in two of our cases.

First, International Partners for Ethical Care v. Ferguson, involving a challenge to a Washington state law limiting parents access to information about their children who run away seeking gender “change” treatment.

And Missionaries of Saint John the Baptist v. Frederic, asking whether Kentucky courts misapplied a federal religious liberty law to allow local residents to prohibit a Catholic group from building a shrine on its own property. 

Let’s pull back the thick burgundy curtains of the Supreme Court to see how it operates.

Read More >>

 

Editors’ Picks

  • Catholic Schools, Banned Rifles And ‘Climate Lawfare’: Blockbuster Fights Await Supreme Court – Fox News
  • Amish Families Weigh Their Futures as Vaccine Fight Continues in New York – Epoch Times
  • Faith and Family on the Docket – WORLD Opinions
  • 5 Cases to Watch at the Supreme Court This Term – The National Catholic Register
  • Hegseth Creates Office of Religious Affairs with Direct Line to Chaplains – The Washington Times
  • Bill Proposed to Protect Ministry Students from Losing Federal Funding – WORLD Opinions
Get Legal Help
Give
FacebookInstagramXYouTubeLinkedIn

Sent by First Liberty Institute
2001 W. Plano Parkway, Suite 1600 Plano, TX 75075 972-941-4444

View Online | Donate | Unsubscribe | Privacy Policy

© 2026 First Liberty Institute