Third Circuit court affirms lower court rulings related to Janus v. AFSCME
------------------------------------------------------------
Welcome to Union Station, our weekly newsletter that keeps you abreast of the legislation, national trends, and public debate surrounding public-sector union policy.
** WHAT WE'RE COVERING AND WHY IT MATTERS
THIRD CIRCUIT REJECTS CLASS-ACTION LAWSUITS OVER REPAYING PUBLIC-SECTOR UNION FEES
ON AUG. 28, A THREE-JUDGE PANEL OF THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT AFFIRMED ([link removed]) TWO LOWER COURT RULINGS THAT PUBLIC-SECTOR UNIONS CANNOT BE HELD LIABLE FOR REPAYING FEES COLLECTED FROM NON-MEMBERS BEFORE JANUS V. AFSCME ([link removed]) .
------------------------------------------------------------
Who are the parties to the suit?
The Third Circuit issued a joint ruling on two separate, but related, lawsuits:
Diamond v. Pennsylvania State Education Association
The plaintiffs are Arthur Diamond, Jeffrey Schawartz, Sandra H. Ziegler, Matthew Shively, Matthew Simkins, Douglas R. Kase, and Justin Barry, all current or former public school teachers in Pennsylvania. The defendants are the Pennsylvania State Education Association, the Chestnut Ridge Education Association, the National Education Association, and several individuals in their official state capacities.
Wenzig v. Service Employees International Union Local 668
The plaintiffs are Janine Wenzig and Catherine Kioussis, two Pennsylvania state employees. The defendant is the Services Employees International Union Local 668.
What is at issue?
On June 27, 2018, the Supreme Court of the United States issued its decision in Janus v. American Federation of State, County, and Municipal Employees. In a 5-4 decision, the court ruled that public-sector unions cannot compel non-member employees they represent to pay fees to cover the costs of non-political union activities. To do so, the court determined, would constitute a violation of employees' First Amendment rights.
Janus overturned the court's 1977 decision in Abood v. Detroit Education Association ([link removed]) . In Abood, the court ruled that public-sector unions could require non-members to pay fees to support union activities that benefitted them (e.g., collective bargaining). These fees are generally referred to as either fair-share or agency fees.
After Janus, the plaintiffs in both Diamond and Wenzig petitioned for reimbursement for the agency fees they, and those similar to them, paid before Janus. On July 8, 2019, Judge Kim Gibson of the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania dismissed Diamond, ruling that the union had collected the fees in good faith given then-prevailing law. On Dec. 10, 2019, Judge Malachy E. Mannion of the U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania issued a similar dismissal for Wenzig.
Both the Diamond and Wenzig plaintiffs appealed to the Third Circuit, which consolidated the two suits. Oral argument occurred on April 24.
How did the court rule?
The appellate panel voted 2-1 to affirm the lower court decisions. Judge Marjorie Rendell ([link removed]) , a Bill Clinton (D) appointee, wrote the court's opinion. Rendell cited similar recent decisions by other federal appellate courts.
We are not the first court of appeals to rule on this question, and we join a growing consensus of our sister circuits who, in virtually identical cases, have held that because the unions collected the fair-share fees in good faith reliance on a governing state statute and Supreme Court precedent, they are entitled to a good faith defense that bars Appellants' claims for monetary liability under 42 U.S.C. §1983 ([link removed]) .
42 U.S.C. §1983 "creates a cause of action for plaintiffs who are injured by a person who, acting 'under the color of any statute … of any State,' causes the plaintiff to suffer 'the deprivation of any rights, privileges, or immunities secured by the Constitution." Rendell, pointing to unclear Supreme Court precedent on the question of whether "private parties may assert a good faith defense to §1983 liability," cited a Third Circuit precedent to that effect:
In Jordan v. Fox, Rothschild, O'Brien & Frankel, we held that a 'good faith defense is available' to private parties who act under color of state law and are sued for monetary liability under §1983. We stated our 'basic agreement' that 'private defendants should not be held liable under §1983 absent a showing of malice and evidence that they either knew or should have known of the state's constitutional infirmity.'
