From xxxxxx <[email protected]>
Subject This Week in People’s History, Sep 16–22, 2026
Date September 15, 2026 1:40 AM
  Links have been removed from this email. Learn more in the FAQ.
  Links have been removed from this email. Learn more in the FAQ.


[[link removed]]

THIS WEEK IN PEOPLE’S HISTORY, SEP 16–22, 2026  
[[link removed]]


 

xxxxxx

*
[[link removed]]
*
*
[[link removed]]

_ No More Dangerous Than a Smoggy Day, Said the Experts (2001),
‘There Is Power In a Union’! (1986) _

, New York Committee for Occupational Safety and Health

 

_NO MORE DANGEROUS THAN A SMOGGY DAY, SAID THE EXPERTS (2001)_

TWENTY-FIVE YEARS AGO, ON SEPTEMBER 17, 2001, six days after the
deadly attack on the World Trade Center, many questions were going
through the heads of the hundreds of thousands of people who lived
within sight of the smoke plume that continued to rise high into the
air above the rubble where the twin towers once stood.

Many wondered, is the smoke a health hazard? What about the dust that
covers Lower Manhattan, plus wide swaths of Brooklyn and New Jersey,
which is an ultra-fine powder that billows high into the air from the
force of just a foot-fall or a gentle breeze? And if it is a hazard,
what should I do to protect myself and my family?

On Sept. 11, after towers collapsed, the Environmental Protection
Agency had the same question, so federal workers took samples of the
dust-filled air in nearby Brooklyn. An EPA spokesman said the samples
“did not show any elevated level of concern, especially for
asbestos”.

On Sept. 13, EPA put out a press statement which was widely reported
by the media: "Monitoring and sampling conducted on Tuesday [9/11] and
Wednesday have been very reassuring about potential exposure of rescue
crews and the public to environmental contaminants." 

Then on Sept. 16 the EPA told the media that the head of the
Occupational Safety and Health Administration had said this: “Our
tests show that it is safe for New Yorkers to go back to work in New
York’s financial district.” The OSHA statement also received wide
publicity.

The message was very clear. As the New York Times put it, the air
“poses a very small, and steadily diminishing, risk to the
public”. The Sept. 14 Times article continued, “There could be a
slight health threat, [the experts] said, to city residents with
weakened immune systems, heart disease or asthma, and to rescue
workers who did not wear protective gear or who smoke. Smoking greatly
amplifies the effects of some kinds of pollution, scientists said. But
over all, the danger was no greater than that on a smoggy day, some
officials said.”

Despite the widely publicized assurances, some New Yorkers were
skeptical. They would probably have been more skeptical if they had
known about this secret Sept. 12 directive from EPA headquarters,
which was not declassified until 2015: "All statements to the media
should be cleared through the NSC [National Security Agency] before
they are released." No doubt the NSC was worried that a careless
statement might give the terrorists information about the great
Satan’s ability to test the air.

Some New Yorkers who had expert knowledge of environmental health
hazards and who did not report to the National Security Council were
working diligently to independently determine whether the dust was
hazardous. They had no preconceived answer, but they had many reasons
to wonder how dust that was likely to contain materials that had been
used to build the Trade Center – such as asbestos, drywall, cement,
polyvinyl chloride and lead-based paint – could be harmless. 

One of the organizations making an independent investigation of the
situation was the non-governmental, non-profit New York Committee for
Occupational Safety and Health. NYCOSH was, and still is, devoted to
understanding the causes of occupational illnesses and injuries and to
offering safety and health training to workers and others in New York
State. On 9/11, its small staff included two certified industrial
hygienists.

NYCOSH did not investigate the potential health hazard in Lower
Manhattan alone; it consulted at great length with the staff and
leaders at both the Mount Sinai-Irving J. Selikoff Center for
Occupational and Environmental Medicine and the NYU/Bellevue
Occupational & Environmental Medicine Clinic, as well as the New York
City Central Labor Council. 

Based on those consultations and their hands-on investigation, NYCOSH
published the World Trade Center Catastrophe Worker Health Factsheet
[[link removed]] on Sept. 17. It
warned that the recovery and clean-up operations in Lower Manhattan
have “the potential to cause serious illness, injury, or death.”
The factsheet was the first concerted challenge published by experts
to the “reassuring” messages approved by the National Security
Council.

The NYCOSH factsheet described multiple hazards that cleanup and
recovery workers were likely to encounter, urged the workers to be
aware of them and listed specific ways that workers should protect
themselves, such as wearing appropriate respiratory protection and
protective clothing.

NYCOSH printed thousands of copies of the 4-page factsheet. Staff
members stood at the gates that limited public access to Lower
Manhattan and handed the factsheet to any worker who wanted one.
Others carried the factsheets into Lower Manhattan and handed them to
the hundreds of day-laborers who were hired to clean dust-filled Lower
Manhattan office buildings.

The struggle over an accurate characterization of the health risk
created by the attack continued for years. The official position was
always to deny any risk or to minimize it when denial was
impossible. 

The proponents of the official position, with the resources of
government at every level and the major media solidly behind them,
refused to be decisively defeated, but neither could they ever win the
argument, because, with the passage of time, more and more people got
sick (and some died), as a result of their exposure to contamination
that had been alleged to pose only a “slight health threat . . . 
to city residents with weakened immune systems, heart disease or
asthma”. And they continue to get sick and die to this day.

In the words of occupational medicine doctor Jacqueline Moline, who
has been treating people with 9/11-related illnesses since shortly
after the towers collapsed and is now director of the Northwell Health
Queens World Trade Center Health Program, “For over 25 years, we
have cared for people who were exposed to the aftermath of September
11th. Hundreds of thousands of people were at risk then and remain at
risk for disease now. While we initially saw respiratory disease, we
now are faced with increasing numbers of our patients developing
cancer. Over 57,000 cases of cancer have been documented.” 

Nearly ten thousand people have died as a direct result of their
exposure to 9/11-related contamination.

(Full disclosure: The author of this item was the public affairs
director at the New York Committee for Occupational Safety and Health
on 9/11 and contributed to the composition of the NYCOSH factsheet.)

The text of the NYCOSH factsheet can be viewed
at [link removed] 

 

_‘THERE IS POWER IN A UNION’! (1986)_

__

FORTY YEARS AGO, ON SEPTEMBER 22, 1986, Elektra Records released
Billy Bragg’s album Talking with the Taxman About Poetry. 

The album includes There Is Power In a Union, with Bragg’s lyrics
set to music composed in 1862 by George Frederick Root for Root’s
patriotic Civil War song, The Battle Cry of Freedom.

Bragg’s version of There Is Power In a Union, which has the same
title as an unrelated song by Joe Hill, has become an international
anthem for the labor union movement. You can listen to it here:
[link removed]
[[link removed]]

For more People's History,
visithttps://www.facebook.com/jonathan.bennett.7771/

* World Trade Center collapse health hazards
[[link removed]]
* New York Committee for Occupational Safety and Health
[[link removed]]
* 9/11 attacks
[[link removed]]
* Billy Bragg
[[link removed]]

*
[[link removed]]
*
*
[[link removed]]

 

 

 

INTERPRET THE WORLD AND CHANGE IT

 

 

Submit via web
[[link removed]]

Submit via email
Frequently asked questions
[[link removed]]
Manage subscription
[[link removed]]
Visit xxxxxx.org
[[link removed]]

Bluesky [[link removed]]

Facebook [[link removed]]

 




[link removed]

To unsubscribe, click the following link:
[link removed]

Message Analysis