Hello,

Welcome to our flagship newsletter, MarketBeat Daily Ratings.

We'll deliver the latest "Buy" and "Sell" ratings from Wall Street's top-rated analysts directly to your inbox each morning.

But first, we need you to do two quick things:

1. Hit reply, and send a simple "Yes." Just one word. This tells Google (and other emails providers) that you actually want to get our newsletter.

2. After that, this link to confirm your subscription. That will tell us that you received our welcome email and that we should start sending your daily report. 

Confirm your subscription here.

After you have completed these two steps, we would like to gift you a free copy of one of our most popular investing reports: 7 Stocks to Buy and Hold Forever. You can download the report with this link.

Thank you again for subscribing. We look forward to being an important part of your investing journey

Matthew Paulson
Founder and CEO, MarketBeat.

P.S. If you didn’t intend to subscribe, no problem—you can unsubscribe with this link.

(ARReply-161)

3 Space Stocks to Watch as SpaceX Reshapes the Launch Market

Reported by Jeffrey Neal Johnson. Article Posted: 9/25/2026.

For years, the commercial space economy operated under a predictable assumption: getting hardware into orbit was becoming cheaper. That calculus changed abruptly when SpaceX (NASDAQ: SPCX) indicated it will stop selling shared Falcon 9 missions beyond 2028. With its Starlink internet constellation now consuming approximately 79% of Falcon 9 capacity, SpaceX is prioritizing internal deployment over third-party logistics.

While the surface-level explanation is standard corporate consolidation, the underlying reality points to a supply shock. Orbital launch capacity is shifting from a widely available commodity to a heavily constrained asset. This structural change creates a clear divide for investors analyzing the sector. Launch providers now hold substantial pricing power, while satellite operators that rely on purchased launch services face escalating capital expenditures. The current launch landscape shows a closing window of opportunity for independent hardware builders and growing financial risk for businesses caught on the wrong side of the payload fairing.

Payload Pain: Tracking the 2028 Falcon Squeeze

A new resource is driving the comeback (Ad)

Nuclear power's share of global electricity fell from 17.5% in 1996 to about 9% by 2024, according to the IEA. Now Big Tech is reversing that trend.

Google has signed nuclear deals across the U.S. and Europe, including a 25-year agreement to buy power from a revived plant in Iowa. Weiss Ratings' Chris Graebe says the driver is a resource he calls Computium, which demands massive power to produce.

Discover how the Computium boom could revive nuclear power investing

SpaceX recently raised its standard rideshare rates to approximately $7,000 per kilogram. This provides immediate evidence that the capacity squeeze is inflating costs well ahead of the 2028 shared-mission cutoff. SpaceX has a market capitalization of about $1.93 trillion and generates approximately $18.67 billion in annual sales. A recent Nasdaq-100 rebalancing doubles the index weighting for SpaceX, forcing index funds to buy billions of dollars in shares and highlighting institutional confidence in the company's pricing power.

When a single provider controls most commercial lift capacity, a policy change ripples across the entire supply chain. The sudden evaporation of third-party rideshare availability forces satellite operators to seek alternative transportation, creating an overflow of demand for a limited number of operational rockets.

In the aerospace sector, demand does not neatly wait for supply to catch up. Satellites in low Earth orbit experience atmospheric drag and radiation degradation, requiring constant replenishment to maintain coverage. For companies that sell data from space, pausing launches is rarely an option. This dynamic forces operators to accept higher launch prices, shifting economic leverage directly into the hands of the few companies capable of reaching orbit.

Ignition Sequence: Launchers Grabbing Market Share

Independent launchers are moving quickly to monetize this bottleneck. Rocket Lab USA (NASDAQ: RKLB) stands out as a primary beneficiary, with a record backlog approaching $2.36 billion.

Rocket Lab currently commands a market capitalization of approximately $42.5 billion, supported by second-quarter revenue of $234.1 million, up 62% year over year.

As SpaceX steps back from the shared market, Rocket Lab is securing early manifests for its upcoming medium-lift Neutron rocket at $50 million to $55 million per launch, without needing to offer significant discounts to attract payload operators.

Execution remains the gating factor. Management is targeting pad delivery for the Neutron rocket around the fourth quarter of 2026, meaning actual commercial launches will likely extend into 2027. Rocket Lab is insulated by predictable government revenue as it scales, anchored by a recent $266 million U.S. Space Force contract extending through 2028.

Firefly Aerospace (NASDAQ: FLY) is similarly scaling its physical infrastructure to capture orphaned payloads. Firefly Aerospace recently inaugurated a new cleanroom in Cedar Park, Texas. The expansion effectively quadruples its manufacturing footprint, enabling the simultaneous assembly of up to 12 lunar landers and orbital vehicles.

The fundamentals show physical readiness, even as Firefly Aerospace trades around $22, well below its August 2025 initial public offering price of $41 to $43. Recent quarterly revenue surged approximately 659% year over year, and Firefly Aerospace posted an earnings-per-share result of negative 42 cents, beating the negative 50-cent consensus.

Backed by institutional investors such as BlackRock, which holds a 3.68% stake, Firefly Aerospace is positioning itself to convert the industry's capacity squeeze into tangible revenue visibility.

Burning Up on Reentry: Operator Margins Under Pressure

The buy-side of the launch market paints a different financial picture. Satellite operators require continuous orbital access to maintain and upgrade their constellations. As rideshare options evaporate and dedicated-launch prices rise, these operators face direct threats to their unit economics.

Planet Labs PBC (NYSE: PL) exemplifies this vulnerability. Planet Labs topped recent quarterly estimates with a 58.2% jump in year-over-year revenue, reporting earnings per share of 2 cents. However, Planet Labs operates with a net margin of approximately -95.13%, recording recent net income of negative $246.86 million. Expanding its constellation to serve commercial and government clients requires frequent, reliable launches. Higher transportation costs translate directly into higher capital expenditures, delaying Planet Labs' path to profitability.

Planet Labs holds a critical defensive moat in the form of liquidity. Recent filings show Planet Labs maintaining approximately $865 million in cash and short-term investments. This provides a substantial operational runway to absorb higher transportation costs without requiring immediate dilutive financing.

Caution remains evident among insiders, as highlighted by executive Robert Schingler's sale of more than 52,000 shares in mid-September 2026, alongside bearish short interest. Investors evaluating satellite operators should weigh this margin compression against their available cash buffers to determine whether they can weather the pricing storm.

The Starship Shadow: Clocking the Supply Shock Window

The core question for this trade is how long independent launchers' pricing power will last. The 2028 shared-mission cutoff creates a defined window of scarcity, but SpaceX is concurrently developing its next-generation Starship vehicle. Once Starship is commercially ready, it could re-flood the market with low-cost lift capacity, effectively erasing the bottleneck.

Until Starship achieves a regular commercial cadence, the supply constraint is real. Legacy launchers have a few years to secure long-term agreements at premium rates, while satellite operators must navigate higher costs and manage their balance sheets carefully.

Investors may want to monitor the execution timelines for vehicles such as Rocket Lab USA's Neutron and Firefly Aerospace's Alpha rocket, as production delays could limit their ability to fully capitalize on the current supply shock. Those evaluating the space sector might consider how each launcher balances immediate constraints with the eventual introduction of heavier-lift alternatives.