From FAIR <[email protected]>
Subject Peter Maybarduk on Covid Treatments, Kia Rahnama on the Right to Protest
Date September 11, 2020 4:22 PM
  Links have been removed from this email. Learn more in the FAQ.
  Links have been removed from this email. Learn more in the FAQ.
[link removed]

FAIR
View article on FAIR's website ([link removed])
Peter Maybarduk on Covid Treatments, Kia Rahnama on the Right to Protest CounterSpin ([link removed])
Play
Stop
pop out
*

X

MP3 Link ([link removed])
Coronavirus

(cc image: Scientific Animations)

This week on CounterSpin: There is the fact that, back in February, Donald Trump was saying one thing to the public about the coronavirus while saying something else entirely in late night calls to a once-hotshot reporter. And there is the fact that the reporter chose not to share that information with the public until his book was ready to sell. Combined, those facts go a ways toward explaining the particular coronavirus nightmare the US faces, with a president who says and does whatever, public health and humanity be damned, and—where there should be a vigorous, principled check on that—a press corps that can't seem to remember whose interest they're meant to represent.

We talk about seeing around the limitations of corporate media's storyline when it comes to vaccines and treatments for Covid-19 with Peter Maybarduk; he's director of the Global Access to Medicines Program at Public Citizen. They have a new report ([link removed]) about the impact (so far) of Gilead's monopoly control of the possible treatment drug Remdesivir.
Play
Stop
pop out
*

X

MP3 Link ([link removed])
March for Justice, Springfield, Oregon (cc photo: David Geitgey Sierralupe)

(cc photo: David Geitgey Sierralupe)

Also on the show: Corporate predations on public health, police killing of Black people and abuse of those protesting those killings, overt GOP efforts to interfere with the vote, environmental protections gutted, millions of people out of work and facing eviction, while billionaires get richer? Everywhere you turn is a reason to protest. And calling your congressmember is crucial, but if it were enough, well, we'd be done. But as more and more people decide they have to speak up, show up, with others, in the streets—that it's not just meaningful but necessary—they are met with tear gas, rubber bullets, truncheons and the specter of being carted off in unmarked vans, or facing felony charges that will upend their lives. It looks like law enforcement being themselves lawless, but in fact, there is a connection—underexplored —between brutish police responses to peaceful protests and a history of Supreme Court rulings around the First Amendment you thought you knew. We'll fill in some missing
history with constitutional law attorney Kia Rahnama, author of a recent article ([link removed]) titled "How the Supreme Court Dropped the Ball on the Right to Protest."
Play
Stop
pop out
*

X

MP3 Link ([link removed])
Read more ([link removed])

© 2020 Fairness & Accuracy in Reporting. All rights reserved.
You are receiving this email because you signed up for email alerts from
Fairness & Accuracy in Reporting

Our mailing address is:
FAIRNESS & ACCURACY IN REPORTING
124 W. 30th Street, Suite 201
New York, NY 10001

FAIR's Website ([link removed])

FAIR counts on your support to do this work — please donate today ([link removed]) .

Follow us on Twitter ([link removed]) | Friend us on Facebook ([link removed])

change your preferences ([link removed])
Email Marketing Powered by Mailchimp
[link removed]
unsubscribe ([link removed]) .
Screenshot of the email generated on import

Message Analysis