Judge D. Michael Fisher ([link removed]) , a George W. Bush (R) appointee, wrote a separate opinion concurring in the court's judgment but dissenting from Rendell's reading of 42 U.S.C. §1983:
[The] Supreme Court has … read immunities and defenses into § 1983, but it has done so principally on the conceit that they were available at common law in 1871, and implicitly incorporated into the statute. While this approach certainly limits the scope of liability, it also constrains judges from straying too far from the statutory text.
Judge Peter Phipps ([link removed]) , a Donald Trump (R) appointee, dissented from the judgment, writing:
The central question presented in these consolidated cases, which seek recovery of agency fees garnished from the wages of non-union members, is whether a good faith affirmative defense exists to a First Amendment compelled speech claim under §1983. I do not see a valid basis for recognizing such a defense. A good faith affirmative defense was not firmly rooted in the common law in 1871 when § 1983 was enacted, and nothing else compels recognition of such a defense today.
About the Third Circuit
The United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit ([link removed]) is a federal court that hears appeals from the district courts in Delaware, New Jersey, and Pennsylvania. The court has 14 authorized judicial posts and no current vacancies. The chief judge is Brooks Smith, a George W. Bush appointee. Of the court's 14 active judges, six were appointed by Democrats and eight by Republicans. Appeals are heard in the James A. Byrne Federal Courthouse in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
What comes next?
Attorneys for the plaintiffs have not said whether they intend to appeal the decision. The case names and numbers are Diamond v. Pennsylvania State Education Association ([link removed]) (19-2812) and Wenzig v. Service Employees International Union Local 668 ([link removed]) (19-3906).
------------------------------------------------------------
[link removed]
------------------------------------------------------------
** WHAT WE ARE READING
------------------------------------------------------------
* Illinois Economic Policy Institute, "The State of the Unions 2020: A Profile of Unionization in Chicago, in Illinois, and in the United States," Sept. 7, 2020 ([link removed])
* Altoona Mirror, "Unions won’t repay fair share dues: Appeals court upholds decision to dismiss class action lawsuits," Sept. 7, 2020 ([link removed])
* Brookings, "Essential workers during COVID-19: At risk and lacking union representation," Sept. 3, 2020 ([link removed])
* USA Facts, "1 in 10 American employees are in a labor union, just over half the rate of 1983," Sept. 1, 2020 ([link removed])
------------------------------------------------------------
** THE BIG PICTURE
------------------------------------------------------------
** _NUMBER OF RELEVANT BILLS BY STATE_
------------------------------------------------------------
We are currently tracking 102 pieces of legislation dealing with public-sector employee union policy. On the map below, a darker shade of green indicates a greater number of relevant bills. Click here ([link removed]) for a complete list of all the bills we're tracking.
[Number of relevant bills by state]
** _NUMBER OF RELEVANT BILLS BY CURRENT LEGISLATIVE STATUS_
------------------------------------------------------------
[Number of relevant bills by current legislative status]
** _NUMBER OF RELEVANT BILLS BY PARTISAN STATUS OF SPONSOR(S)_
------------------------------------------------------------
[Number of relevant bills by partisan status of sponsor(s)]
------------------------------------------------------------
** RECENT LEGISLATIVE ACTIONS
------------------------------------------------------------
No legislative actions have been taken on relevant bills since our last issue.
------------------------------------------------------------
Thank you for reading! Let us know what you think! Reply to this email with any feedback or recommendations.
BALLOTPEDIA DEPENDS ON THE SUPPORT OF OUR READERS.
The Lucy Burns Institute, publisher of Ballotpedia, is a 501(c)(3) nonprofit organization. All donations are tax deductible to the extent of the law. Donations to the Lucy Burns Institute or Ballotpedia do not support any candidates or campaigns.
Click here to support our work ([link removed])
------------------------------------------------------------
============================================================
** Follow on Twitter (#)
** Friend on Facebook (#)
** Forward to Friend ([link removed])
_Copyright © 2020, All rights reserved._
OUR MAILING ADDRESS IS:
Ballotpedia
8383 Greenway Blvd
Suite 600
Middleton, WI 53562
** unsubscribe from all emails [link removed]
** update subscription preferences [link removed]
[link removed]
